User talk:Storeye

Welcome!

Hello, Storeye, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Fr a ncs2000 11:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bog bodies[edit]

Thanx for the warm welcome! I "take care" of the bog bodies in the German Wikipedia and would like to help out here once in a while... Is there a group of users dedicated to prehistory like in the German Wikipedia? Kind regards, --Lillyundfreya 11:20, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I am aware of, but that doesn't prove anything. The closest thing I could find was Wikipedia:WikiProject Archaeology. Storeye 11:26, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Astragalus membranaceus[edit]

Sorry, I reverted your edit today in Astralagus as they just have Astragalus membranaceus as a redirect page going to Astragalus propinquus, which is already listed in the list of Astralagus species. I don't know why they consider A. prop... to be the best name instead of A. memb... I'd rather it were done the other way but I've not found sufficiently notable references to warrant changing both this article and the other two plus all the links. (Wikipedia is a real hassle about that. I thought about making Wild buckwheat into a disambiguation page and listing the Eurasian species by its scientific name but gave up due to the number of link changes involved.)But if you can establish notability to revert my edit then you might want to do the other changes as well.Trilobitealive (talk) 01:33, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, sorry I didn't realise that they were the same species. I do not have much knowledge on the topic and simply noticed that the species name I was looking for wasn't there. I assume there is little harm done in having the page under one name rather than another. Thankyou for clearing this up for me! Storeye (talk) 04:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They get pretty confusing sometimes. Keep up the good work and don't let this sort of thing get you down. I've been reverted many times on different articles and know how frustrating it gets.Trilobitealive (talk) 04:34, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Catullus[edit]

Hi, Storeye. Thank you for you comment at WikiProject Catullus. New voices are always welcome. Please consider joining the project. There are few participants at the moment, yet decisions made on the project’s pages in the next couple of weeks will likely affect the future shape and number of Catullus aricles on Wikipedia. User:WillowW has provided the following areas for discussion:

Hope to see you there. Regards, Aramgar (talk) 14:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

One[edit]

I agree with you about the article on generic 'you' - this article is very loaded. It should be about the 'generic you', but spends half the time lambasting 'one.' Stuffy? Formal? I don't consider 'one' to be stuffy or formal, but 'you' to be both rather vulgar and confusing - but I would not deign to hijack the article on 'one' to promote my own linguistic bias. This article is odd indeed. --It's-is-not-a-genitive (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Fernande Decruck

added a link pointing to French

List of saxophonists

added a link pointing to Classical

Timothy McAllister (saxophonist)

added a link pointing to Rico

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops sorry, I'll be more careful about that. Thanks for the heads up! Storeye (talk) 09:20, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

IP Vandal[edit]

hi Storeye, I thought I'd just let you know that this user is an IP hopping vandal who has been vandalising wikipedia for several years now. He/she has received numerous warnings about his/her disruptive editing and he/she has ignored all of them, so if he/she continues to make non-constructive edits, feel free to revert them without informing him/her about it. JayJ47 (talk) 23:24, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know, I was trying to assume good faith but it does look like vandalism. Storeye (talk) 00:11, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Storeye. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Storeye. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]