User talk:WalterWalrus3

Welcome!

Hello, WalterWalrus3, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 20:02, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

Mighty Ducks of Anaheim page

I reverted your edits because the "Anaheim Ducks" thing has been mentioned numerous other times in the article already, and the extra mention was unnecessary. Just thought I'd explain myself. Your contributions are valued though, so don't stop now. :) Thanks. --Buchanan-Hermit 21:14, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Foothillsign2.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Foothillsign2.png. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:07, 23 May 2006 (UTC) Luna Santin

Clamper

About your changes to Clamper. If you want to start a new article about Clamper related to E Clampus Vitus, please do not replace the current content. Instead, you need to do a Move, a disamb page, and then start a new article. Your creation of Clamper (Electronics) was also incorrect. -- Gogo Dodo 04:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: I removed your edit on User:Light current because I thought it was a bad warning and also, if it were a good warning, warnings do not belong on User pages, but Talk pages. -- Gogo Dodo 06:43, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Foothill High School (Pleasanton, California)

Regarding your last message to me, please see Talk:Foothill High School (Pleasanton, California). ********** 04:14, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from personal attacks

Hi WalterWalrus3,

Please refrain from making personal attacks in Wikipedia, as one of your edits does. Not only is this an official policy, but it more productive to offer constructive criticism. Comment on the content, not the contributor. Thanks, GChriss <always listening><c> 18:01, 3 September 2006 (UTC)a

Anamas Pooter

Please do not recreate that article. It was already decided that it should be deleted. Academic Challenger 23:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)

Amador Valley High School Talk

Please refrain from using vulgar language on Wikipedia. Your comment was rude, immature, and of no value to the page. It was removed. Xiphos 19:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:NBABallers.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:NBABallers.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

What the hell just happened?

I came within moments of permanently blocking you as a highly abusive vandal, so care to explain? Glen 02:23, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Me too; I just indefinitely blocked you. Now I changed my mind: you're unblocked, for now. Please do NOT do that again. Thanks, Antandrus (talk) 02:24, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

My friends were angry because that user keeps changing info on the Foothill High School page, but i reverted it. this looks highly suspicious but i swear, just look at the plethora of info ive contributed to the site. WalterWalrus3 02:28, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Eeggs

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. You are, however, encouraged to add appropriate content to the encyclopedia. If you feel the material in question should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Danl 18:56, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Myspace and Soundclick have thier own pages, because they are more notable. Plus, my comments are formated correctly.Danl 19:04, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I am not going to get into a flame war over this, so I suggest you create the article again, and see if another person tags it for deletion, since an administrator and I already agree it should have been deleted. Danl 19:11, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

Miss Gabe

Lois Faye "Miss Gabe" Gabriel is an African-American academic support guru from California's Bay Area, she was born in rural Texas. Her techniques in helping students succeed have astonishling success rates. For almost 35 years she has made students at Foothill High School realize their potential with ideas like 25 minuet Wednesdays (which now take place on Thursdays), green sheets, and a zero tolerance policy with computer gaming. Her goal is to help struggling kids get better grades. Gabriel struggled through adversity throughout her entire life, growing up in racist times in the southern United States and then teaching at a California high school that was almost one hundred percent white. Gabe has had many stern critics in her life, but many more students who look up to her as one of the greatest academinc support teachers ever. Faye has voiced that she plans on retiring after the 2006-2007 school year.

Techniques

Gabriel has employed many creative techniques to her practice, including green sheets, p-points, and 25 minuet Wednesdays.

Green Sheets

Gabriel started giving out green progress reports with 6 blank slots on them, one for each class of the day, during the 1993 school year. The goal of these sheets is to give students an idea of where they stand in the academic process. She adds incentive to getting them signed by alotting 25 points to a student's grade for filling them out.

P-Time

P-Time is short for "Productivity time," which is a time where students can do homework, read, or anything else school related. During this time students can achieve p-points, which are 0-5 grade points a day, 0 being an F and 5 being an A, which count for 50% of a students grade.

25 Minuet Wednesdays

25 minuet Wednesdays, which now take place on Thursdays, are an oppertunity for students to learn about test taking tips, organization, or anything else Gabriel has assigned for her students. These time periods are anywhere between 15-25 minuets, though always called 25 minuet Thursdays, give students what Gabe says is an edge to succeed.

Home Life

Ms. Gabe also activley involves herself with the church and loves all children, but has none of her own, she says this is because she loves her students too much and wouldn't want her few kids and hundreds of students to have to compete for attention, causing a conflict of intrest.

Faye Gabriel

You removed a db tag from this article. Please note tha policy: "do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself." You may add information to the article itself or to the talk page, but you may not remove this tag. --Bookgrrl 01:07, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

vote change

i went back and reviewed my edit. the deletion was inadvertent. to those whose votes i deleted, i am sorry. otherwise back off.

Your warnings

No sir, I very much disagree: your warning are other people's business, to the degree that it shows your track record, and one should not have to consult the history to see it. Other editor's have the right to know that you have received warnings for vandalism in the past, as it can and should influence their opinion as to your actions and attitude in the present. If and when I feel it is necessary, I will make the edits I feel are justified, and I will not be warned off by you. ---Charles 04:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

Re: Faye Gabriel

Apology accepted. Everyone- and this absolutely includes myself- can get hot under the collar sometimes. We become better people by learning from our mistakes (and believe me, I"ve made my fair share of them). -- Kicking222`

Warnings

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Peyton Manning. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Dlong 21:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Chase Field logo,jpg.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Chase Field logo,jpg.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Coorsfield.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Coorsfield.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 20:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Montreal Expos

I speedy closed the AFD you started on this article because there really is no reason to delete it. Yes, we do have articles on extinct baseball teams such as the Cleveland Spiders and the St. Louis Browns. If you wish to merge the Expos article with the Washington Nationals article, that's a good idea in my opinion, but AFD is not the right venue for such a proposal. YechielMan 22:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Let me explain myself, I believe that articles like Houston Colt .45s and Vancouver Grizzlies are in the right spot, because they still exist as another team, articles like Minnesota North Stars, are however, in the wrong place, because they are the same team in a different place. Therefore Montreal Expos bleongs in Washington Nationals. Just as St. Louis Browns, Kansas City Athletics, and Washington Bullets are. WalterWalrus3 22:45, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

WalterWalrus3, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sports would be one place to start discussing your idea and building consensus toward a guideline. I don't know that your rule is the one I would use, and I think even in the case of a guideline there should be room for "local" editorial consensus on having one, two or more articles to cover the history of a renamed/moved team. The general rule of thumb should probably be more how much material or editorial interest there is for a separate article.--Dhartung | Talk 00:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Why are you merging the Expos?

Why are you so adamant about merging these articles? Outside the fact that they are technically the same franchise, there is absolutely NO relation between the Expos and the Nationals. Besides, there is more than enough information about the Expos that lumping them into the Nationals page would make the article too large. It's just like Doctor Who. There have been over ten different incarnations of the title character over the years and every single one of them have have their own separate articles because every single doctor have their own separate quirks and personalities. The same thing is true with relocated sports teams. Just because they are technically the same doesn't mean they HAVE to be put together, especially IF the completely shed their former identity in favor of a brand new one. So teams like the Hartford Whalers, Houston Oilers, Syracuse Nationals, and the Montreal Expos deserve their own articles. It makes tons more sense to keep them separate. Dknights411 00:30, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

It's Ok. It's always been my #1 Wiki rule to wait for a consensus before doing anything major like merging. As for the Expos debate, I left a lengthy argument on the Expos talk page as to why I feel that the Expos, or other article like it, should be kept. Dknights411 01:00, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Minnesota North Stars

I can only speak for the NHL team pages. If you have any merger plans (or other plans), bring them up at WPH or WPT, to get peers views. GoodDay 16:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:8 mile dvd cvr.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:8 mile dvd cvr.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:38, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Mag 07162007.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Mag 07162007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:FoothillLogo.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:FoothillLogo.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free image with no fair use rationale uploaded after May 4, 2006 which has been tagged as not having a rationale for more than 7 days.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[Talk:Image:FoothillLogo.jpg|the article's talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zedla (talk) 13:55, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:BallersPhenom.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:BallersPhenom.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seraphim ^Whipp 12:11, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Espnmag.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Espnmag.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:23, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Transformers

By all accounts, your lead might start like this: "Transformers is a high-grossing Academy Award-nominated science fiction Hasbro toy line film adaptation directed by Michael Bay." The Academy Awards nom is correctly written. Alientraveller (talk) 13:02, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:FHSandJones.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:FHSandJones.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Soundvisions1 (talk) 20:00, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Re: Megan Fox

Hi There. Yeah, sorry didn't mean to make it sound like I had an issue with you. I do believe she is still a catholic though, I've heard her say it in various places, and they do mention it on her fan club site (no guarantees, but likeley). Thanks for your input. Pyrofork (talk) 05:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of Persay for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Persay is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Persay until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anus Williams

Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Under section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 03:22, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, WalterWalrus3. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, WalterWalrus3. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Deku Nut listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deku Nut. Since you had some involvement with the Deku Nut redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:34, 28 January 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, WalterWalrus3. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Turfjpg.jpg

The file File:Turfjpg.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

"Earf" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Earf. Since you had some involvement with the Earf redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 23:29, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)