User talk:Truth721

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Ponyobons mots 21:36, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I remember you Ponyo. I actually made one key error in the past when I first started out and got blocked early too harshly for very little. I (Undid edits twice in a row) after being unblocked when edit earring with another sock who is a persistent edit warrer. My first block was harsh. And waited for over 6 months for an appeal and lost patience after waiting 6 months and nobody responding to my appeal. So yes, my second mistake was ignoring the block but I never had intentions to vandalise or wreck Wikipedia. And that's a fact.

However you keep noticing Me and blocking me whenever I am on political topics but I haven't actually inherently broken the rules yet get in your target lens. I am not wrong to state that context is necessary to point out most global companies are not divesting from Russia and such context is true information. Yet the old me would had edit warred to add that in. But the New me is different in that I am willing to go to noticeboards to ask for consensus first if nobody can agree. I haven't broken the 3rr rule nor vandalised. Yet you seem to want to get rid of me to not let such real essential information be shown. Are you are afraid of the information because it's true? Ad I feel punished and targeted only because I dare to mention that most multinationals are not divesting from Russia. And people should not be misled to think that it's unusual for companies to not be doing that. [1] I actually do try to improve Wikipedia genuinely Truth721 (talk) 21:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]