User talk:Sailing to Byzantium/Archives/2013/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Your GA nomination of J.D.B. v. North Carolina
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article J.D.B. v. North Carolina you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Edge3 -- Edge3 (talk) 16:51, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
WikiCup 2014
Hi, if you haven't already, you should consider signing up for WikiCup 2014. Cheers, --Sp33dyphil ©hatontributions 02:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States v. Jones (2012)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article United States v. Jones (2012) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 14:26, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States v. Jones (2012)
The article United States v. Jones (2012) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:United States v. Jones (2012) for things which need to be addressed.
Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 19:14, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States v. Jones (2012)
The article United States v. Jones (2012) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:United States v. Jones (2012) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 14:52, 19 November 2013 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of United States v. Jones (2012)
The article United States v. Jones (2012) you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:United States v. Jones (2012) for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Quadell -- Quadell (talk) 13:42, 27 November 2013 (UTC)