User talk:Topiarydan

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Kuru ^talk 15:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so it's a belated welcome. Great job on the ~~Risk Management Information Systems - RMIS~~ article you just added. You may want to delete the misspelled version of the article ~~(Risk Management Information Systems - RIMS~~) - or I can tag it for deletion for you. Just let me know if I can help! Kuru ^talk 15:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, page moved to Risk Management Information Systems, and I've requested deletion for the mis-spelled version of the redirect. JubalHarshaw 19:45, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a ton JubalHarshaw for the update

Always glad to help! JubalHarshaw 16:58, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dennis Duffy[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dennis Duffy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, articles #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. _JD^talk 09:19, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tags[edit]

As far as I know there is no specific process to deal with a simple flag such as the one about missing Primarysources. Itcan simply be removed by any editor who comes to the conslusion that the flagged problem has been addressed and then all the usual procedures apply in cas of disaggrements. Tikiwont 10:31, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Topiary Communications[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Accounts used solely for blatant self-promotion may be blocked indefinitely without further warning.

For more details, please read the Conflict of Interest guideline. Thank you. -- Ronz 04:20, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policy for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. [1] --Ronz 19:33, 29 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest[edit]

I've started a report here. Please consider responding there. --Ronz 18:51, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, I'm a sysop who checked out Ronz's report at the noticeboard. His concerns are right on target. I recommend you post suggested edits to article talk pages instead of directly to articles where a conflict of interest could create the appearance of impropriety. You probably mean well, but your editing practices aren't in accordance with Wikipedia site standards. Have a look at the what Wikipedia is not policy and the neutral point of view policy, also the linking guideline and the single-purpose account guideline in addition to the conflict of interest guideline he already mentioned. I don't see an improvement after several friendly warnings, which leaves the unwelcome alternative of page protections and user blocks if problems continue. Durova^Charge! 23:20, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Hello. Your recent edit to Brother Rice High School (Chicago) appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Gab4gab (talk) 00:49, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]