User talk:SapphiresBlue

February 2018[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Quinn Norton has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Quinn Norton was changed by SapphiresBlue (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914498 on 2018-02-23T23:46:33+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Quinn Norton. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. PabloMartinez (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dr Quinn hatnote?[edit]

I'll explain my concerns with the Weev content on the article talk page, but this is a separate concern. There's no reason to have a hatnote to Dr. Quinn, Medicine Woman on Quinn Norton. The character's name on the show is "Dr. Michaela "Mike" Quinn" and nobody will ever confuse the two. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:46, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I was being sarcastic. Someone put a disambiguation on her page, with some sportstar named Quinn Nordin, or Nordvin, and I was annoyed. :) That's not even proper nomenclature, i.e. disambiguation belongs on disambiguation pages. And probably, no one confuses Norton with Nordvin. Sapphiresblue (talk) 18:47, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important standard notice regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Neutrality^talk 19:01, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Important standard notice regarding all edits concerning living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Neutrality^talk 19:02, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources[edit]

Please take a moment to read Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Sources like "Zero Hedge" (which you cited here) are not acceptable sources for use on Wikipedia, especially for sensitive material concerning living persons. Thanks. Neutrality^talk 19:04, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-puppet[edit]

Of Norton. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.54.203.27 (talk) 08:08, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]