User talk:Skull 'n' Femurs

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nothing to see here...

...I'm off-line doing secret stuff... ;)

ANTIENT CHARGES OF A UGLE FREE-MASON[edit]

File:Political enemies repeaters.svg
Brethrens’ Red Delta

Back, after the latest blocking…

(Concerning Wiki Users in general) VI.4. BEHAVIOUR IN PRESENCE OF STRANGERS, NOT MASONS You shall be cautious in your words and carriage, that the most penetrating stranger shall not be able to discover or find out what is not proper to be intimated; and sometimes you shall divert a discourse, and manage it prudently for the honour of the worshipful fraternity.

(Concerning Wiki Users who say they are Freemasons) VI.6. BEHAVIOUR TOWARDS A STRANGE BROTHER You are cautiously to examine him in such a method as prudence shall direct you, that you may not be imposed upon by an ignorant, false pretender, whom you are to reject with contempt and derision, and beware are of giving him any hints of knowledge.

  • Ref: BOOK OF CONSTITUTIONS UGLE, 2005 [1] in the public domain.

My actions have been quite consistent in upholding the “ Antient Charges”. I am not a “sock”. Several Mason users have been blocked, on the same IP address, and have been called “socks”. This is a lie – as they are different people. Doh! “S&F” is short for “Sincerely and Fraternally”, not Skull ‘n’ Femurs, at the end of a message. Any true Mason (or “knowledgeable” nosey ant-Mason) knows this. Skull 'n' Femurs 10:18, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked[edit]

The above (also put on Talk:Freemasonry is a statement of intent to systematically remove well-referenced information from Wikipedia, and is consistent with the user's actions and those of his sockpuppets in the past.

As such, I've blocked the user indefinitely (statement of intent to damage Wikipedia), unless and until he learns what's appropriate behaviour here.

This page has been locked to prevent removal of this notice - if you check the history of this talk page, the user has had many warnings about his actions, but always removes them as quickly as possible - David Gerard 12:40, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Skull 'n' Femurs! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 943 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Margaret Biggs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/BaSH PR0MPT for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. JDDJS (talk) 20:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Forget me knot flower.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Masonic Skull n Femurs.PNG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal file. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:23, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]