User talk:Sahasu
Hi I am new to Wikipedia
Just here to help in regards to the somali history and the horn on Africa in general
Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Ajuran Sultanate. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:11, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice dianna I am new to editing their is so much more missing from this page in regards to ajuraan that should be in the page it's an empire that has had a positive lasting legacy in modern day Somalia and the horn especially in regards to its current situation Sahasu (talk) 21:22, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Sahasu, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Sahasu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 21 August 2019 (UTC) |
October 2019[edit]
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text into Somalis in the United Kingdom from another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 06:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
thank you i have provided all the pages that i have copied from before and for the British Somalis page I apologize for any inconveniences
- The names come from List of British Somalis, but not the descriptions you are adding. I don't think it's appropriate to copy that material across in any case. If you wish to do so, please discuss it on the article's talk page. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:47, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
fair enough i will keep the descriptions as it is thank you for the message
The article Horn Africans in the United Kingdom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
There's no clear reason for this article's existence, given that we have individual articles on the three groups that it collects together. Reliable sources don't seem to treat Horn Africans in the UK as a group.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:52, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
October 2019[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button
located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 12:54, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Somalis in the United Kingdom. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to losing your editing privileges. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:27, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
—this wasnt an edit warring you reverted it becosue i forgot to include some details and some details were forgotten i included them in the article so therfore i reverted it back, --Sahasu (talk) 14:30, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
- It's edit warring because you keep adding the same material despite being reverted. Moreover, you haven't provided attribution of the individual articles that the material is being copied from, and the addition of the infobox images goes against WP:NOETHNICGALLERIES, as I have pointed out. Please stop making these edits and discuss them on the article's talk page if you want to make them instead. Cordless Larry (talk) 14:35, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Horn Africans in the United Kingdom for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horn Africans in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horn Africans in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:37, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horn Africans in Scandinavia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horn Africans in Scandinavia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cordless Larry (talk) 17:44, 4 October 2019 (UTC)
Blocked[edit]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Kend94 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:49, 5 October 2019 (UTC) |
Sahasu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am not a sock puppet of that account I think the reason I was blocked was because I was edit warring but reverted many of my edits and I have been discussing my edits in the talk page prior to getting blocked I will follow Wikipedia guidelines I am new to Wikipedia and I have just started learning about how to use the website so I apologise for any inconvenience and I will keep discussions in the talk page where they belong
Decline reason:
You have not adequately addressed the sock puppetry; a simple denial is not sufficient. You will need to go into more detail about the situation and address why we think you have more than one account when you don't, or otherwise describe your relationship to the other account. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sahasu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
i checked the guys contributions apparently he doesnt leave any edit summary in almost all of his edits while i leave different edit summaries explaining my edits in the majority of my edits. i believe i was blocked becosue of a edit warr in the somalis in norway and somalis in denmark edits i explained most of my edits in the talk page and was conversing in the page for the majority o the time i also unedited many of my edits as suggested by the readers so i did listen to the editors and i did talk to them prior to engaging in any edit war Sahasu (talk) 09:36, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Sahasu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
remotely convincing how i checked the account and the reason why i got sockpuppetted was i apparently somehow used the same technique in creating new pages is that i copy a format from an existing page the reason why i did this was becosue i am new to wikipedia and i didnt quite know how to create pages or with templates the other thing is i checked the accounts edit history i literally dont have the same edit history as the account as that the account makes edits without leaving any summary while i have made edit summaries going in to details about almost all if not all of my edits explaining the reasons for my edits so how can i be a sockpuppet if my edit patterns are completely different i have also created this page with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Battle_of_Nechsar and thier was no accusation of sockpuppetry i used the same format is that i start of by copying the same pages then edit in new details and publish them the reason why i did this was becosue i didnt know how to create templates as i am new to wikipedia,also to add i did not make any similar edits on any similar pages that the account am allegged to be a sockpuppet of made, i havent made any edits on the same page as that account my edits were mostly somali and horn of african related pages while the other accounts edits were mostly on arab related pages like algerians in denmark or morrocans in Belgium etc
Decline reason:
Putting aside the sockpuppetry issue, it's quite apparent from your request that you do not have the competency in written English needed to contribute constructively. Your ability to make further appeals has been withdrawn. MER-C 10:51, 13 October 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Nechsar (December 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Nechsar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle of Nechsar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:Harar jugol, a page that you created, has been deleted. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:
- It appeared to be a test page. (See section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:33, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom block[edit]
You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-en
wikimedia.org).
Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.