User talk:Whitmore 8621
Unblock Request[edit]
Whitmore 8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I promise if my account is unblocked i willl stop the Metal Gear Solid Peac Walker plot editing and i will never vadilaise it ever again. I am really sorry for the trouble I have caused.--Whitmore 8621 (talk) 05:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Whitmore 8621
Decline reason:
Doesn't fully address reasons for the block: Specifically the abuse of multiple accounts. Feel free to file another unblock request if you will fully address the reasons for the block. (Disruptive editing, and abusing multiple accounts) Taelus (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock Request 2[edit]
Whitmore 8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I apologized for my behavior and I will apologize again, I was just unblocked today after a 7 day suspension. I acknowledged I did wrong with Metal Gear Solid Peace Walker and so fourth. I forgot about the three revert rule but I did realize I could get blocked for it, I will meet any requirements to be unblocked, I promise not to edit war like today ever again. this was my apology note from before', I apologize to both Eeekster and Bilcat for this edit war I had no intention of being anything like a moron art all I just being I bit upset with some of my conflicts over the last few months. I see that I did wrong and I will stop these disruptions and will try very hard to be a great wikipedia editor in everyday. I guarantee never to edit war from now on. I admit I did wrong I was just a but upset with today. Whitmore 8621--Whitmore 8621 (talk) 05:53, 18 August 2010 (UTC),
Decline reason:
The remark below from Taelus sums it up nicely. You just came off a block for disruptive editing, you are lucky this one is only a week again. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:19, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- The problem is, that you have been warned and advised about similar behaviour in the past, and have also stated you would stop such behaviour in the past. What makes this time different? Personally I think more time to sit out might help you drop this now long-term fight with Eaglestorm. You have got to the point now where you are edit warring with him over trivialities, disregarding our policies. Whilst I am not going to review the unblock request above, I would like to throw in the idea of a interaction ban being put in place between the two editors to stop this pointless feud which has now lasted months, wasting editing and administrative time which would be better focused on the project. --Taelus (Talk) 17:47, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
Whitmore 8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I stayed away Eaglestorm alone for a while and then he came back on me, It is not like I have been edit warring with him for the last 250 days exactly it was mainly on Peace Walker which I admit I was a fool especially since I turned out to be wrong with the plot., Why he was blocked for 24 hours, He insults me with profanity and insults me and he gets off that easy I thinking about quitting this encyclopedia. . I have had to put up with him for months just as much as anyone else and Im the bad guy he is no saint either and he only got blocked for 24 hours he should have been blocked for a week aswell. i tried to make amends with him and He refused and decided to attack me again. I would do anything to be unblocked or for the block to be shortened. Many things have happened in the last 8 or 6 months and people forget things, I forgot about the 3 edit rule on Peace Walker, I promise or swear I am telling you the truth.
Decline reason:
There are a million articles on Wikipedia, and even more editors. You choose to focus on the one article where you have a history of problems. You are responsible for your own actions, and your own responses to conflict. You are already aware of 3RR, and blatantly chose to break it, even though you know the proper ways to deal with disputes. You went there; you knew better; you're lucky it's only a week (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:04, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Unblock request 3[edit]
Whitmore 8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I Do Not Care anymore Goodbye. I see I am just that much hated and because I have been on wikipedia for over a year and I am treated like a worthless piece of crap by a bunch of people who are good mates with each other and I am blocked for 7 days Eaglestorm made my life a living hell and humiliated me I am a High school student. I told you I did not know about the three revert rule at all Im sorry but since I will not get unblocked User:Fastily you are a hyperkrit and you Bibwilkins are a terrible human being who likes to bully people and triple team people just like with Eaglesotrm I live in Australia so good luck to you you stupid people Their is one user I have deep respect for but you will never know who that is. I did so much for this encyclopedia and I am treated like pet or a servant. Eseekter you are lier and a moron, Eaglestorm to hell with you I will never forget how you treated me you little cyber bully and Last but not least This is my final message I give the users who blocked me my deepest regrets to see a honorable user quit you will regret this. . Good Bye)
Decline reason:
Extending to indef, firstly because you are effectively requesting it here, and secondly because the personal attacks against the editors involved show that this problem will be on-going should you ever be unblocked. Best of luck in whatever you choose to do in the future. Taelus (Talk) 13:44, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Thanks you just what I wanted I appreciate this. Whitmore 8621--Whitmore 8621 (talk) 02:45, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks you very much this just what I wanted I appreciate this, I never mentioned that you as one of the people reason being is because you are a Excellent contributor to this encyclopedia and helped me out sometimes. Whitmore 8621--Whitmore 8621 (talk) 08:57, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
Whitmore 8621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
If my account is unblocked I will never use multiple accounts or ID's. I won't will never vandalize editing ever again. I will never insult other users. I promise to never cause problems ever again. I understand now and admit I have done wrong. --Whitmore 8621 (talk) 11:41, 10 March 2010 (UTC)Whitmore 8621
Decline reason:
Your sentiments are in the right direction, but I don't see good reason to believe that you've changed this quickly. If you really do want to edit again, try again in a few months, and give a lot of thought as to what led to this situation. Seraphimblade Talk to me 15:52, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access revoked.[edit]
As you are still removing declined unblock requests from this page, or "un-reviewing" them, I have removed your talk page access. In a few months time if you want to make another unblock request, send an e-mail to an administrator, or contact unblock-en-l@lists.wikimedia.org. ---Taelus (Talk) 13:34, 1 September 2010 (UTC)