User talk:The Sausage Grinder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hi The Sausage Grinder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! ~Kvng (talk) 22:04, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics[edit]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

  • adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
  • comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
  • follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
  • comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
  • refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

The 500 edit restriction applies whether the article is protected or not. Please respect this. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved my question about the jew tagging to the talk page, thanks. If I'm technically not supposed to edit that page, I think it needs a little lock icon added to it. For a new user, its hard to tell what is secretly locked. The Sausage Grinder (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Articles are only locked if they are primarly about the Arab-Israel conflict. HRW is broader than just that conflict so it's not protected, but any content in articles coverign the Arab-Israel conflict requires 500 edits to modify or add whether it is protected or not. Hemiauchenia (talk) 17:21, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Other accounts[edit]

What other accounts do you have at Wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 13:58, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
--Blablubbs (talk) 18:54, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]