User talk:Scotthoughauthor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

September 2014[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did to Kirkland Lake, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kirkland Lake. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Your personal site is not a reliable source. Further, please check our conflict of interest policy. Dusti*Let's talk!* 02:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. I am attempting to add the name of a legitimately notable Kirkland Lake resident: Nadine Antoniazzi. It is not my intent to self-promote.

Hi Scott. I see you're trying to add an individual to the "Notable People" section. Please read our policy on notability and realize that, just because she may have been related to someone, she's not eligible for inclusion. Dusti*Let's talk!* 14:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Kirkland Lake. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:09, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Scotthoughauthor reported by User:Dusti (Result: ). Thank you. Dusti*Let's talk!* 15:11, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Scotthoughauthor, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi Scotthoughauthor! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Scotthoughauthor! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Dusti*Let's talk!* 16:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages![edit]

Hello, Scotthoughauthor. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arthur goes shopping (talk) 22:29, 8 September 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Information icon Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

In response to the note posted at ANI, I have removed and deleted portions of this talkpage that were blatant violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Wikipedia does not countenance the posting of accusations of criminal activity against living individuals unless prosecution has been initiated. Wikipedia is not a place to conduct investigations, reveal previously unknown truths, or to right great wrongs. If you abuse Wikipedia in this manner again, you may expect to have your editing privileges revoked. Acroterion (talk) 01:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What Acroterion says. I've gone through and deleted more, including the name, which I have removed from edit summaries since one thing can lead to another. Drmies (talk) 00:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]