User talk:Vikiemoney

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:55, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, and it is a pleasure to be here, and it is a true pleasure to help! Vikiemoney (talk) 00:05, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

whosdatedwho[edit]

Hi Vikiemoney, welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for your contributions. Just a heads-up: I saw that you had added whosdatedwho.com as a source in a couple of articles. That is not a reliable source, it's a user editable website and so-called "content scraper" with no editorial oversight. I have removed the references to whosdatedwho so you don't need to be concerned about that, but just so you know for the future. Happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 18:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. And again, I'm happy to help. Vikiemoney (talk) 20:47, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Disney Infinity (video game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page UI. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I got rid of the UI link from the Disney Infinity (video game) page. Thanks again! Vikiemoney (talk) 04:29, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Cable, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Resurrected.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Issue resolved, thanks for informing me. Vikiemoney (talk) 12:36, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Alex Blake (Criminal Minds)

added a link pointing to Agent

Band of Outsiders (clothing brand)

added a link pointing to Clothing label

Kemono Friends

added a link pointing to Japanese

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of the links have been removed, the issues are now all resolved. Thanks for informing me! Vikiemoney (talk) 15:33, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

Hello, I'm Zxcvbnm. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Simply being "based on" something is not grounds for prominent inclusion in an article. It should be recognized and noted as such in reliable sources. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 18:07, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know because I appreciate it. This is how I learn and this is how I get better in this area. Thank you. :) Vikiemoney (talk) 18:18, 26 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking[edit]

Hi there. I would recommend that you read WP:OVERLINK, but the general overview of it is we do not link common words every native English speaker would know. So things like online, novel, novelist, comic etc we do not link. Thanks. Canterbury Tail talk 12:22, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thanks for informing me. Vikiemoney (talk) 12:25, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Phone Swap (TV series)[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Phone Swap (TV series) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://deadline.com/2018/05/phone-swap-snapchat-dating-show-premiere-fox-station-summer-limited-series-elisabeth-murdoch-1202382205. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion Review. — Diannaa (talk) 22:29, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't copy this material word for word from Deadline. On top of that, it was already approved by an Admin. If this was an issue, why wasn't this addressed days ago? Why didn't nobody give me a warning or inform me in advance before the deletion? I also wrote it in my own words. That's really weird. I will be looking into this on my end to see what exactly happened and what would cause such a speedy deletion? Vikiemoney (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Content you included was identical to the Deadline article in some spots and only lightly paraphrased in other spots. That's a violation of our copyright policy. The article was not approved by an admin; the page was reviewed by a reviewer and marked as reviewed. The article didn't exist days ago; it was deleted 30 hours after being created. If you wish to get another opinion on the deletion, please visit WP:deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 01:29, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a place where I can go to see the article that I created so I can have it for my records? I can probably re-do this sometime in the future? Because I spent a lot of time working on that, especially doing the research. I don't want to have to re-do all that work all over again. It took a lot of my time. I hope you understand where I'm coming from, and thank you so much for explaining this to me. I'm still learning about this platform. There really is so much to learn. Oh My God! He -- He! When do you know when an article is approved, compared to being reviewed by an admin? Looking forward to hearing from you please. Thanks! Vikiemoney (talk) 04:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also when will it be okay for me to re-create the Phone Swap (TV series) again? Vikiemoney (talk) 11:34, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All the content you included was in the Deadline article so you could use that as your starting point. But it would be better to find multiple sources (at least three) that discuss the series in depth and write your article from scratch in your own words. Our articles don't get officially approved in any way by admins. Reviewers check new articles but sometimes they miss things such as copyright problems. Reviewers might be admins but they don't have to be. — Diannaa (talk) 11:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate it. Vikiemoney (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A good place to go if you have general questions about Wikipedia editing is Wikipedia:Teahouse. Good luck and have fun. — Diannaa (talk) 12:05, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I truly appreciate it. Also, I just finished producing the new version for Phone Swap (TV Series). I really hope it's better than the first version I created previously before deletion. You can look it over if you want. By the way, I only used Deadline once. Thanks! :) Vikiemoney (talk) 13:06, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Continued overlink disruption[edit]

You are still massively overlinking articles on items that don't need linking, such as this edit. Please stop. Canterbury Tail talk 15:03, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I saw this on tons of articles on Wikipedia for words like this one "fictional characters", noted and will do. Thanks! Vikiemoney (talk) 15:19, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My Eyes On You (video game) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, My Eyes On You (video game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. More info: Thanks for the article! However, notability guidelines, see WP:GNG, usually decide what articles are worthy of notice to be included on Wikipedia. But a collection of routine announcements disguised as reviews in the reception section, interviews, non-independent websites, routine announcement columns, and gameplay overviews does not show significant coverage that meets GNG; the game is not yet released and is likely WP:TOOSOON. VickKiang (talk) 00:27, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me! :) Vikiemoney (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Shawn C. Phillips for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shawn C. Phillips is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn C. Phillips (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:05, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Alexandermcnabb thanks for your review and informing me. I left my message on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shawn C. Phillips (3rd nomination) page. Thanks a bunch! Vikiemoney (talk) 14:29, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Echo Worlds[edit]

The article The Echo Worlds has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFILM. No reviews. All citations are just announcements of the film at festivals, film database sites, or interviews with participants. Nothing else found in a BEFORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 13:41, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:Donaldd23, thanks for informing me. Can you please move my page "The Echo Worlds" back into Draft mode (draftspace) so I can re-tackle this in the future when there are more references and better sources available. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks! Vikiemoney (talk) 18:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Donaldd23, for moving "The Echo Worlds" back into Draft mode (draftspace), I appreciate it. Have a lovely day! Vikiemoney (talk) 19:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Running Out Of Time (2018 film) (November 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Need reviews from nationally recognized critics.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Running Out Of Time (2018 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vikiemoney! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! S0091 (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello "S0091", first of all I want to thank you for your review because I really appreciate it! All of your changes have been made and I even added in an accolade from the source "Deadline Hollywood". It has now been moved to the Article Space. Thanks a million! Vikiemoney (talk) 04:36, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Filmhub[edit]

The article Filmhub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCORP. All sources in article appear fail WP:SIGCOV as they are either not independent of the subject, are just discussing how much they've raised or cannot be used as a source in the first place.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 15:17, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Keep" - Hello "Padgriffin", first of all, I want to thank you for looking over the Filmhub article because I really appreciate it, but I don't understand how this article is proposed for deletion when there is an entire page written up about it in detail on the notable "Deadline Hollywood", and this is a very strong source. Plus, it is already talked about / connected to a few notable articles here, such as Klaus Badelt, Miguel Gaudêncio, Forget Me Not (2019 film), Tengers, Struum, etc. Thus, it meets nobility WP:GNG. If you or anyone else feels strongly (100% sure) that this article is not ready for the public, please convert it to draftspace so I can tackle this later in the future. If not, let the voting commence respectfully. Looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks! Vikiemoney Vikiemoney (talk) 17:12, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Deadline source, again, fails SIGCOV due to it obviously not being independent of the source. Again, notability is not inherited. Please read WP:RS and WP:GNG. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 17:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Padgriffin, please move Filmhub to draftspace. Thanks! Vikiemoney (talk) 17:53, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind Padgriffin, I was able to figure out placing it into draftspace all by myself. So, there will be no need for deletion, I will just have to tackle this one again sometime in the future. Thanks anyway! Vikiemoney (talk) 18:00, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Running Out of Time (2018 film) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for creating Running Out of Time (2018 film). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 15:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello "Padgriffin", first of all, I want to thank you for looking over Running Out of Time (2018 film) because I really appreciate it, but I don't understand how this article was forced into draftspace and is labeled with "it might meet the criteria for speedy deletion". First of all, a hand full of the cast members are notable here on wiki, such as Tasha Smith, RonReaco Lee, Telma Hopkins, Paul Logan, etc. On top of that, there have been some strong reviewers/editors here on wiki who have contributed to this article previously as well. I would think sometime last year, someone would have already informed me about this. Plus, this film is talked about in Deadline Hollywood and it is shown on the notable BET, Netflix, and BET Her. Lastly, it is even listed on WorldCat as "Running out of time | WorldCat.org". Thus, it meets nobility WP:GNG. Respectfully looking forward to hearing from you. Thanks! Vikiemoney Vikiemoney (talk) 16:43, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First off, notability requires verifiable evidence and is not inherited. Some of the cast members being notable does not mean that the article automatically inherits that notability. The Deadline article fails WP:SIGCOV with regards to the topic as it is mentioned in passing once in the entire article. All of the other sources are basically just the synopsis of the film, which fail the independent clause of SIGCOV. Only three other editors have edited this article, one rejecting it from AFC for a lack of reliable sources showing notability (which you ignored and moved to mainspace anyways), the other fixing capitalization in the title and the third deleting a large chunk of the article.

Worldcat is not a proof of notability. Neither is it being shown on BET, Netflix or any other form of media. Please read WP:GNG. Thank you. Padgriffin ^{Griffin's Nest} 17:19, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Padgriffin, but there is no need for that type of energy respectfully. As far as the first editor is concerned, I did make him or her changes. They asked for film reviews, and I provided them and, along with other updates, they asked for. I did what they asked me to do. The best way to learn is by asking. All I wanted was a detailed explanation. That was all. Plus, I'm still learning about this political system called wiki. Thanks & Happy New Year! Vikiemoney (talk) 17:47, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:MHTP[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:MHTP, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:My Eyes On You (video game)[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:My Eyes On You (video game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:04, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:My Eyes On You (video game)[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "My Eyes On You".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Encore Global[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Encore Global requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – CityUrbanism 🗩 🖉 10:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello User:CityUrbanism, please take Encore Global out of speedy deletion mode since I brought this into Draft Space. I will come back to this later when it has better references / sources. Thanks, and happy holidays! :) Vikiemoney (talk) 14:28, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Echo Worlds[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Echo Worlds, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:15, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Echo Worlds[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Echo Worlds".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:02, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Filmhub[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Filmhub, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Encore Global[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Encore Global, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:01, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Filmhub[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Filmhub".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:57, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Encore Global[edit]

Hello, Vikiemoney. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Encore Global".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:49, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]