User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2022/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
See you tomorrow
It's time to sleep now. See you tomorrow. Trusci (talk) 15:10, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hello again, I recommend you to follow the guideline
1. Improve, Don't Remove. If something doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards, try to fix the problem rather than just remove what's broken. (Nothing stops new contributors from coming back like having all their hard work end up in the bit bucket.)
- I would appreciate if you try to improve the article, not just removing the whole contribution. It might be a somewhat impetuous decision, not going over the contents and references I added. Trusci (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
- I would appreciate if you could explain at the article’s talk page like what I did above. Please read my arguments and reply to the point I am insisting on. Trusci (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
Notice
You might miss my questions at the talks. The talks would be much more productive if you answer to the questions quickly.
@Tgeorgescu, don’t you agree to the argument “Scientific terminology must be defined in the way scientists use in scientific literatures”? Trusci (talk) 15:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
@Tgeorgescu, let me check it first. Have you ever read the Pearson’s article cited? Trusci (talk) 15:10, 9 November 2022 (UTC) Trusci (talk) 09:36, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
--Trusci (talk) 09:38, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Trusci: See WP:RECENTISM. You conflate merely promising research with established scientific fact. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think so. Further, neither do the other editers, from what I've seen. More specificity is required to persuade people. --Trusci (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Trusci: You have persuaded no one that your content needs to be included. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- And now it seems more clear that you might ignore the questions. It is not the answer. Don’t you want to answer the questions? These are not difficult to answer at all though. --Trusci (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Trusci: I am not a servant who answers people's questions. Contributions to Wikipedia are voluntary (but not arbitrary).
- The simple answer is that Wikipedia is an academically conservative website, you cannot publish bleeding edge research here. If it will become widely accepted, then you may publish it inside Wikipedia. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:30, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- And now it seems more clear that you might ignore the questions. It is not the answer. Don’t you want to answer the questions? These are not difficult to answer at all though. --Trusci (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Trusci: You have persuaded no one that your content needs to be included. tgeorgescu (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- I don’t think so. Further, neither do the other editers, from what I've seen. More specificity is required to persuade people. --Trusci (talk) 23:02, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
What to do about this editor
[Special:Contributions/Jehoiakimin] Doug Weller talk 15:41, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Doug Weller: I don't know. My heavy-handed approach does not always seem to work. tgeorgescu (talk) 16:51, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ani asking for help with the editor? Doug Weller talk 17:02, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
DRN
Hi, I opened a DRN for Book of Daniel here
Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Book of Daniel Billyball998 (talk) 00:07, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Dr. Yosef Ben
I was not making any bias edits. I was making impartial modifications because it seems to me that the page itself is fashioned in such a way as to slander his name. 66.69.71.237 (talk) 01:44, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
- WP:FRINGE and WP:GEVAL are of application. tgeorgescu (talk) 01:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)