User talk:Waylif22
Waylif22, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Waylif22! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 26 February 2019 (UTC) |
April 2019[edit]
Hello, I'm Notimelivelong. I noticed that you recently removed content from Pelswick without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Notimelivelong (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Roary the Racing Car[edit]
If Hit didn’t have anything to do with the show, then explain why it’s on these Hit Favorites. DVDS https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61coXjvHNpL.jpg
https://m.media-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMTEzMjA1Mzc4NjZeQTJeQWpwZ15BbWU4MDQ0MTEwODIx._V1_.jpg
https://prodimage.images-bn.com/pimages/0884487109353_p0_v1_s550x406.jpg Trainboy 48 (talk) 16:12, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
Welcome Waylif22!
I'm S0091, one of the other editors here, and I hope you decide to stay and help contribute to this amazing repository of knowledge.
| To help get you started, you may find these useful: | When editing, follow the 3 Core Content Policies:
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the 
button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes ~~~~ at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
DreamWorks Classics[edit]
Will DWC be absorbed into Universal?
A page you started (Coliseum Entertainment) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Coliseum Entertainment.
User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:
The target currently does not mention Coliseum Entertainment at all.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
signed, Rosguill talk 21:56, 19 May 2019 (UTC)
Nicktoons premiere air dates[edit]
Where did you get the premiere dates for the Nicktoons that didn't premiere on the same day as the main Nickelodeon channel?
Anthonyg3281 (talk) 12:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late response, but I think you might be able to find the Nicktoons premiere dates on archived versions of websites with the Nicktoons schedules on them (like Zap2it). Waylif22 (talk) 18:51, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
- I always look at Nickelodeon, Nick Jr., and Nicktoons TV schedules on Internet Archive, but I've only been able to find ones from February 2008-January 2018 (Nickelodeon), February 2008-January 2018 (Nick Jr.), and October 2012-January 2018 (Nicktoons). Zap2It got a new layout in January 2018, and if I go to one of the archived 2018 or 2019 dates in Internet Archive, it only shows the schedule for the present day. I haven't been able to find any schedules from Early 2000s (Nickelodeon), Early 2000s (Nick Jr.), and May 2002-September 2012 (Nicktoons). I also can't find any from April 2014-July 2015 (all) since Zap2It had a new layout for a brief time back then until it went back to the old layout one year later on Internet Archive and the guide would just keep trying to load more channels on the TV guide when I tried to look at the schedules from those dates. I'm still trying to find them to this day, but it's hard because the archived Zap2It pages are set to eastern, and when I try a different zip code, Internet Archive only has 1234 areas. I try to look for them on the different providers it shows, but they either don't have it archived or it redirects to a newer one. Anthonyg3281 (talk) 22:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Nicktoons page[edit]
Shouldn't the Nicktoons page have it's own section for repeats of ended Nickelodeon series? Yes, I get that they only do reruns, but Nick Jr. also does reruns of ended series on their channel as well, so it should be like the Nick Jr. page because it doesn't make sense to put ended series with Nicktoons' current repeats of currently going shows on the main Nick channel.
Anthonyg3281 (talk) 22:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, I know that Nick Jr can also air reruns of ended shows, but most of their current programming consists of ongoing series that still air new episodes, so it will make sense to separate them. Nicktoons, however, works differently as they only air reruns of shows both ended and current, and they always air the new episodes of the ongoing programs after Nickelodeon does it first, so they count as reruns too, and it will be pointless to separate it from the already ended programs since they also only air in reruns. Waylif22 (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Please read Template:Infobox television again. Company parameter instruction says: “The names of the production company or companies that funded/organized series production. Note: sub-contractors hired to perform production work, e.g. animation houses, special effects studios, post-production facilities etc. should not be included here, as this may create confusion about the nation(s) of origin.” In Totally Spies!, TF1 and Disney France, you say they are funding services, And the instructions say that funding productions ARE allowed in the template. Thanks, HappyINC (💬) 23:07, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, so maybe funding services ARE allowed, but TF1 is a TV channel and not a production studio, so Disney France can stay but TF1 shouldn’t even be there anyway... Waylif22 (talk) 23:36, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Please look at the image and the end of the intro. There is Sprout. The show is a Sprout original, right? And it was made in 2014. NBCUniversal owned Sprout since 2013. NBCUniversal distributes the rights to their shows. You should know that. Come on. You don’t seem to know anything about distributions and rights, do you? This is why I think that distributor parameters shouldn’t even exist. Because there is too much confusion and edit warring going on about. Goddamn. HappyINC (💬) 21:38, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I think YOU are the one who doesn’t know about distribution and rights. The end of the credits give copyright information to Scholastic, not Sprout or NBCUniversal. Just because a company helped produce a show doesn’t mean they own it. For example, PAW Patrol was produced in association with Nickelodeon, but is owned by Spin Master Entertainment, and this is proven by the copyright at the very end. You still have a lot to learn. Waylif22 (talk) 22:47, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
I agree with Waylif, plus you were very rude and uncivil during your edit summaries. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
- Oh god, you made me mad, I literally had a good time and I sad and now what you said made me mad. Plus, I already know about rights. So much fucking BACKSTABBERS! Stuff like this gotta ruin my good moods and moments. HappyINC (💬) 1:21, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
You need to CHILL. Welcome to Wikipedia, we are civil to each other and we cooperate together. I don’t care how angry you are, you need to understand that your edit was in good faith, but wrong. Please be more civil and cooperative. HurricaneGeek2002 (talk) 13:39, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks![edit]
Hello,
Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.
I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!
From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.
If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.
Thank you!
--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)
Template[edit]
Hey there, I noticed the template you created: Template:Nickelodeon co-productions, conflates actual co-productions (where at least one of Nickelodeon's studio teams was involved) with acquired shows they just financed from other copyright owners. I think the name should be changed at least, since it confuses genuine co-productions with shows they had minimal to no involvement in. Almost every Nick show has been co-produced with another studio, judging from the "Co-production" parameter on Nickelodeon Animation Studio's page. But (almost all of) the shows listed on the template aren't related to one another, among other things, which goes against Wikipedia's guidelines for navigation templates here. It says "If the collection of articles does not meet these criteria, the articles are likely loosely related. A list, category, or neither, may accordingly be more appropriate." I think the categories already on the articles, ex. 1990s Nickelodeon shows, suffice. That's because these shows are so loosely related and the subject isn't coherent (many editors would be confused and wonder why shows like the ones co-produced with Klasky-Csupo, DreamWorks, etc. aren't on the template). Capcapandgengen (talk) 15:56, 16 December 2019 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Nickelodeon co-productions[edit]
Template:Nickelodeon co-productions has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Capcapandgengen (talk) 17:04, 28 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |