User talk:Tgeorgescu/Archives/2020/May

Alexander in the Book of Daniel

Are you OK with the sources provided for Alexander being described in the Book of Daniel as the Greek King who will conquer Persia?

They are in the Book of Daniel talk page.

I won't ask if you are happy with them because I know you would not be.

Toodles!18:17, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Brilliant

Hi, only say this talk page edit of yours today [1]. Absolutely brilliant and spot on, rare to see fringe pushers exposed in such a short and humorous way. Have a nice day and keep up the good work! Jeppiz (talk) 09:48, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

So you're that zealot that gives wikipedia its bad rep

I added the words and phrases from works i also listed with references. These people i cited from and their works are well recognised. By you calling it pseudo-science only goes to show how subjective you are on this matter. If you are here to promote pseudoscience, extremism, fundamentalism or conspiracy theories, we're not interested in what you have to say.

I would advise you to look in a mirror — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seba3586 (talk • contribs) 22:53, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, well, "if" means that it's a conditional statement. I did not state for a fact that you were spreading pseudoscience. Tgeorgescu (talk) 04:52, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Your recent editing history at Nebuchadnezzar II shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Saxophilist (talk) 16:46, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Reasoning

Hello, why do you spend so much time editing articles about religious topics that you don't even believe in? I'm just wondering what your reasons are. Seems a little odd to me. Saxophilist (talk) 19:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@Saxophilist: Every Wikipedian is expected to kowtow to WP:CHOPSY. That's all. Applies to religion, science, politics, history, etc., etc. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:22, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

@Saxophilist:

My wife is an expert, among many other things, in Chaucer. She doesn’t “believe” in Chaucer, although she loves the texts and finds them personally important. There are professors in the university who teach the history of communism; most of them are not communists. Others teach the philosophy of Plato; they are not necessarily Platonists. Others teach the history of 20th century Germany; they aren’t Nazis. Others teach criminology; they aren’t necessary mass murderers. ... And so a scholar of Buddhism is not necessarily Buddhist (the ones I know aren’t); a scholar of American fundamentalism is not necessarily an American fundamentalist (one of my colleagues in that field at UNC is an Israeli Jew); a scholar of the history of Catholicism is not necessarily Roman Catholic (another colleague of mine in that field is, again, somewhat oddly, another Israeli Jew); scholars of Islam are not necessarily Muslim (neither of my colleagues in that field are); etc etc.

— ehrmanblog.org

Quoted by Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:40, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject

• Thanks. See also: Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias —Neutralog (talk) 11:30, 23 May 2020‎ (UTC)