User talk:SoftHiss/Archive 1
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Vandal warning
on 1/12/07 you tagged the IP 38.116.11.34 with a vandalism warning. I am a network administration for the company that owns that IP address. Can you tell me which article was vandalized and at what time? We would like to track down the individual and make sure this does not happen again.
Thanks for the barnstar!
I went ahead and added it to my userpage. Crystallina 22:13, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
warm thanks, Natasha, from a fellow coffee addict. dab (𒁳) 17:20, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the Barnstar!
Thanks for the Barnstar! I appreciate the kind gesture ^_^.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:32, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Your notification on WP:AIV
Are you sure what 213.190.195.104 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) does is vandalism? They might just be updating the player information, but I've got no clue about sports. Sandstein 22:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, this is very odd behaviour. I'll apply a brief block. May we rely upon you to revert their edits so far? Thanks, Sandstein 22:54, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Couple of quick reminders
Hi,
When using certain template tags on talk pages, don't forget to substitute with text by adding subst: to the template tag. For example, use {{subst:test}} instead of {{test}}. This reduces server load and prevents accidental blanking of the template.
Also, Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
Thanks! :)
Hbackman 23:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Edit War (Not Really)
I would hardly call it an edit war. In my opinion an edit war is when editors put at least LOGICAL information in and out. This is more like a vandalism war, I've asked that the McDonalds page be semi-protected, becaue I checked and the only person doing it is an IP, I wish I could block him (hes' gotten like 5 warning without being blocked) but sadly I'm nowhere near becomming an admin, so we'l just have to hope that one of them pick up on it. If you think of anything else let me know. --Daniel()Folsom T|C|U 23:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
In remembance of a great man
In remembance of a great man, let's spend some of our free time serving the common good by working on a great resource of free learning, Wikipedia. Today, give more time than you normally would to helping do the work that needs to be done to keep this project on track. Drop by the project page Wikipedia:Martin Luther King Day of Service and do what you can. ike9898 04:01, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Coca-Cola peer review request
Hello Wompa99, you have indicated that you are a member of the Soft Drinks WikiProject. Can you please peer review Coca-Cola here. Thank you in advance.--Natl1 (Talk Page) (Contribs) 17:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
89.240.113.79 Vandalism
I suspect i have just acquired this ip as i would have noticed the message before, but please could you inform me what was done so i can check it wasnt anyone who had access to this pc. This is the | IP's user page Thanks Willow177 15:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
You've been approved to use VandalSniper. Please let me know if you have any problems getting it working. --Chris (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject on Vandalism studies Study 1 is complete.
The WikiProject on Vandalism studies recently finished its first study and has published its conclusions (a full and detailed copy of the conclusions can be found here).
The first study analyzed a randomly sampled pool of 100 random articles. Within these 100 articles there were a total of 668 edits during the months of November 2004, 2005, and 2006. Of those 668 edits, 31 (or 4.64%) were a vandalism of some type. The study's salient findings suggest that in a given month approximately 5% of edits are vandalism and 97% of that vandalism is done by anonymous editors. Obvious vandalism is the vast majority of vandalism used. From the data gathered within this study it is also found that roughly 25% of vandalism reverting is done by anonymous editors and roughly 75% is done by wikipedians with user accounts. The mean average time vandalism reverting is 758.35 minutes (12.63 hours), a figure that may be skewed by outliers. The median time vandalism reverting is 14 minutes.
Currently the project is working on a related study, Wikipedia:WikiProject Vandalism studies/Obama article study, and is also beginning to draft up the parameters of our second major study (see Study 2). If you are still interested in our work (your name is on the participant's list), please participate in our efforts to help create a solid understanding of vandalism and information on wikipedia by contributing to discussions of past studies or by helping plan up and coming ones. Thanks. JoeSmack Talk 04:54, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
WP:POKE is doing some housecleaning
This notice is to inform you that because many people have added their names to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants but do not seem to be active, all names are being deleted in an effort to find out who is still truly interested in the project. All you have to do is re-add your name if you'd still like to be considered a member of WP:POKE. Any questions, you can contact me on my talk page. -ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 17:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
Re: Thanks
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| You've have done a great job with vandal fighting, so I hearby award you this RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar. STORMTRACKER 94 22:40, 10 December 2007 (UTC) |
Apple Chill
Hey,
You're welcome, always trying to help the public (just so that I can be an administrator later lol) but just so you know you might wanna consider adding some categories to the article.
Have A Great Day/Night!! Warrior4321 03:46, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Hi Natasha Re Apple Chill. I marked it possible hoax, as the sentence 'Each year more than about one hundred thousand people' didn't seem right, like a hoax might be written, and the number seemed high to me. But I've since found Apple Chill at various other sites. The page http://www.northcarolinatravels.com/chapelhill/applechill/index.htm says 'once..almost 100,000'. So I retract the 'hoax' tag. It does look like some text was lifted straight from northcarolinatravels, though. All the best peterl (talk) 04:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Not sure if that is a bot gone wild or what, but I reverted the changes to Mixed logit per the Manual of Style, ie: in subtopics, not every word is capitalized. Pharmboy (talk) 23:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Biker Mice
I should have use sandbox to experiment but i dont know how plus i deleted season 2 because i had just finished putting all the information into boxes otherwise it was repeating the same infoDwanyewest (talk) 21:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:54, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
The list of participants of the Pokémon WikiProject is quite sizable, however, there is no way to determine which of whom are active contributors to that project. All participants in the list have been moved to Inactive. If you consider yourself to be an active member of the Pokémon WikiProject, please go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Pokémon#Participants and move your username to the Active section. Thank you. Useight (talk) 23:30, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Haggis Baggis
Hey there! Great job on your articles. I enjoy reading them very much. I just had a question on your article Haggis Baggis. Is it possible for me to help you improve that article (i.e. create an infobox, etc.) Thanks for bringing helpful information to Wikipedia. Your contributions are very welcomed. RSprings123 (talk) 16:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor
As a previous volunteer at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor I though you might like to know there is a new set available for work at Wikipedia:WikiProject Stubsensor/20100826. Hope to see you there. JeepdaySock (AKA, Jeepday) 10:47, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
 New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Wompa99! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:56, 26 October 2011 (UTC) |
WikiWomen's Collaborative
| WikiWomen Unite! | |
|---|---|
 |
Hi SoftHiss! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative. As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:
Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate! |
Speedy deletion nomination of Danny Kallis
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Danny Kallis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Blurred Lines 21:38, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Danny Kallis for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Danny Kallis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danny Kallis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Blurred Lines 23:29, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
| Thanks for spending time reverting vandalism! It takes a load off my back :-) - You should request rollback! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:47, 17 December 2015 (UTC) |
~Oshwah~ Thank you, I appreciate it!:)
You are awesome.
I respect your dedication in ensuring Wikipedia is free of vandalism. Thank you for your valiant efforts and please do continue in your plight. I salute thee, and wish thee valor and glory. 68.41.148.79 (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I appreciate it. Natasha (talk) 07:55, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
Hi SoftHiss,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, Wompa99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!
This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:
- Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
- Editor-focused central editing dashboard
- "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
- Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
- Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list
Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)
Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.
Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.
Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:11, 8 December 2016 (UTC)