User talk:VashiDonsk
My talk page[edit]
Please make all comments below this line. Thank you! VashiDonsk(T) 02:52, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 15:06, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
U.N. coined term[edit]
Found the one who changed it. If you go back to the "history" of a page, you can see who made the changes. User:Zleitzen changed it. I will have a quick talk with him/her and give the link: http://www.un.org/aboutun/history.htm. Colonel Marksman 17:54, 18 April 2006 (UTC) PS: I haven't been here long, though I've contributed to plenty, so I might not be the best source of answers (such as yourself).
May 2008[edit]
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If they continue to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you! Toddst1 (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry about that. I didn't see that the last warning was two weeks old. VashiDonsk 01:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Just so you know, WP:MOSHEAD, part of the Manual of Style, says that headings should be in sentence case. That is, only the first word and any proper nouns should be capitalized. Thus, the proper heading is "Route description", not "Route Description". Please keep this in mind when writing articles. Thanks. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Also, a little tip when you're writing infoboxes... Using {{jct}} to create the shields and route links is A-OK, but the city parameters should only be used for exit and intersection lists in the article itself. Using the template sets the city off with a dash, which we use to indicate destinations in the exit list. For the infobox, you should link the city separately, and use the word "in" or "near". For example:
{{jct|state=TN|US|431|TN|1}} in [[Murfreesboro, Tennessee|]]
US 431 / SR 1 in Murfreesboro
- Hope that helps. Thanks so much for all your work so far!
-- Kéiryn (talk) 17:55, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
Credible author[edit]
Hello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record.
Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- If I were you, I would not violate WP:3RR whether you are right or wrong. Anyhow, the page is blocked, so I don't know why you are asking me to help. VashiDonsk(T) 19:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice[edit]
Hi,
As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.
We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.
You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.
We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!
Addbot (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
- I am not a UK Wikipedian, so I am very confused. VashiDonsk(T) 23:22, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:UnivSNashville Logo.gif)[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:UnivSNashville Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 08:02, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
Description of the picture Chronic_lymphocytic_leukemia.jpg[edit]
Hi
I looked at this picture and missed a description.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Chronic_lymphocytic_leukemia.jpg
Are those blood cells stained?
Are the white ones the sick?
Thanks for the picture and the adds.
Jangirke (talk) 03:38, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Non-free school logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:13, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Mirko Ranieri question[edit]
Hi, VashiDonsk. Mirko has not been in the news lately since being released by Tottenham Hotspur, because he has not been playing soccer professionally. Thus, it makes sense that you would not be aware of where he is at the moment. The fact of the matter is that he is currently a sophomore at Harvard College, where he plays soccer for his House (our residential house system is based on those of the United Kingdom). Although it may not be professional, the edits that I made on his Wikipedia page are in fact true. His House is Currier House, and he plays on the soccer team for Currier House (hence the reason why I edited his page to say Currier House FC) and not for the Harvard College varsity team (I believe NCAA rules may prohibit him from playing, though I would need to fact check to make sure). Therefore, I edited his Wikipedia page to reflect recent happenings as it is true that he came back to the sport after a long absence. I cannot point you in the direction of an article or other source because it's all very low-key. Mirko, I, or anyone else on the Currier House team could, however, vouch for this information. Thanks, and I hope that clears things up.
Ah, I see. I was under the impression due to the lack of any verifiable sources that your edit was hoax vandalism. Sorry about that. We can certainly note that Mirko is now attending Harvard College in Currier House. That said, I would refrain from editing his page in the future if you are a friend of Mirko as that may violate Wikipedia's policy on conflict of interest. Thanks. VashiDonsk(T) 17:27, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I saw your edits on his Wikipedia page. Perhaps the best solution would be to just return everything back to how they used to be, leaving no trace (i.e. this conversation as well as the changes on his page) in the interest of privacy. I haven't talked to him directly about this, but I would assume that he doesn't want all of his business all over the Internet (this would also deal with any conflict of interest matters as well). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.112.10.193 (talk) 23:34, 2 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Gabe Dixon has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -©2016 Compassionate727(Talk)(Contributions) 23:33, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, VashiDonsk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
[edit]
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, VashiDonsk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, VashiDonsk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Please help with usability testing[edit]
Hello! The mw:Anti-Harassment Tools team is running a usability test to find out how and where IP addresses are used when patrolling wikis, particularly when patrolling RecentChanges. This could include New Pages or RecentChanges patrol. We want to see your patrolling process and get your views on some prototypes. Getting your perspective would be really helpful to us at this stage of the process. If you’d like to help, and have 30 minutes to spare, please fill out this Google form with your details: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfjYyRNGMkO4_TdNOgG4qmK9cp9YOKzM4GFO5pTd_bEcu23YQ/viewform
For the purpose of the tests we’ll be using Google Forms for recruitment, and UserTesting.com to conduct the actual tests. Please review the privacy statement and release form in https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ijmwrIoNO0W1p_zfFU1LBf3_6mFF53kUUFy1L_DCUKc (Google docs link)
Thank you,
NKohli (WMF) (talk) and PSaxena (WMF) (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2020 (UTC)