User talk:Salimfadhley/Archives/2021/June

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Nomination of Sacha Stone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sacha Stone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacha Stone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Shrikanthv (talk) 07:10, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ogilvy (agency), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rory Sutherland. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 00:23, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rory Sutherland (advertising executive) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The draft would need secondary sources to show notability. Primary sources can be used to verify facts, but for a subject to be notable there has to be significant coverage in multiple reliable and secondary sources that are independent of the subject. At this point, only the medium.com source is secondary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Salimfadhley! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 09:35, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rory Sutherland (advertising executive) (June 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Might have some value at WP:Creative because of the book but then it needs to establish that. Otherwise, it looks like a non-notable corporate professional.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Rory Sutherland (advertising executive), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 08:20, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi Salimfadhley, please confirm at WP:RX that you received the copy of The Times article about Rory Sutherland. This allows that section to be closed. I see that your draft was declined again. Perhaps some additional sources will help. I found an article in The New York Times:

Elliott, Stuart (28 March 2010). "In a Test of Sales Savvy, Selling a Red Brick on YouTube". The New York Times.

Let me know if you want to have a copy of that article. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 14:23, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Yes please, this would be very useful indeed. Thank you. --Salimfadhley (talk) 16:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

This should be now in your inbox. Regards, AFBorchert (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Received --Salimfadhley (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)