User talk:Seeking absolute truth

This is Seeking absolute truth's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandip Sinharay (March 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Umakant Bhalerao was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandip Sinharay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seeking absolute truth! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 04:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sandip Sinharay (March 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by User4edits was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see the above comments (NPROF).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sandip Sinharay and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, One of the eight academic-specific criteria is "8. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area." In my article, I provided links to prove that this person, Sandip Sinharay, is the current chief editor of Psychometrika that is a well-established journal in this person's field. If you have any doubts, please search the journal holdings at a university of your choice and you will find the journal that has a decent impact factor. Please also do another search to verify that Sandip Sinharay is indeed the editor of the journal. I also provided links to prove that he was editor of two other journals in his field---Journal of Educational Measurement and Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. Again, please feel free to do your own search about the importance of these journals and to verify that he was indeed an editor of these journals. Criterion number 1 is "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." and I provided the Google scholar link to prove that the person's h-index is 38 and i10 index is 113. Again, if you know an academic, please ask that person what these numbers mean and you will find out that these numbers mean that Sandip Sinharay had a significant impact in his scholarly discipline. Criterion number 2 is that "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." and I provided links to prove that Sandip Sinharay received multiple awards from a well-recognized organization (National Council on Measurement in Education) in his field. Criterion number 6 is that the person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society and Sandip Sinharay is a Distinguished Presidential Appointee at Educational Testing Service that is known all over the world. Thus, I request you to reconsider your decision after doing a little more homework on your part. While you want to be rigorous in your selection criteria, you surely want to include people who deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Regards, Seeking.... Seeking absolute truth (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I would like to explain why the article on Sandip Sinharay, which I submitted, is worth being included in Wikipedia. Your message indicates that the article should meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria. If you look carefully, the article meets three or four of the eight academic-specific criteria. So I request you to reconsider your decision of rejecting the article.

One of the eight academic-specific criteria is "8. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area." In my article, I provided links to prove that this person, Sandip Sinharay, is the current chief editor of Psychometrika that is a well-established journal in this person's field. If you have any doubts, please search the journal holdings at a university of your choice and you will find the journal that has a decent impact factor. Please also do another search to verify that Sandip Sinharay is indeed the editor of the journal. I also provided links to prove that he was editor of two other journals in his field---Journal of Educational Measurement and Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. Again, please feel free to do your own search about the importance of these journals and to verify that he was indeed an editor of these journals. Criterion number 1 is "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." and I provided the Google scholar link to prove that the person's h-index is 38 and i10 index is 113. Again, if you know an academic, please ask that person what these numbers mean and you will find out that these numbers mean that Sandip Sinharay had a significant impact in his scholarly discipline. Criterion number 2 is that "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." and I provided links to prove that Sandip Sinharay received multiple awards from a well-recognized organization (National Council on Measurement in Education) in his field. Criterion number 6 is that the person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society and Sandip Sinharay is a Distinguished Presidential Appointee at Educational Testing Service that is known all over the world. Thus, I request you to reconsider your decision after doing a little more homework on your part. While you want to be rigorous in your selection criteria, you surely want to include people who deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Regards, Seeking.... Seeking absolute truth (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC) Seeking absolute truth (talk) 16:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Responded at the appropriate venue. at Request on 03:36:38, 29 March 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Seeking absolute truth . Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Seeking absolute truth. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Sandip Sinharay, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Hal S. Stern[edit]

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Hal S. Stern has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.ics.uci.edu/%7Esternh. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. — Diannaa (talk) 23:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024[edit]

Hello, I'm User4edits. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:User4edits that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 04:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Braun (Statistician) (April 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Braun (Statistician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jamiebuba (talk) 10:19, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sandip Sinharay[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Sandip Sinharay, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry Braun (statistician) (April 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GSS was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry Braun (statistician) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GSS ^💬 06:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question for administrator[edit]

This request for help from administrators has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the {{admin help}} template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

I created a draft page for Sandip Sinharay for review. The editor User4edits recommended it for speedy deletion because he thought that page was promotional. User4edits gave me the option to contest the speedy deletion and rewriting it in proper Wikipedia style. But before I could contest or rewrite, the draft got deleted (within 12 or so hours since User4edits recommended a speedy deletion). Is it possible to restore the article so that I can rewrite? Also, I find these editors to be so over-aggressive---they are strongly opinionated and do not allow any scope of a civil discussion! Thanks, --Seeking absolute truth (talk) 17:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

When an article or page is marked for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay or discussion if an administrator feels that the given criteria applies. Post-deletion you may challenge it at Deletion Review. 331dot (talk) 22:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]