User talk:Roanukz/Neuroscience

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q3. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Georgia Institute of Technology/Introduction to Neuroscience (Fall 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

1. Quality of Information: 2

2. Article size: 0

Need 9,000 More bytes.

3. Readability: 1

Language would be difficult to read by laypeople.

4. Refs: 2

Needs to have 10.

5. Links: 1

Only links once to another Wiki page.

6. Responsive to comments: 2

7. Formatting: 1

Does not have course banner tagged

8. Writing: 1

Well written, but largest paragraph was all about one original research (not supposed to have original research).

9. Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 1

Cannot find real name anywhere.

10. Outstanding?: 0

Needs significant work. _______________ Total: 11 out of 20

Ewatkins8 (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review from Nilton Yanez[edit]

Quality of Information: 1 (explain more in detail; some of us don't know much about the subject)
Article size: 0 (under 15 kB)
Readability: 1 (some people might not understand what you are saying; work a little on that)
Refs: 1 (more citations needed)
Links: 1 (not enough links)
Responsive to comments: 2
Formatting: 1 (no title; maybe organize the bulleted list in a different way, maybe just make it a heading with a higher level, no banner)
Writing: 2
Used real name or has real name on User TALK page: 2
Outstanding?: 1 (good, but needs more information; fix the problems)

Total: 12 out of 20

Nyanez1 (talk) 23:13, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, I have updated much of the article content and references, feel free to let me know what you think. Roanukz (talk) 02:52, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]