User talk:VARNAMi

June 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to List of awareness ribbons has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.

For help, take a look at the introduction.

The following is the log entry regarding this message: List of awareness ribbons was changed by Michael14375 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904426 on 2016-06-17T07:53:28+00:00 .

~~Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:53, 17 June 2016 (UTC)~~[reply]

Struck as this edit was not vandalism. False positive reported. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:56, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Michael14375. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

p.s. Please try to maintain text-source integrity. Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:13, 4 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dylann Roof. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mlpearc (open channel) 06:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Camp Shorabak[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Jake Brockman (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

April 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stevie Starr, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 07:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lil Pump, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:17, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lil Pump, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:41, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael14375/Userboxes/smoking[edit]

Hello Michael14375,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Michael14375/Userboxes/smoking for deletion, because it seems to be a test. Did you know that the Wikipedia Sandbox is available for testing out edits?

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 21:09, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved it to User:Michael14375/Userboxes/smoking -- seems obvious you intended this to be in user space, not article space.----Fabrictramp | talk to me 01:31, 19 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

Hello, I'm STATicVapor. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Lil Peep, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. StaticVapor message me! 19:08, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Another belated welcome[edit]

Hi Michael14375. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Ronz (talk) 16:34, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PewDiePie[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on PewDiePie; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Ronz (talk) 16:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnicelebs.com as a source[edit]

Hi Michael14375. I noticed that you recently used ethnicelebs.com as a source for biographical information in Luke Steele (musician) and Katy Steele. Please note that there is general consensus that ethnicelebs.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See User_talk:XLinkBot/RevertList#EthniCelebs.com). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 16:58, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your comment:

Wikipedia is a cooperative editing environment. Sometimes it can be challenging to collaborate with others that have different viewpoints than your own. I'm happy to explain further about my comments to you, or address the direct concerns in your comment if you'd like. --Ronz (talk) 20:53, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And in XXXTentacion ‎. --Ronz (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you.[1][2][3][4][5] --Ronz (talk) 16:53, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding another source to use in XXXTentacion. Please be much more careful with your choice of sources. Referring to WP:RSP might help, though sources like ethnicelebs.com that are given to a Bot for flagging and cleanup are often not listed. --Ronz (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Avicii. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:30, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Original research[edit]

Please note that one of the cornerstones of Wikipedia is that it does not accept original research. At Avicii, you added that his death was caused by "suicide by self-harm". The two sources you provided certainly support that this was a suicide, though neither supports that it was "self-harm". In fact, the article you linked to--self-harm--states in the first line that it is "done without suicidal intentions". If you can find a source to support that Avicii was performing an act of self-harm that accidentally resulted in his death, I would urge you to add that source to the Avicii article. Until then, it is best not to draw your own conclusions. If you feel I am incorrect, please discuss on the Avicii talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:50, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sources claim Avicii committed suicide by cutting himself with a wine bottle. Isn't that what self harm is? Michael14375 (talk) 16:48, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No. You're making the error of assuming that a compound expression means what it would if its composite words were taken literally. Not everything someone does that harms themselves is self-harm; if I trip on the stairs and crack a rib, if I drink myself to liver failure, or if I amputate my finger because I mistakenly suppose it is gangrenous, these are all acts that harm myself, but not self-harm - just as (for example) Christian Scientists aren't scientists. Pinkbeast (talk) 01:31, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019[edit]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Joe Jackson (manager), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

You seem to have issues with referencing BLP content, you might just want to stay away from them - FlightTime (open channel) 18:37, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joel Berghult[edit]

The article Joel Berghult has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SSSB (talk) 10:16, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source has now been added Michael14375 (talk) 10:41, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Joel Berghult. --Ronz (talk) 16:02, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lil Pump[edit]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Lil Pump. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Roboting (talk) 21:59, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Lil Pump. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. StaticVapor message me! 21:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images[edit]

Hi there. Just a few points about images:

Images default to 220px, and should only be resized for a good reason.
A vertically long image can be easily be resized by adding "upright".
Non-free images have strict guidelines regarding their use in articles.
Images should ideally be aligned to the right of the page (though this is not always possible or ideal).

Please see MOS:IMAGES for more details. I hope this helps. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:29, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Lil Pump. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced content[edit]

With this edit at 6ix9ine you added that this performer was a "songwriter", and added this source to support your edit (it didn't). In your next edit, you removed the source, but left the edit stating he was a songwriter. What is your source to support this? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:33, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with this edit at NikkieTutorials you added that this performer's "gold year" was 2015 and "diamond year" was 2018. What was your source for this data? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I added a source to NikkiTutorials and why wasn't the source I added to 6ix9ine valid? It says he wrote the song in the source. Michael14375 (talk) 19:54, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to have added the source to NikkiTutorials after I wrote you, and at 6ix9ine you in fact removed the source but left the edit. Is this correct? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:14, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

That is not correct, I did not remove the source I just moved it to the infobox in the genre section Michael14375 (talk) 21:08, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, with this edit at Jeffree Star you wrote about their YouTube account: "which he started on February 14 2006". You used this source to support your edit. Where in the source cited does it say this? Magnolia677 (talk) 20:18, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing that out I changed it now Michael14375 (talk) 21:11, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lil Pump, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Offset (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

XXXTentacion[edit]

Hello sir, I am a long knowing fan of the late rapper XXXTENTACION. And my concerns to this page that nothing about the information about the rapper, but the picture that symbolizes the rapper. You have his mugshot up there that was from 2016. Why not have his last knowing picture from 2018 that was recently released? I’m honestly appalled by seeing his mugshot to symbolize who he was. Yes he was on the controversial around those times, however, he tried to change his late before his death. The last 6 months of his life he just wanted to help everyone, he was always so positive. I just wanted to let you know that I just feel a little offended because y’all are focusing on the things he did instead of who he was. LLJahseh618 (talk) 17:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the one that uploaded the photo, his mugshots were the only pictures of him uploaded to Wikipedia. There was a Wikipedia profile pic of him that wasn't a mugshot a while ago, it must've got taken down for copyright violations. Michael14375 (talk) 00:20, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Content dispute[edit]

At Avicii, you have added and then re-added the same piece of information about his death, despite multiple editors removing what you have added. To avoid continued edit warring about your edit, you are welcome to comment at Talk:Avicii#Cause of death. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:57, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks. Michael14375 (talk) 19:59, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nationality[edit]

Please don't link peoples' nationalities per WP:OVERLINK, and this field should only really be used in infoboxes for subjects with multiple citizenships or perhaps those who have ones unconnected to their birthplace (i.e. American parents raising their child in that country after he/she was born somewhere else). SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 02:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, thanks.Michael14375 (talk) 04:01, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mark Labbett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 14:20, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:YouTube channels launched in 2019[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:YouTube channels launched in 2019 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:39, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

August 2019[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Railfan23 (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure![edit]

Hi Michael14375! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:06, Saturday, August 24, 2019 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

August 2019[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Sylvester Stallone; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Michael14375 reported by User:FlightTime Phone (Result: ). Thank you. - FlightTime Phone (open channel) 18:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for John Kirby (attorney)[edit]

On 5 October 2019, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article John Kirby (attorney), which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.

— Martin (MSGJ · talk) 05:32, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fall Guys Ultimate Knockout logo.svg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fall Guys Ultimate Knockout logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lil Pump has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Lil Pump has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nikocado Avocado birthplace[edit]

Thank you for helping me with my edit. I did not want to cite the websites that says where in Ukraine Nick was born in, and I appreciate it. Chidie345 (talk) 19:55, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Willy's Chocolate Experience, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Can't see any sources that describe the website as being mostly AI-generated text, please add one as a footnote if you've got it. Belbury (talk) 17:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]