User talk:Simile

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Dear Friend Hitler. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bill william compton^Talk 01:25, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rita M. Johnson

The article Rita M. Johnson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Journalist who does not seem notable. No secondary sources about her.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Agtx (talk) 01:01, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Rita M. Johnson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rita M. Johnson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita M. Johnson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 23:44, 16 June 2015 (UTC)

Rita M. Johnson

The place to comment on the deletion proposal is the actual discussion page at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rita M. Johnson. Read WP:DISCUSSAFD and WP:Notability (people) first. Start your comment by typing *'''Keep''' (so that "Keep" is in bold - assuming that that is your recommendation) and then give your reasons.

Sign your comment (and any contributions you make on talk pages) by ending it with a group of four "tilde" characters ~~~~, which the system will convert to a "signature" of your username plus the time and date, like this: JohnCD (talk) 14:04, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simile, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

JMHamo (talk) 00:00, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

• I will report JMHamo for bullying. After questioning JMHamo's reasons for an AfD s/he immediately filed a Sockpuppet investigation against Simile. Which has been defended.Simile (talk) 04:14, 18 June 2015 (UTC)SIM

Speedy deletion nomination of Nicky Garratt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Nicky Garratt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JMHamo (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Simile. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simile.
Message added 18:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 18:00, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Simile. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Simile.
Message added 12:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vanjagenije (talk) 12:10, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Nicky Garratt for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nicky Garratt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicky Garratt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 15:36, 23 June 2015 (UTC)