User talk:Theavatar3

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Theavatar3, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Scientizzle 18:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Science[edit]

If you find this article tautological, please explain why on its talk page. Also, Chris, as a self-admitted "previously-banned user" (hmm...wonder who?), you'll find yourself on a short leash... -- Scientizzle 18:29, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I instead typed some junk up at talk:objectivity (science). Theavatar3 23:51, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ref desk edit[edit]

Hi. You added 'Perhaps Vanatu's savages are not so noble' to a discussion on the Humanities ref desk. This strikes me as precisely the kind of 'joke' which, per the discussion on the talk page, we should be trying to avoid. The term 'savage' is widely regarded as offensive, and the comment adds nothing of value. Please remove it. Yours, Sam Clark 19:32, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is done. And I will try to be more informative in future discussion, of course. Theavatar3 23:52, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Sam Clark 09:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quotation[edit]

Avatar, where is your quote "All books are purely autobiographical." from? Crisco 1492 06:29, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's just something stupid I submitted, on the spur of the moment. Theavatar3 17:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sweet. ONly reason I ask is because a friend and I have quote wars every once in a a while, and your's sounded good. (I'll probably still try it, see what she thinks he3.) Thanx! Crisco 1492 23:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

u r most welcome! Theavatar3 23:21, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Reference desk[edit]

This page is for talking about the reference desk, not for general chit chat. Friday (talk) 22:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm -- I see your point. I will be more mindful of keeping my unamusing musings to myself in the future. Theavatar3 22:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Friday (talk) 22:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD[edit]

Perhaps someone has tampered with the edit log; did you just {{AfD}} your own page?--Anthony.bradbury 22:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did. Theavatar3 23:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been blocked at least twice during 2006, by:[edit]

This user is a known sockpuppet (internet) of:[edit]

page-protect vandal and abusive troll user:cjwright79

Confusing?[edit]

There's some confusing, apparently inaccurate information on your talk page about being blocked and protected. What's the deal? Friday (talk) 19:36, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The deal is -- Wikipedia is pointless, and not pointless.

user:Consumed Crustacean[edit]

Hi -- can you please unblock my principal account (user:cjwright79) now, or sometime in the future? Thanks -- Chris.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theavatar3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This request is for user:cjwright79. I don't care about all my sockpuppet accounts, you can delete them if you want, but I might as well get my main one back in working condition. Right now, I can't edit anything except this talk page. Thanks in advance -- Chris.

Decline reason:

Nein. -- —Pilotguy (push to talk) 21:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.