User talk:Thitut

This is Thitut's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spaceflight Simulator (December 12)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not enough sources to satisfy notability requirements. No reception section at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Spaceflight Simulator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Spaceflight Simulator, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

_{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:58, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I do not expected such a quick review. Though I expect for it to not been accepted as there were little to none secondary source available. So, should I left this draft until more information prevails, or do you have any suggestions. That would be greatly appreciate. Thitut (talk) 15:05, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

sfn means 'smart footnotes'[edit]

Hi, Thitut! Noticed this edit on the Ingenuity page. Presumably you did not understood what you did by returning this common <ref name="flight14preview">. Let me explain you. The common-style reference included in this footnote contains:

Grip, Håvard (September 15, 2021). "Flying on Mars Is Getting Harder and Harder". Mars Helicopter Tech Demo. NASA. Retrieved 18 September 2021.

while the 'sfn'-style that you deleted ({{sfn|Status 334}}>) was addressing to this position in the organized 'status reports' section of the bibliographic section:

Håvard Grip (September 15, 2021). "Flying on Mars Is Getting Harder and Harder". Status #334. NASA/JPL. Retrieved September 15, 2021.

Destination of both links is the same. However, your link is ~~visible~~ buried among ~150 other footnotes with almost no chance to be used by readers to follow up the other reports on 'Ingenuity' At the same time the 'smart' note is called smart not only because it helps to save a hundred of bytes and makes the text more readable in the edit mode. It is called 'smart' also because it introduces a civilized way of creating bibliographic list synchronously.

I shall not revert your edit. I've already invested too much time for improving this article in en-wiki. For me it's enough, that the same article in ru-wiki has recently got the status WP:GA, so I don't have plans to become a sort of watchdog for edits in its en-wiki version. On the contrary, I hope (and wish) you first to read the explanation, what the Template:SfnRef does, and rollback this edit yourself, only on the basis of full understanding of what you delete. — Regards, Cherurbino (talk) 09:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! I’m sorry. It’s entirely my fault and I should have read the Template documentation first. My sincere apologies here. I will be sure to revert it as soon as possible. I just working on my own translation (Thai) and noticed that the version I copied is different from what it’s now and I thought someone had broken the reference. Thank you very much for an explanation and I shall make sure such mistake doesn’t happen again. Also thanks for your contribution in both English and Russian Wikipedia. I don’t think people said this enough but your contribution help create something truly noble and I think that the more frequent Wikipedian had not been thanked enough. So thank you. And sorry if I contribute to your WikiStress — With my sincerest apology, Thitut (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC) Thitut (talk) 10:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Spaceflight Simulator[edit]

Hello, Thitut. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Spaceflight Simulator, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]