User talk:Sannse/Archive 7

You are most Welcome! -- sannse (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

m:OTRS

I may have the wrong page, but this message is to confirm that the picture that was posted for Jimmy Boyd "I Saw Mommy Kissing Sant Claus" Inherit The Wind" was a photo of Jim Boyd "Electric Company. Jimmy Boyd has strawberry blonde hair. You were indeed right to remove it.

Just telling you I've emailed you. Thanks. Computerjoe's talk 20:22, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

I seem to have missed this one, I'm really sorry. I will look at it as soon as possible and get back to you. Aapologies again -- sannse (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Incest

Am I allowed to say I like incest anywhere on my userpage? Jamie 09:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

I wouldn't recommend it. Wikipedia isn't the place for this, try MySpace. -- sannse (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

ok sorry. Jamie 09:32, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

User:AmiDaniel

I've been told I need to drop you a note confirming that I am AmiDaniel on IRC as well. And, well, I am =D. AmiDaniel (talk) 09:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, and done -- sannse (talk) 09:22, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Hey

Could you unblock the ....[expletive].... ranges on wikia? Donal JW 11:16, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi, as far as I know, there are no Wikia-wide range blocks at the moment. Although there are some on specific wikis where we've had problems. Please could you email community@wikia.com - giving specific information about where you are blocked from, what IP you are using, your user name (if you have one), and the specific message that you get when you try to edit. Thanks -- sannse (talk) 11:39, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

I'll add to this. I see that you vadalised Wikipedia with another account shortly after leaving this message, and I know that the IP that you used with both accounts matches that used on Wikia for repeated vandalism. With that in mind, I think it unlikely that we will remove any range blocks affecting you on Wikia in the near future. -- sannse (talk) 11:54, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Spaces.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Spaces.jpg. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Yes, yes... I know... stupid bot - READ MY MIND WILL YOU?! 'Twas just a temp upload -- sannse (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

You read my mind

Hi Sannse, thanks for your suggestion. Yes, in fact I do edit Uncyclopedia on occasion, under the same username as I use here. Yes definately a tension reliever! Herostratus 14:21, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Neostinker

Hi, im sorry to just pop up like this, i was trying to change a picture in the affenpinscher article , i feel the picture i have portrays a better view of the face, however i inserted the image and i found that the code didnt work, the images is successfully on wikipedia. After the code did not work i could not undo the changes and now the picture is missing from this article. Please could you help me with this?

I've fixed the image. I disagree that yours is a better image for the article. It may show the face full-on, but it doesn't show the whole dog. It's also very dark. But there is room in the article for more than one image, I would suggest leaving the full dog image in the infobox and adding your image outside the box. And you can always expand the article to give a better balance of course ;)

By the way, it's usual here to add new messages to the bottom of the page, and you can sign by typing four tildes after your message (~~~~). -- sannse (talk) 07:09, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your help on the affenpinscher article, i will add the image outside of the info box, im still quite new to this so im a little bit :-S. Thanks again (Neostinker 10:13, 22 June 2006 (UTC))

Yes, it's me on IRC

Topic says it all. SushiGeek 22:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Doing the job

This will, I declare, do the job joshbuddy, talk 22:24, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Jbolden1517

Unfortunately went and did something rather rash: he decided to threaten Cowman. I've had to remove him from the mediation cabal. This is rather unfortunate, as he seemed rather promising. In any case thank you for wanting to invest your time. Kim Bruning 17:45, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Source help

Hi , sorry to bother you .... again, you are the only administrator i know i have spoken to , i have uploaded an image , given its copyright status but i dont know how to add a source, i forgot to do it when i uploaded the image and now i can't figure out how to do it , i know when the source is given it will tell me wether the website is suitable but i would be grateful for your help. (Neostinker 15:18, 1 July 2006 (UTC))

All you need to do is add the link to the site where you got the image from to the image page. Just click edit at the top of the image information page here and type the url of the site there. That will show the source nicely. -- sannse (talk) 18:30, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, sannse, i dont know what id have done without you !!! (Neostinker 20:00, 1 July 2006 (UTC))

Apologies

Created by logged-out user, "Sannse" misspelled... had all the earmarks of an impersonator. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 07:34, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

Of course :) no problem at all, and thanks for looking out for problems like this! -- sannse (talk) 07:47, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome, and thank you! :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 07:58, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

We need your help...

Hello Sannse! We need some admin help again on the Preterist page which is getting repeatedly vandalized by someone with a wierd "grudge" link they keep posting. All of the contibutors to this article, partial preterist and full preterist (who in most other things are at war with each other!), are in agreement this is vandalism, and the anon editor is not participating in the talk page. Can you assist or let an Admin know that can assist?

Dee Dee Warren 20:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The vandal went wild again last night.

Dee Dee Warren 10:12, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

RE: Johnny Lee Clary - Please help

Hey there, my name is Nick, my username is Potters house and I have encountered a problem with trying to provide any information about Johnny Lee Clary. I have posted this post off to other staff members also. I am not sure if this is the best route to resolve this, but can think of no other way.

The article Johnny Lee Clary has been deleted. I have known Johnny through telephone conversations and email for a short time now (about 3-4 months). He recently came and shared his life story in for our church group for the first time just two weeks ago. Before I met Johnny I became interested in his story i.e. his conversion from the head of the KKK in the US, to being a Christian Minister who now teaches against race hate groups. I found the article Johnny Lee Clary as it still is today, deleted, except for some small talk. If you read the talk you see what I have said at the time (notice I have gotten no reply, probable my fault as I don’t know heaps about WIKI policy). From my understanding Johnny Lee Clary was posting as The KingOfDixie and looks like he tried to change a few things on Wiki concerning the KKK. While this is a controversial subject, Johnny being the former leader of the KKK would probably know a thing or two and be able to contibute, but that’s another story. He eventually made an article about himself i.e. Johnny Lee Clary. Johnny being quite new to Wiki and ignorant of rules of conduct found himself at odds with some admins and had his site deleted.

Whilst observing Johnny over the last 3-4 months I have noticed that he is very outspoken against race hate groups such as the Neo Nazis, Skinheads, KKK etc. This, more often than not, lands Johnny in the hot seat. He has experienced persecution from racist groups for his departure from the KKK and voiced opinions against these racist organizations on his webpage, www.xkkk.org. Johnny has also received multiple death threats.

Because of his bold stance against these racist groups Johnny has become accustomed to hatred directed at him by those same groups. Johnny concluded that perhaps the guy who deleted the page Johnny Lee Clary was a white supremist. I am hoping to clear this up. Before he told me this, I started to create J L Clary, after hearing nothing from posting in user talk on Johnny Lee Clary's article. I wasn't 10 minutes into the J L Clary article when it was issued a deletion notice, and then before I had time to reply (about 5 minutes) it was deleted! I was amazed. I told this to Johnny and he said the main reason he was told that he couldn't have an article was because he was not prominent enough.

Johnny has a very famous testimony and has been on multiple TV shows like Oprah, Donahue, Jerry Springer, etc, and even recently when he preached in our town he made front page news, a double spread on his life, and the local ABC interviewed him live, which is not bad for our town (LISMORE NSW Australia) See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history .

When David Wilkerson came to our town hardly anyone knew or cared, yet David Wilkerson is allowed an article (and rightfully so), but more people know of Johnny. As to whether he is famous or not, just Google search him and see all the TV interviews and radio interviews he does. He hangs with some of the most prominent Christian leaders in Australia. Besides this, just being the former KKK leader should be enough for an article (he doesn't even get a mention in the KKK one, and would be deleted). He was also a Pro Wrestler. So he is prominent in Christian circles, he is prominent amongst race hate groups, and he is also prominent in the WWE wrestling.

Johnny asked me to test the waters for him to see if he was being persecuted by someone from a race hate group. So I created some sites, John Clary Wade Watts and Operation Colorblind - the name of Johnny's Ministry. These have been fine until yesterday. I cannot understand why these sites are just issued a deletion notice? Just because they mention JLC? I was hoping to discuss these things but they are just deleted. The one on Wade Watts is about a black gospel preacher who was one of the leaders in the civil rights movement in the US and was good friends with Martin Luther King. He took Johnny Clary under his wing and even ordained Johnny as a minister (to this day Johnny is the only white man ordained in the All Black Baptist Church). But his article is up for deletion because I mentioned Clary and had a link.

That is why I am writing to you to see if you can help. It seems to me that the person(s) deleting all articles which even mention Johnny Lee Clary has an agenda. I thought that wikipedia admins had to keep a neutral stance on every article. It seems like this guy has a vendetta against JLC. Why delete the Wade Watts article. That is guilt by association and could be proof that all deletions are because of racial discrimination! I hope this is not the case and would think that it is politically motivated, as Johnny is a strong supporter of George Bush and Antaeus Feldspar of Kerry.

See:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history This shows how Antaeus Feldspar supports Kerry, which is fine, but Johnny is a strong supporter of Bush.

My hope is that Johnny will be able to have an article like any other famous person, minister, former KKK leader, or pro wrestler, and that Johnny and anyone connected with him and his ministry will in future have certain rules set in place that do not allow the wholesale deletion of the articles associated with him, but that they will be at least discussed.

I thank you for reading this long winded post. I have only been using WIKI for about a year myself so I need your help, I don't really know what else to do. I hope you can help. I personally think that Johnny's story is one that is beneficial to the cause of reconciliation between races and to the3 unity of society as a whole. It would be a shame if WIKI became known for having covert racists. Of course I hope that this is a misunderstanding and that all will be cleared up soon.

Here are some links that might help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wade_Watts

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TheKingOfDixie

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Colorblind

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Threeafterthree

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Potters_house

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Antaeus_Feldspar

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Kerry&dir=prev&offset=20050327125109&limit=500&action=history This shows how Antaeus Feldspar supports Kerry, which is fine, but Johnny is a strong supporter of Bush. Perhaps the bias is political and not racial?

The link for page: John Clary has already been deleted!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alabamaboy

Please notice that his link was taken from the KKK site the same day:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=prev&oldid=65690238

then

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ku_Klux_Klan&diff=next&oldid=65690238

Also note his contributions: Featured articles: · African American literature -- My first featured article. Thanks to everyone who gave feedback. While I didn't start the article, I obsessed on it for an entire month and wrote most of the copy. · Ku Klux Klan -- I began work on this article after it became a featured article. Since then I've mediated several editorial disputes on the article (including one of which kept the article from being delisted as a FA) and made a large number of edit. Potters house 00:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC) Nick.

Sockpuppet

ok im senior porcupine but i didn't know sockpupets are banned their and why ban me, i just though it was vandal sockpupets please i beg you sansee ill do anything please i love that wiki please please unbann me i beg you. - DV

Vandalism

Good Morning Sannse. Im sorry i keep coming to you for advise but youve been really helpful so far! An article i created has been vandalised and i don't know what to do. This morning when i was updating the Despina Pavlou article i noticed that someone had added a paragraph. I was unsure whether i have to report it and if so how?, i don't know who is responsible, or if this even definately counts as vandalism ?? I would be grateful if you could take a look. Sorry !! (Neostinker 09:08, 15 August 2006 (UTC))

You did the right thing in removing it. That sort of text can be taken out on sight. Good work -- sannse (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Sannse , your a great help ! (Neostinker 11:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC))

Michael Graham

Hello, Sannse....If you could, would you please revisit the Michael Graham page to resolve an impasse....I have made minor changes to the reference to the "Islam" controversy section, and I am having challenges trying to get user badlydrawnjeff to work towards a compromise. Please review the comments in the discussion section under "August 2006 editing", with specific reference to the Washington Post article and the reasons for Graham's dismissal from WMAL. Jeff believes that it is an accurate representation to say that Graham was fired due to hosting the discussion of Islam and terrorism. I believe that it would be more accurate to say that Graham's comments caused the controversy, not the discusion topic. I refer you to Michael Graham's own words in an August 9, 2006, article on the firing, (http://www.charlestoncitypaper.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A16052) In the article, Graham stated, "One year ago this week, I was fired from my talk radio job by ABC/Disney for saying on the air — and in the pages of this newspaper — that "Islam is a terrorist organization." ....That's what I said. ABC ordered me to apologize for it. They insisted I perform community service as a form of penance for it. I told them I would never apologize for telling the truth, and they fired me."

I offered a compromise wording to jeff, but he refuses to budge or contribute to the compromise. I would appreciate it if you could help settle this dispute. 68.50.149.214 00:25, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

A quick hello

Hi Sannse. Been a while. Just a quick hello and best wishes as ever. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc 18:04, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi Bob, I've been away. Hello back :) -- sannse (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Excellent, Sannse ! Bests. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc 13:15, 3 September 2006 (UTC) (User talk:Wikiklrsc}

Back

I've been away from wikipedia for a while, but now am trying to get going again! I've left all the messages above from when I was away, I expect them to be totally out of date now. If there is anything you want me to look at now, please leave me another note. Thanks! -- sannse (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Wondering if you could...

Use your oversight powers to delete my user page history? There is sensitive personal information on there that I would like removed. Everything up to the most recent edit? Magic Window 14:53, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

I see this has already been done. -- sannse (talk) 11:00, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Sid McMath

You uploaded Image:Sid 2.jpg. The license for this image needs some attention. Could you take a look at this and see which tag it needs? --Gadget850 ( Ed) 13:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi Gadget850, done. -- sannse (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! We are using the image on List of Eagle Scouts and are looking to push for a featured list. --Gadget850 ( Ed) 18:23, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

IRC

Hi. Just to confirm that I am who I say I am on IRC. Cheers, Redux 16:43, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Don't want speedy deletion of Thomas Temple article!

Hi Sannse. Can you help on this ? User_talk:Mapetite526#Speedy_Deletion_of_Thomas_Temple_article_.3F. I only wrote/began to write this article because much of what I had otherwise been writing was referencing Sir Thomas Temple! And so many established articles pointed to an empty Thomas Temple article, so I decided to start writing it. Thanks. --- (Bob) Wikiklrsc 22:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC) (User talk:Wikiklrsc)

The Classic Marvel Figurine Collection

Hi Sannse, just a quick question really, about a year ago i created this article, a few months ago someone added the newer issues of the magazine which is fair enoug. Shortly after i noticed that more issues were being added that i had not seen confirmed on the official magazine site, another edit has also been made more recently on the page about estimated future special issues which are also not confirmed on the site. I have contacted the company in the past asking about future issues and they have always infromed me they do not get a set list until the figurines have been made, therefore i should only trust information on the official site. Is it ok for me to remove all the unverified information or do i have to tag the article first? History of my conversations with the editors is on the talk page for the article. There is also a link to the official site. Thanks. (Neostinker 16:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC))

Glad to here you have fought and won the battle of depression! I have been there myself. It is a very misunderstood, condition, since most people just respond by saying "snap out of it!" not relizing that if it was that easy we would have done that already! Diana Nelson cubiegrl@surewest.net

World Dog Show

commons:Talk:List of dog breeds :) 83.30.240.138 18:56, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

admin channel

Hi Sannse. Can you tell me how I can access the admin channel (#wikipedia-en-admins). I don't know much about IRC. I am an admin and I'm almost sure I'm on whatever permission list is required, and I can connect to #wikipedia-en OK, but #wikipedia-en-admins requires an invite. inviting myself ("/msg irc invite herostratus #wikipedia-en-admins") doesn't seem to do anything. Thanks, Herostratus 16:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

New Photo Matching Service

Hi there,

I'm contacting you because you listed yourself at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. You might be interested in a new wikiproject page that lists photographers and articles that need photos by location. The page is located at Wikipedia:Photo Matching Service or WP:PMS GabrielF 00:41, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

help requested

Can you give me some advice on how to access #wikipedia-en-admins. When go there, it says "you have to be invited", so then I invite myself by entering "/msg chanserv invite #wikipedia-en-admins", but then it tells me I have to have level 5 authorization to do that. Am I doing something wrong or what? Herostratus 06:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

A WikiCookie for you!

You're always sickeningly helpful. For all the times you've been so nice, I've decided to give you one of my original WikiCookies (and yes, I was the first person to use this image as a casual award - other people have just copied me). - Mark 09:40, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Cross-Wiki Love =

Because You're Worth It™. --Codeine 01:15, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

OTRS sk

Hallo. I am an admin on sk:Wikipedia, sk:Wikibooks and sk:Wikisource. We would like to start the OTRS queues info-sk and permissions-sk, I hope you could assist us with this? Thank you! --AtonX 14:04, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

The Photographer's Barnstar

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For the admirable work in adding useful photos to Wikipedia, which are now making it to Wikimedia Commons, so more projects can benefit from your hard work. I especially award this for capturing the many plant species. Some of your photos have now been categorised into commons:Category:Essex wildlife. Without your photos it would be very empty! Thank you. Ksbrowntalk 20:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

You really deserve it! Your picture of a gossamer-winged butterfly ([1]) took my breath away. Esn 04:31, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

sk OTRS queue

Hallo. Your name is listed among the contact persons at meta:OTRS as a contact person. We would like to start the queues info-sk and permissions-sk for the Slovak Wikimedia projects. I have been trying to get in touch with one of the contact person for a while, but I have not received a response. Could you please help? Thank you! (w:sk:User:AtonX / w:sk:User talk:AtonX). --AtonX 09:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Paperdolls

Hi, Some time ago I re-purposed your COTM image from wikia (which in turn came from [2]) to here to serve as a non-identifying identifier for a long term vandal on WP. Since then all the long term vandal pages have gone, but I have had a note stating that the image is possibly unfree. Thought I'd let you know and also see if you have any info. Rich Farmbrough, 10:42 10 March 2007 (GMT).

Quick check-in and hello

Hello, Sannse dear! I was crestfallen to see that both you and Elf are not active on the dog breed list project these days. Not that I can talk! I just did a quick check-in last night to review the Siberian Husky, Alaskan Husky, and Seppala Siberian Sleddog articles. Got hooked and wound up doing a general edit of the AH article and making some changes on the other two, including a decent intro for the SH article which has somehow acquired a very poor one. Unfortunately I'm out again as suddenly as I reappeared; I won't be around here again for some months probably. We are moving Seppala Kennels out of the Yukon, going to central Manitoba where our feeding supplies will be cheaper and more plentiful and our contact with SSSD Project supporters much better and more centralised. We got tired of paying the "northern premium" of exorbitant transport rates, ruinous vet fees, and of living in such a primitive situation. We're acquiring a 240-acre farm in the lovely "Parkland" region of Manitoba and joining forces with two Chinook breeders whom we've known and admired for several years. A huge new adventure -- but moving a BIG kennel over 3000 miles is a daunting prospect. It'll take place this summer sometime. Hopefully I might get back to Wikipedia in the autumn. But I couldn't go without saying a warm hello to you.

Woops! Almost forgot to tell you about MY new wiki! Hosted at "Peanut Butter Wiki": SeppalaWiki. It is why Wikipedia has seen so little of me for the last year. It's slow work (because it's taking awhile for Project supporters to see the long-term value of it) and it's discouraging to create so many stubs knowing that probably nobody else will expand them, at least for awhile. Still and all, great oaks from little acorns grow and I suspect that a couple years or more down the line others will discover the usefulness of an online wiki knowledge base for a struggling small-population breed like ours

I hope you aren't having too much trouble with depression these days -- I had to battle it a bit off and on this winter. (You might have a look at the Byron Katie website www.thework.com; she has an excellent self-enquiry methodology that can be very helpful; someone pointed it out to me and I found it useful.) All of my best wishes to you! Ditkoofseppala 19:41, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

POTD notification

POTD

Hi Sannse,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture Image:Ring tailed lemur and twins.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on May 26, 2007. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2007-05-26. howcheng {chat} 18:43, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

As a result of the delist nomination, your photo is being pulled from its scheduled POTD appearance. If it remains a Featured Picture, it will be put back in the queue. Regards, howcheng {chat} 16:17, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

Image nominated for delisting

Hi Sannse. I'm sorry to inform you that I've nominated the above image for delisting from Featured Picture status, as I don't believe it meets the current criteria. You're welcome to comment at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Ring-tailed Lemurs. Please don't take this personally, it's just that the criteria have been considerably revised since 2005 to reflect the much greater number of high-quality images that are now available. Even if the image is delisted, it will still serve a useful purpose in the articles it illustrates. Best wishes, --YFB ¿ 15:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

eternalwars wikia

No problem, I didn't take it as a personal offense or a reflection on the community. I just had better things to do than hang out in a channel where the only people paying attention were rude. I realize that it isn't truly that big a deal and don't really expect anything to happen regarding this particular wikia, but I wanted to alert folks in the community to it since the concept behind it (WP:BEANS) could potentially become more of an issue later on. Just a heads up about a potential issue we can relatively easily monitor should the need arise. Thanks for the warm response. :-) —WAvegetarian (talk) 11:53, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Wikimedia UK

Hi Sannse,

At some point you expressed an interest in supporting Wikimedia UK. We're now ready to begin receiving applications from prospective members. If you would like to join, application forms and further information can be found at: http://www.wikimedia.org.uk/join. Feel free to ask me if you have any questions, either via my user page at the English Wikipedia or by email (andrew.walker@wikimedia.org.uk).

Thanks, Andreww 19:03, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

(Membership officer, Wikimedia UK)

Latin West

Hello Sannse, I was just reading the latin page, and I think your Idea for a Latin West page is a great idea, and would be a good contribuation to wikipedia. I dont know if you were planning on writing it, but if you are I have alot of information, and have studied that, along with similar topics for some years, and would be glad to help. Let me know. --Lucius Sempronius Turpio 14:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

vandalism

I'm asking you to do this since I have interacted with you before, in the chat room, so I know you can help me. There is a user (well, he/she goes by his/her IP address), 74.79.212.181, that has edited the Martin Luther King, Jr. page multiple times (it was corrected once or twice), to say that he had a speech called "I Have a Scheme", as opposed to "I Have a Dream". I believe that this act of utter disrespect should result in the IP address losing its editing priviledges. If you think I am wrong, just tell me on my talk page. If not, you don't need to send me any messages- I'll know you agreed. Thanks for any help you can give me- Kanogul ^(talk) 01:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

You took a picture of my dog!

You took a picture of my bergamasco at Birmingham champ show 2003 and i want to replace the picture to one of him now that his coat is fully grown. How can i do this? Can you please help —Preceding unsigned comment added by EmmaB12345 (talk • contribs) 14:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Montypythonsings.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Montypythonsings.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Save_Us_229 16:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

"Vandalism"

It was an experiment to see how long an innocuous inaccuracy would last on a random Wikipedia page. Hardly any sort of aggressive or insidious vandalism. If anybody had actually visited the page they would have seen it as an obvious joke and reverted it (which did indeed happen, albeit only after I posted the link, and it took downwards of 10 seconds). I do apologize for it, but I think threating a ban was a bit much. You have to judge a case by its merits. --Savethemooses (talk) 10:21, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Also, I feel bad. I should be asleep by now. --Savethemooses (talk) 10:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Old_Man_of_the_Mountain_overlay_2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Old_Man_of_the_Mountain_overlay_2.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Dream out loud (talk) 03:05, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry I'm no longer active on Wikipedia. If I recall, this image was related to a copyright issue I dealt with when I was responsible for email to the Wikimedia Foundation. I don't have access to OTRS any more (or if I do, I don't have the inclination to wade thorough it any more), so if you want to follow up on this you will need to talk to someone who does. They will be able to confirm my recollection that PD permission was given by the image author. From what I remember, that was on the page at the time, but it looks like that template has been changed. Regards -- sannse (talk) 17:53, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Order of Whiteoak

Hi there, I've restored the {{references}} tag here because I don't believe the external links cited are sufficiently reliable sources. It's not that the article is entirely unsupported, nor do I have any doubt that the group exists. It's just that for me the sources aren't really independent enough to clearly establish notability. As it stands, this could easily be a group of a couple of dozen people who have among them someone who can write press releases and has contacts with one or two other Druidic organisations who will republish them. If they are more than this, I'm sure some more reliable sources will turn up. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 11:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Talk:Doberman Pinscher

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Talk:Doberman Pinscher, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at [[Talk:Talk:Doberman Pinscher|its talk page]]. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Sysop

Thank you very much for making me a Sysop in india.wikia.

--Dore chakravarty (talk) 20:21, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in ...

I saw your name at Wikipedia:Wikipedians/Photographers. I revised the pages at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Please consider adding your name to the top of the page at Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in London? and to any of the other subpages for Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in England. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 01:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

New School (Dawson)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article New School (Dawson), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jerzy•t 07:50, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

NowCommons: Image:Juvenile Gull 800.jpg

Image:Juvenile Gull 800.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Juvenile Herring Gull.jpg and Image:Bideford long bridge pan 1200.jpg as Commons:Image:Bideford long bridge pan 1200.jpg. Commons is a repository of free media that can be used on all MediaWiki wiki's. The image(s) will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Juvenile Herring Gull.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 11:05, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Defense (military)

I have nominated Defense (military), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Defense (military). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 08:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC) --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 08:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Your seashell image

Hi Sannse, I like your seashell image.

and I want to use it to illustrate the article Seashell. Can I ask you, is that an image of your own shell collection? If so, did you collect the shells yourself in and around Clacton? Are there any shells in the picture from other countries, or from other parts of Britain? (By the way, I can tell from the whelks that the image at some point has been "flopped", left to right, I don't know how that happened... but it can easily be fixed.) if you can, would you answer on my page? Thanks. Very best to you, Invertzoo (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I got someone to "flip" the image back to the proper way so that part should be fine now. Hoping to hear from you whenever you get a chance about where the shells are from. Very best to you, Invertzoo (talk) 22:21, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply Sannse. It really is an excellent picture, it's very beautiful in terms of what shells you found and how you put them together for the image. You are a good shell-collector, it's a lot of different species! Do you by any chance have a higher resolution version you could upload? Thanks, and all good wishes, Invertzoo (talk) 00:27, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi again Sannse, Best wishes for the New Year. I very much value that image of yours. I find it very useful as an encyclopedia image, and I am a semi-professional in the field of malacology. Your image is already one of the lead images in the English Wikipedia article Seashell, which about 400 people a day look at. This image is particularly helpful as an illustration for the seashell article because all of the shells come from one locality, and therefore it illustrates the mollusc fauna of that one area. (It is not easy to find images of a good variety of shells all from one locality, especially in such an attractive composition.) I can easily identify most if not all of the shells, list them in the caption and give links to articles about the individual species. I personally think it makes a great illustration. Therefore I would ask you very sincerely if you still have a higher resolution image to consider giving it. But if you do not want to release it at higher resolution in case it is used for commercial purposes or whatever, I do understand. It certainly is a great image. Very best wishes to you, Invertzoo (talk) 15:42, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Happy Sannse/Archive 7's Day!

User:Sannse/Archive 7 has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Sannse/Archive 7's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Sannse/Archive 7! Peace, Rlevse ~ A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 00:21, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

NowCommons: File:Lakeland Terrier 600.jpg

File:Lakeland Terrier 600.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:Lakeland Terrier.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:Lakeland Terrier.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 19:31, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Yellow-rattle close 700.jpg

Is up for delisting. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Pieris brassicae caterpillar.jpg

One of your images is up for delisting. Noodle snacks (talk) 13:23, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Your (?) images on commons

On Commons I found two images, where other user added the information, that they are from you and that it is OK to use them. If that is true, it will be nice to add a text on commons, that it is OK by your own edit. The images are

• 
• 

91.13.68.202 (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Harassment has followed me from Liberapedia

Thanks for blocking some open proxies at Liberapedia, see your talk page at Wikia. The vandals have followed me here where I’m Proxima Centauri 2 (talk), see User talk:Proxima Centauri 2. The vandal has accused me of the type of obscenity that he (I very much doubt if that’s a woman) does and that I don’t do. It is quite likely he’s trying to get me blocked at Wikipedia for something I haven’t done. If a user made false accusations like that against another user on any wiki where I am an administrator I would block that user for harassment and intimidation. Are you an administrator here? Proxima Centauri 2 (talk) 13:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

As an established editor of the article Mole (animal), your input is solicited on the Talk page to help resolve an ongoing dispute as to the nature and scope of the article. Chrisrus (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

As an established editor of the article Mole (animal), your input is solicited on the Talk page to help resolve an ongoing dispute as to the nature and scope of the article. Chrisrus (talk) 16:55, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

G'day Sannse

I thought I'd drop you a note because I just linked to a comment of yours about the wikia ad problem thing here - it's also on the admin.s noticeboard at the mo here - thought you might like to know, and / or comment :-) cheers, Privatemusings (talk) 01:40, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi Sannse

Just felt like saying Hi :P --Lcawte (talk) 19:11, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

nice picture

hi- i'm speaking of the picture "Blackbird and Kestrel"- found it in the german wikipedia in an article about blackbirds. very impressing photo. many thanx for giving it to the community. greetz from germany! Joachim Schweers --79.197.24.162 (talk) 13:38, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Ping

I have sent you an e-mail. --Tenmei (talk) 07:55, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your time and consideration. As a gesture of appreciation, may I share a rhetorical question from the Analects of Confucius: "Is it not pleasant to learn with a constant perseverance and application?" --Tenmei (talk) 00:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Wikia problem

Are you Lisa Carter from Wiki A? Well, I have a Wikia.com account, Star651, that got globally banned by you. You said I was not 13 yet, which is not the truth. I was born 1-10-1997. Why did you ban me? I can't administer my beloved wiki website now. (I do not have a Wikipedia account, so this post is unsigned) 68.42.246.27 (talk) 02:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

ping

You may be interested in this thread, where I refer to our dialogue last month. See RFAR and Risker's meta:talk, too. Cheers, Jack Merridew 21:56, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Depression (mood)

Hi. I notice you were involved in structuring the Wikipedia disambiguation page, Depression. The article, Depression (mood) has undergone considerable change over the last 6 months or so. I am defending the present form, while advocating an additional section, on the talk page. I'm not sure how you'll respond to its present form, so please don't take this as canvassing. I'd appreciate your thoughts on its structure and content, if you have the time and interest. Cheers. --Anthonyhcole (talk) 15:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)

Request for comment

This message is being sent to you because you have previously edited the Wikipedia:Naming conventions (use English) page. There is currently a discussion that may result in a significant change to Wikipedia policy. Specifically, a consensus is being sought on if the policies of WP:UCN and WP:EN continues to be working policies for naming biographical articles, or if such policies have been replaced by a new status quo. This discussion is on-going at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (use English), and your comments would be appreciated. Dolovis (talk) 16:46, 19 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi from Wikia

Me, Jello Rabbit. Do you have any idea why I am blocked? They say my block is for disruption reasons and I didn't do anything wrong :p. Conker the Squirrel (talk) 22:05, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Old Man of the Mountain overlay 2.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Old Man of the Mountain overlay 2.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 20:48, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Old Man of the Mountain overlay 2.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Old Man of the Mountain overlay 2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Sannse. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

All files in category Unclassified Chemical Structures listed for deletion

One or more of the files that you uploaded or altered has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it/them not being deleted. Thank you.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of MGA73 (talk) at 18:19, 28 November 2011 (UTC).

File:WikiMeet London 2004-12-03 sann2.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:WikiMeet London 2004-12-03 sann2.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

• If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Sannse/Archive 7}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
  or use the {{own}} template.

• If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:53, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

File:WikiMeet London 2004-12-03 sann1.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:WikiMeet London 2004-12-03 sann1.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:59, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Sannse

I'd like to change my name on Wikipedia. You're the person to talk to, right? The Uncyclopedian (talk) 15:42, 2 March 2012 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing Sannse a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 17:06, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:57, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated , please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WJBscribe (talk) 00:05, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:28, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations!

Congratulations Sannse, your image Image:File:Beagle 600.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day! It looked like this:

Random picture of the day

A beagle

Image credit: Sannse (talk · contribs)

Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 23:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

File:TalriasGNC.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TalriasGNC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. MGA73 (talk) 16:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

We miss you! Here's a wiki-kitten to entice you to come back to Wikipedia!

_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:18, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grammy Award for Best Country Performance, Duo or Group – Vocal or Instrumental

The article Grammy Award for Best Country Performance, Duo or Group – Vocal or Instrumental has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable category, has been tagged for references for years now.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chillum 04:28, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin III.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Led Zeppelin - Led Zeppelin III.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:29, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Tunisian Arabic

Dear User,

As you are one of the contributors to Tunisian Arabic. You are kindly asked to review the part about Domains of Use and adjust it directly or through comments in the talk page of Tunisian Arabic.

Yours Sincerely,

--Csisc (talk) 12:40, 30 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Grammy Award for Best Instrumental Soloist Performance (without orchestra)

The article Grammy Award for Best Instrumental Soloist Performance (without orchestra) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No citations.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Skyllfully ^(talk | _contribs) 05:01, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Image use

One of your GNU FDL images was used here without attribution. 79.16.67.117 (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Hello Sannse. I found your Wikipedia page. I go by BooKyloRen on Fandom, so here's a kitten. Enjoy.

MusicalGenius711 (talk) 20:41, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Grammy Award for Best Performance by a Vocal Group or Chorus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grammy Award for Best Performance by a Vocal Group or Chorus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grammy Award for Best Performance by a Vocal Group or Chorus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ツStacey (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Dubya listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dubya. Since you had some involvement with the Dubya redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:43, 7 April 2017 (UTC)