User talk:Shuroo
I have added a paragraph on the general structure of the dynamic programming algorithm. I have also added the book by Dreyfus and Law which I consider as an excellent introduction to dynamic programming.
Your note[edit]
I agree that the efficiency is not affected, but the revision that I edited gave no instruction on how to pick the next node. Simply picking the node that is closest to the starting point will not necessarily get you the shortest path -- consider this 1-D topology: A-1-B-1-C-5-D. Where A-D are the nodes and the numbers between the nodes are the link costs. If C was the starting point and D was the destination, its clear that selecting the closest node to the starting point will lead you away from the destination rather than towards it. Did I misunderstand your comment? jheiv (talk) 00:06, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Gal's accurate tables[edit]
I've removed Gal's accurate tables from where you'd added them. It is just one technique for tables and is a couple of removed from the topic except for the trigonometrical tables article where it is already referenced. Just because the article referenced those articles doesn't mean they had some special relationship to it, it applies to making tables for any reasonably smooth function. Dmcq (talk) 17:20, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Your article has been moved to AfC space[edit]
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Shuroo/Halfin-whitt regime has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfin-whitt regime, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:17, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfin-whitt regime.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — The Earwig (talk) 01:35, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfin-whitt regime.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 06:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
I have replied to your answer at the help desk. Please do not add notes about your answer to other sections of the help desk as you did here; if you feel your answer is likely to be overlooked, starting a new section of your own is a better way (at a glance I took your note to mean that your answer to the Halfin-Whitt section was somehow relevant to the name change section). But in general we're pretty thorough in answering everything, even without a new section. Huon (talk) 11:37, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
Please note that the terms 'seminal work' and 'pioneering effort' appear in the introduction chapter of the very reliable secoundary source.Shuroo (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that; that's why I said you need to attribute them to the source and use footnotes, and suggested they be covered in a section on the result's impact. Right now our readers will not be able to tell who considers the work "seminal" and "pioneering". Huon (talk) 09:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Halfin-Whitt regime question[edit]
I've replied to your post on my talk page. Gareth Jones (talk) 10:23, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
- I've now added a brief comment about this to the M/M/c queue article. Gareth Jones (talk) 18:52, 7 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfin-whitt regime, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:41, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
Your article submission Halfin-whitt regime[edit]
Hello Shuroo. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Halfin-whitt regime.
The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Halfin-whitt regime}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 03:00, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 16[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Homicidal chauffeur problem, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rufus Isaacs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject. Thank you for this note. I have made a change into the right link. Shuroo (talk) 09:21, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Shuroo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Shuroo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)