User talk:Steveg99

Welcome!

Hello, Steveg99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few more good links for to help you get started:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair 23:27, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quasar[edit]

All right, I responded on the Quasar talk page. Thanos6 08:54, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch[edit]

Thanks, I missed that[1] when I added the others. Hiding T 10:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wolverine's Height[edit]

Nah, nothing has been changed regarding his height. Height and mass within comic books are little tricks artists enjoy playing with. For example, for a good deal of his existence, particularly in the 90's, characters like Cyclops were drawn with the standard bulging and impossibly muscular physique despite the limits that weighing 175 lbs and being 6'3" would have as far as muscular proportion goes. A lot of Marvel characters today seem to be drawn to look more realistic with realistic proportions. In the early 90's, there are artistic representations of Wolverine and Cyclops being standing close to one another with Wolverine barely even coming to the bottom of Cyclops' chest. Same thing really with a character's overall appearance. I bet if you pick up a copy of the X-Men: Messiah Complex Mutant Files, the latest OHOTMU styled book, I'm sure Wolverine'll still be listed at 5'3". I was supposed to get a copy of it but my guy at the comic store fumbled the ball on me. In the future though, I don't think you should bring something like this up in an article's discussion page. It's not really what it's created for. The reason I'm saying this is because some editors, mainly the ones who spend about 99% of their time over on the WP:Comics discussion page arguing over improving the articles, what should be in, what shouldn't be, blah bla, will start hassling you about it. I've been editing for going on 3 years now and trying to reason with those people and just dealing with most of them will quickly suck all the enjoyment out of editing the articles. Try www.marveldatabase.com. It's much more laid back. Thanks Odin's Beard (talk) 00:49, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig.[edit]

Your sig on the Wolverine Talk page lacked a close command for the <small> you used. you need a </small> after to complete the sig, otherwise that 'small' command continues to be recognized, applying to everythign following your sig on the page. ThuranX (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]