User talk:User1267183728390127891247/Archive 1

Speedy deletion nomination of Vikkstar123

Hello User1267183728390127891247,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Vikkstar123 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 01:24, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

Please disclose your affiliation with UK's vodafone for purposefully adding promotional material in 5G page

Are you a marketeer of UK's vodafone? Why would you add promotional material of vodafone separately under an entire section in 5G page? Your action raises suspicion. Srobidx (talk) 22:05, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Hi, No I am not affiliated with Vodafone nor is it promotional material. I thought it would be appropriate to put it. User1267183728390127891247 (talk) 13:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Your recent contributions

Hello. Your recent contributions for the UK on the mobile network operators in Europe page are not in the right place.

You have added a list of some virtual network operators which the Wikipedia page is not about - as you can see, no other country has MVNOs listed on these articles for any continent. You should instead just provide a link to the article about MVNOs in the UK like it was done before.

Additionally, you have removed VoLTE and some others from the table which is meant to provide all information about the operator and placed it in the introduction above.

Also, you have added 5G to networks which don’t yet have it and so it looks like you’re promoting them instead of contributing facts as of now to the Wikipedia article.

I think these changes need to be reversed. Laurene1 (talk) 20:55, 14 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Lauren, I’m not aware of the other countries but I felt that MVNOs should be mentioned as they do represent quite a majority of people in the UK, if you feel that it is unnecessary, I completely understand and you can undo it.

In regards to VoLTE and others, I moved them to the introduction as all the MNOs supported them and I found them pointless to mention them all separately, carrier by carrier since a baseline introduction would’ve sufficed.

You also had an issue with the information regarding 5G. I have seen other countries, previously, on this wiki page which had mentioned the 5G bands/frequency despite not being launched yet and personally, I would feel it IS promotional material if they were NOT mentioned. All the networks have the right to launch 5G whenever they wish since they have the appropriate bands/frequency.

Overall I do feel that my edits were justified but as a goodwill I will be making some edits to the UK section - please check whether you find them better or not.

Edit: I have not made any significant changes as I feel your edits will do!

Hi again,

Sorry if I came across as completely unfriendly but I do think some of the edits were useful and that is why I didn’t return the article to exactly how it was before.

I understand that MVNOs have now a great number of customers in the UK but the page is specifically about operators and so MVNOs should preferably be listed in another article. MVNOs are not listed on any continent’s page as I can remember when I used to edit these articles on my old account. However, I think having a link to the article about MVNOs in the UK is very helpful and so it should stay. Laurene1 (talk) 18:44, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi that’s fine, I completely understand. Also I’m pretty sure other continents did have MVNO - Japan has MVNOs but not to the extent which I did, which sparked the idea 😃.

(16 August 2019)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Friday Sermon (MTA 1), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 4K (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:27, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Anupam. I noticed that you recently removed content from Urdu without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Anupam^Talk 21:52, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Anupam^Talk 21:53, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Pakistani MNOs

Hi User1267183728390127891247,

Your edit increased the table size just to add 2G/3G/4G labels, which are already stated by the technology mentioned in front of each frequency.

GPRS/EDGE = 2G

UMTS/HSPA = 3G

LTE/LTE-A = 4G

So the edits were redundant. I haven't changed any of the table formatting to keep it consistent with the design of the entire article as all the other tables for other countries are in the same format.

Furthermore, the frequencies are in need of updating, and I'm just waiting on a new frequency allocation chart from PTA and FAB so I can update them.

--Murtaza2000 (talk) 08:20, 12 January 2020 (UTC)

@Murtaza2000: i stumbled upon this looking for something else, i'm not sure which article this was about? but for a general audience 3/4/5G certainly makes more sense than those codes. Irtapil (talk) 17:40, 11 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi, it was for List of MNOs Asia - PakistanUser1267183728390127891247 (talk) 02:59, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Please add

Please add some tourist places of attraction like atta abad lake, wadi neelam, k2, khunjrab pass, saifal malook lake, siri pae, shandoor polo ground etc. in demographic section of pakistan because all visitor on wikipedia should know about pakistan Mnadeemims (talk) 07:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Kashmir Conflict Page

I spent a lot of time collection all the information and the references and editing the Kashmir conflict page so that it flow correctly with all the references. Look at the changes that I made that MarkH21 reverted and let me know if there is anything you need me to change. Just let me know what is wrong with my changes and I will change those areas. Thanks Johnleeds1 (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 22:14, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, I'll submit the page when I've added more references to the page. User1267183728390127891247 (talk) 00:03, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Request to update relevant information on article.

Hello User1267183728390127891247, I want to edit/update some parts of the article. I work with the agency representing Jazz. Edits include update of information and removing unnecessary and misleading information and any information added will be cited. Sorry about the edits i made earlier wasn't aware of the right way. Looking forward to your response. Talhatauqeer (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2020 (UTC) Talha Tauqeer

Hi. Thank you for clearing that up. According to Wikipedia's policy, Wikipedia cannot be used for advertising (see: WP:PROMO). I also advice you to disclose your relationship with Jazz on your User page and as mentioned by another user to not be abruptive when editing. User1267183728390127891247 (talk) 15:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Requesting small help

Hello many greetings,

Requesting your proactive contribution and support in updating Draft:Aurats (word) in relation to the related languages you know well.

Thanks and warm regards

Bookku (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

List of television channels in Pakistan

Hello. Your recent edit to List of television channels in Pakistan appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 14:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi there are other channels on the article listed but don't have their own article. In any case a lot of the Pakistani channels don't have articles and it would be difficult to create articles for all of them just to be able to list them. User1267183728390127891247 (talk) 15:01, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

LalaMusa Page - Deletion of Suri Sehgal

Hi! I see that you have recently removed Suri Sehgal from notable people's section without any explanation. Suri Sehgal is a famous Indian-American scientist who grew up in Lalamusa before 1947. Please advise why his name was removed. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Punjabi1234 (talk • contribs) 16:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, I hope you're well. I removed certain names as they were without references. They have now been added back with references. User1267183728390127891247 (talk) 19:42, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Idell (talk) 06:34, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Idell, thanks for your message - I didn't any summary since I didn't think there was any need otherwise I usually do.

Regarding your edit, is there any problem with changing the ISO code to the native script?
- User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 15:46, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

I happened to look at your reply just now; you should ping a user to notify them of your message, unless the thread is on their own talk page.

Regarding your question, I believe you are referring to the Babel userboxes: the standard is to use the ISO language codes. One of the reasons is that for someone who cannot read a language, say Arabic, the ISO code is the only thing that helps them in making sense of the userbox (as the ISO code is written in Latin script, unlike the rest of the text in the userbox which is in Arabic). It is the English language Wikipedia after all. Idell (talk) 11:57, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

@Idell: Hi, thanks for the message, I understand. And yeah I just forgot to ping you on that day. :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 15:00, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah

Hello, User1267183728390127891247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Hi. I don't have any plans to be working on it at the moment. You can remove it from the drafts if you wish. :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 16:53, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Empire AS ^Talk! — is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2020 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Empire AS ^Talk! 19:02, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Empire AS: Thank you Empire AS for you kind message. Happy New Year to you too and I hope that you will be in good health, especially during these uncertain times, Regards User1267183728390127891247 :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 19:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

thanks :) Empire AS ^Talk! 19:11, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy New Year!

Tahaaleem ^Talk— is wishing you a Happy New Year! It's the last day of 2024 and tomorrow will be 2025. Hope the coming year brings pleasures for you. Have a prosperous, enjoyable and a productive 2025. This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the New Year cheer by adding {{subst:New Year 2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Tahaaleem ^Talk 19:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

@Tahaaleem: Thank you Tahaaleem for you kind message. Happy New Year to you too and I hope that you will be in good health, especially during these uncertain times, Regards User1267183728390127891247 :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 19:09, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Request

Hi can you please start discussion at South Waziristan and North Waziristan article's to move them on South Waziristan District & North Waziristan District like other former merged districts of FATA, Bajaur District, Mohmand District, Khyber District, Kurram District and etc. Ytpks896 (talk) 15:38, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kandahari cap

Hello, User1267183728390127891247,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged Kandahari cap for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative. Also, you may want to consider working on future articles in draft space first, where they cannot be deleted for lacking content.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 22:28, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

@Meatsgains: Thank you. It was a redirect which I wanted to remove but I forgot the code to mark a page for a speedy deletion, so instead had just decided to remove the redirect code, Thank you.:
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 22:31, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Ah, I see! Meatsgains^(talk) 23:06, 9 April 2021 (UTC)

Request help

Hi the same accounts are now vandalizing the Chapli kebab page changing its location from south asia and pakistan to central asia and afghanistan. Can you do something about it and request protection for the page.

Sindhi Cap

Hi can you please review Sindhi Cap a user changed page name without any census or talk. Ytpks896 (talk) 08:28, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

@Ytpks896: Hi Thanks for the message, I'm not sure the reasons behind the edit, I'm assuming it's good faith so if you would like to dispute the edits, you can message @SharqHabib: on his talk page and ask him about the edits, Thanks! :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 13:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Contact

Hi, can i talk with you in private via email or anything, thanks

@Dudebro777: Hi, you can contact me via Wiki's email service or you can continue the discussion here if you wish. :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 18:00, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah

Hello, User1267183728390127891247. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Al-Shirkatul Islamiyyah".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:13, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

September 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely to prevent abuse.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public. You may instead email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-enwikimedia.org with your username and appeal.

---

Administrators: CheckUsers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. Therefore, a Checkuser must be consulted before this block can be removed. Administrators undoing checkuser blocks without permission or the prior approval from a checkuser risk having their administrator rights removed by the Arbitration Committee (per this announcement).

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:23, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

User1267183728390127891247 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hang on a minute, I don't understand the reason behind the block. Yes my other account is TheGr8Scorpio, but I have always kept it separate and had even disclosed it on the user page that it was an alt. However these accusations are blatantly false. What smear campaign is going on, that I should be aware of? Is this account being banned, simply because I have come across and possible interacted with Abbasi786786's edits, previously and he has also voiced his opinion on the thread on Panjshir conflict, which I didn't even know took place because I had basically given up after being blocked from editing even on my own talk page on TheGr8Scorpio. This literally affirms my statement that the users who edited the Panjshir conflict page in support of the Indian Media references, were in fact only there for the endorsement of Indian Media being used as references for Pakistan - straight propaganda, and not out of good faith, because even after getting me blocked, they have decided to list some other accounts who I have never come across, who have apparently voted in the thread, and relate them to me because they share my opinion? What is going on here, where does this account come into discussion? And all this for, asking for a reliable reference? With the same logic, in that case, can you check every single account that voted in favour of India Today for possible sock puppetry, too please, or at least Applodion, AnM2002, Georgethedragonslayer and TolWol56?

P.s I find it hilarious that TolWol56 actually acknowledges the tweet which debunks their beloved and reliable India Today, yet the focus is somehow still on me, how pathetic.

Accept reason:

Block reduced to one week and on the condition that you use the User1267183728390127891247 account only and also don't edit while logged out. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:21, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

• The primary way that the use of both accounts is a breach of policy is that you used the User1267183728390127891247 account while the TheGr8Scorpio was blocked from editing which is block evasion. Additionally, on TheGr8Scorpio's user page, you state that the two accounts will be used on different pages. You've used the TheGr8Scorpio account then used the User1267183728390127891247 account on the same page (Kashmir Premier League (Pakistan) and others) which doesn't fit with the commitment you made on the TheGr8Scorpio user page to edit in different areas and does not comply with the sockpuppetry policy. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
  • @Callanecc: I assumed the block wouldn't affect this account, so long I didn't decide to edit any pages, that aren't related to Panjshir or politics basically. I agree that was my fault, and I should've read the WP policy regarding that. As far my argument that I have kept those account separate, again I had made it clear on the talk page that it was an accident, I didn't mean to use the opposite account, and especially in that circumstance, I wouldn't want to anyways! Same was the case for Kashmir Premier League, and you can confirm that the time logs were similar to both accounts, the reason being I was disputing Kashmir Premier League on one account, and had been monitoring the page for some time for vandalism, whereas I had a dispute with another user on Land Borders article on a different account. I had them mixed up for a brief period. As for the other edits, there were bound to be some overlaps, as I had planned to transition from this account to that account, and they were essentially the starting edits, which were pretty minor.
    
    P.s does ping work when blocked?:
    >> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 20:47, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
    • I would be willing to reduce the block length two one week which is after the block you were evading would have expired. I'm only willing to do that on the condition that you only edit with the User1267183728390127891247 account (not any other account and not logged out). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
      • @Callanecc: I am willing to accept that :
        >> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 09:11, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

January 2022

@El C and Bbb23: This user is engaging in the same disruption over which he was blocked on his sockpuppet account just 4 months ago. He is making  the same disruptive edits [1][2][3] after making sure that he can't get consensus for them.[4][5][6] This comes after a similar editor was article blocked for falsely smearing Indian sources as unreliable,[7] where as this user is considering even the WP:RS from Afghanistan, Iran and elsewhere to be unreliable.[8] Ultimately he is a WP:1AMer at this stage. I think a page block from Panjshir conflict or a topic ban is warranted. Abhishek0831996 (talk) 01:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Abhishek0831996: Nice try, but I was unaware of the rules at the time, and this account wasn't being used to contribute to the Panjshir conflict page, and it wasn't to say that I couldn't contribute to the Panjshir conflict after my alt was indefinitely banned. @Callanecc: reduced my ban for this reason, and I don't use my other alt since it's banned and I don't have any other alts. And no it's not a smear, it's the truth, Indian sources are unreliable when it comes to reporting on issues related to Pakistan and (to a lesser extent) vice versa. I would never use Indian Media to quote an incident relating to Pakistan, or Pakistani source to reference an incident relating to India. And when you consider the fact that it was Indian Media that brought this out all of sudden, with only backing from Iranian Media, and then getting called out for making false claims, and using fake video footage for their TV broadcast, passing it off as 'attacks by Pakistani air force', at a time when global media outlets were present in Afghanistan - it's quite suspicious, to say the least that only Indian and Iranian media mention these claims. Or do you have any sources to refute this, that aren't quoting Indian or Iranian Media? In fact, India Today cited a fake twitter account, and is one of the references being cites. The Week is another reference being used, which bases its entire report quoting Aamaj News, which itself quoted an Iranian politician, with no fundamental proof. That's authentic to you? Perhaps the essay Wikipedia:Propaganda#Extraordinary claims is worth a read.

Also you have quite an audacity, considering you decided to revert my edit, DESPITE knowing that there has been a huge discussion previously and the fact that the other editor didn't object. So you are equally at fault. :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 02:37, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@Abhishek0831996: Also on what grounds do you revert my edit, considering all you had to do was provide any other neutral and trustworthy source? I literally said that in my edit summary, that I was happy to have it reverted, if credible sources were cited and use those instead. You didn't. So you are trying revert this for no reason, other than solidifying or normalising Indian media being used as a reference for incidents relating to Pakistan, am I right?  :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 02:42, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Figure it out on the article talk, please, you two. If at an impasse, consult WP:RSN. User1267183728390127891247, Indian sources are not inherently unreliable when it comes to Pakistan, even if there's some bias. Israeli newspapers are cited about WP:ARBPIA all the time. There's no reason this should be any different for WP:ARBIPA (for either Indian or Pakistani sources). So, your reasoning, in itself, is not a valid grounds for removal. A more detailed, and specific, explanation would be required (maybe it was provided already, I dunno). You two could also compromise with something like in-line attribution. HTH. El_C 13:17, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@El C and Abhishek0831996: I'm not sure about the situation surrounding Israeli papers and Arab events, but when it comes to South Asia, Indian Media has an abhorrent bias. I would argue it is one of the worst in world. Fake news and misinformation campaigns by Indian Media has been widely reported, for instance [9], [10], [11].

When it comes to compromise, I'm the only one trying to come to a compromise. This was my compromise, even on my alt, that bring a neutral source - I don't get what's so bad about that. I'll go even further, @Abhishek0831996: you can keep the Indian references, if you can provide a neutral, reliable source that makes same claims, without it being a quotation and was reported at a similar time, and actually gives some evidence for it. But compromises can't just come from me, he has to come to a compromise too, which he clearly doesn't want to. He just wants to keep the Indian references. How is that fair?:
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 13:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Again, figure it out on the article talk, if at an impasse, consult WP:RSN. But, no, you can't make these generalizations about Indian sources like that, all on your own, as the sole basis for removal. You need specifics that pertain to this case, rather than bring up Indian sources' reliability RE: Pakistan overall. If you do want to have that broader discussion, you could run an WP:RFC about it at RSN (possibly, there's already been one or more, so maybe search RSN first to see what was said on this topic thus far). Also, in-line attribution would be a compromise, no? El_C 14:23, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

@El C: Starting another discussion on the talk page would be like the 4th discussion. There was a soft vote held at the very beginning, where more people were in favour of not using the Indian sources. However, we had people with a specific POV, who were clearly very keen on just highlighting the brilliance of Indian Media (literally), and disregarded any bias that it has, yet the same people are accusing me of having a specific view point. It would be futile for me to start another discussion. I also mentioned this the when you decided to ban my alt. I guess going to WP:RSN or WP:RFC, is probably worth a shout :/ :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 20:52, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 13:19, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Your SPI

As a clerk action, I have tagged Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Abhishek0831996 for speedy deletion as a nationality-based personal attack masquerading as an SPI. There is a large editnotice on every SPI page beginning "Do not make accusations without providing evidence. Doing so is a personal attack and will likely be summarily removed." Your only evidence at the SPI appears to be that the three editors share (what you perceive to be) a pro-India POV, and that they have overlapped on a few pages (which on its own is not evidence of sockpuppetry). This is an unacceptable attempt to use the SPI process to further a content dispute. I see that El_C notified you of the India/Pakistan discretionary sanctions nine hours after you filed that SPI. You should consider yourself lucky that that was the order of events, as if it had been the other way around, I would have half a mind to take you to arbitration enforcement for your unfounded allegation of a sockpuppet smear campaign maligning Muslims and Pakistan. Please consider this your only warning for such conduct at SPI, or really anywhere. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 04:52, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@Tamzin: I will heed your advice, but my request for an investigation wasn't just primarily centred around the dispute at Panjshir conflict, I had suspicions which began at Panjshir conflict, but after looking through the edits of multiple users, as well as the time when edits made plus the topics they were made on, is what furthered my suspicions. If this does not constitute an investigation, then I apologise but 1. this is my first investigation - I had only submitted the request because I felt that there could be a case, 2. I would have done this earlier on but I didn't know how to, and since the dispute at Panjshir conflict risen again, I remembered this as well. Also, I ask this with a good intention, what is so bad about making this statement: smear campaign maligning Muslims and Pakistan ?:
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 05:02, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

The fact that several people disagree with you isn't evidence of sockpuppetry, especially if the thing they're agreeing on is a pretty common point of view. Editors overlapping on multiple pages also isn't evidence of sockpuppetry, especially if those pages are all in the same topic area or same closely-related topic areas. If you want to make the case that three editors, each with more than 1,000 edits, are all sockpuppets of each other, you really need to meticulously go through their edits and make the case why they are clearly the same person. You should read User:Blablubbs/How to file a good SPI for more information.

That said, that's not why I had the SPI deleted. We don't delete SPIs just for being bad. I had it deleted because it seemed to boil down to "They are all pro-India [implicitly: they are all Indian], therefore they are sockpuppets." That is not acceptable. Furthermore I would hope it's obvious why it's bad to accuse people, without evidence, of a smear campaign maligning Muslims and Pakistan. It's an accusation of bigotry! That is one of the most serious kinds of personal attack you can make. How would you feel if someone accused you of engaging in a smear campaign maligning Hindus and India? Personally I would be deeply offended by either of those accusations. WP:NPA#WHATIS notes "Serious accusations require serious evidence". If you have evidence that editors are bigoted against Muslims and/or Pakistanis, you should present that evidence at AE, ANI, or, if private, by email to ArbCom.

If you want to take the time to go through a whole bunch of edits and pick out the diffs that, in your opinion, clearly show that this is all one person, rather than just three people who have shared interests and a similar point of view, you may re-file the case, provided you do not include any accusations that you cannot back up with evidence, especially accusations of bigotry. That said, if your evidence is not much better than what you've already presented, you shouldn't bother, because there's really nothing actionable there. Look at interactions between any two editors with more than 1,000 edits who are active in the same topic area, you'll get dozens of results. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (she/they) 05:18, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

@Tamzin: Noted, since you say that it's unlikely that my evidence is insufficient, I'll try and go through it more deeply and submit a new case, if I feel the same. :
>> User1267183728390127891247^{(Send a Message?)} 05:29, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Gilgit-Baltistan

can you add map of Gilgit-Baltistan in Pakistan? Just like (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ladakh) this, including Kashmir and Pakistan map

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.204.4.156 (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Also add Seal and flag in the Infobox settlement like other provinces — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.204.4.156 (talk) 13:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)