User talk:Tim Isaksson

This is Tim Isaksson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Noise (in human judgment) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Noise (in human judgment). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:57, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Noise (in human judgment) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Noise (in human judgment). Thanks! Tame (talk) 14:14, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise (in human judgment) (July 23)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CodeLyoko was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise (in human judgment) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise (in human judgment), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CodeLyoko^talk 18:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tim Isaksson! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CodeLyoko^talk 18:52, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CodeLyoko, Tame and Theroadislong. I will look into it in a few weeks. /Tim Isaksson (talk) 05:43, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Noise in human judgment[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:Noise in human judgment indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:08, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment (August 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robertsky was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Literature review.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– robertsky (talk) 06:57, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of the book Noise – A Flaw in Human Judgment (2021).jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the book Noise – A Flaw in Human Judgment (2021).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:37, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Stefan2. Duly noted. I will henceforth upload such images only after the intended page for use has been published. /Tim Isaksson (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment (October 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Wingwatchers were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 19:22, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from WikiProject Psychology[edit]

Hi, I noticed you have shown an interest in articles related to psychology.

WikiProject Psychology is a group of experts, students and enthusiasts improving Wikipedia articles with any connection to psychology. We have a noticeboard where you can ask for help, or where your input will be very welcome. To stay in touch, add the WikiProject page to your watchlist (here's how to do this). You might also find these links helpful:

If you make big improvements to a psychology-related article, or small improvements to many, you will earn our lasting gratitude, or even a Barnstar. I hope you enjoy your time on Wikipedia.

Xurizuri (talk) 11:50, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise (human judgment) (October 18)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise (human judgment) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise (human judgment), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment has been accepted[edit]

Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a fantastic rating for a new article, and places it among the top 3% of accepted submissions — major kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Wingwatchers (talk) 00:10, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Noise (human judgment) (December 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wingwatchers was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft reads too much like an essay. The text has to be converted into prose format rather than bullet points, and avoid naming sections with over-extended descriptions, like "What noise is and its relationship to bias."

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Noise (human judgment) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Noise (human judgment), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wingwatchers (talk) 04:21, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Advice[edit]

As reviewing administrator, I think I should advise you that we are not likely to accept two articles with overlapping content, one about the book, and one about the specific subject of the book, presented according to that book. There are two possible directions: keep some information about the theoretical approach in the article in the book and remove the other, or write a minimal article on the book and link it to the general article for discussion of the theory. I would very strongly suggest focussing on the article on the book; I have checked the references in the article on the subject, and most of the references are either by Kahneman, or are about human error in general.

The function of a reviewer is to predict whether the article will pass AfD. I doubt that the article on the theory will. It might be useful if rewritten as a general article on human error, not highlighting his theoretical approach.I am of course aware of Daniel Kahneman as a very famous economist, but that would not justify a separate article unless there were multiple other significant works discussing specifically this particular approach. DGG ( talk ) 17:23, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DGG,

I see. I will focus on the book article. I actually began by writing just one article, but then another reviewer suggested splitting it into the two. Of course, that first draft was more about the concept than the book, so I now see that there was a problem from the get go. Thanks for your time

Tim Isaksson (talk) 07:15, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As it happens, I've now read the book and I'm quite impressed. There might be enough for 2, but I agree you should work on the book first, and then see if you can write a bio which just mentions the book among other aspects. DGG ( talk ) 10:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DGG,

Sorry for my late reply. Nice that you like the book. Alright, yes I may return to this in the future. Tim Isaksson (talk) 12:09, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Noise (human judgment)[edit]

Hello, Tim Isaksson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Noise (human judgment), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Noise (human judgment)[edit]

Hello, Tim Isaksson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Noise".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]