User talk:Riwnodennyk

Welcome

Hello, Riwnodennyk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are interested in Ukraine-related themes, you may want to check out the Ukraine Portal, particularly the Portal:Ukraine/New article announcements and Portal:Ukraine/Ukraine-related Wikipedia notice board. The New article announcements board is probably the most important and the most attended one. Please don't forget to announce there the new articles you create. Adding both boards to your watchlist is probably a good idea.

Finally, in case you are interested, similar boards exist at Russia portal as many editors contribute to topics related to both countries. The respective boards there are: Portal:Russia/New article announcements and Portal:Russia/Russia-related Wikipedia notice board. Of course there are also many other portals at Wikipedia or you may just get right into editing.

Again, welcome! —dima/talk/ 00:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

re: народна rather than народня? but why?

Народна is much more common in modern usage, than Народня, see google test: 492,000 for Українська Народна Республіка and 512 for Українська Народня Республіка. Even the Ukrainian Wikipedia article uses Народа. Also please cheack [1].. —dima/talk/ 01:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Montenegro

That comment wasn't really useful. ;)

Anyway, you'd oppose the will of the majority in favor of a minority? --PaxEquilibrium 15:28, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

i don't want to oppose anyone ;) --Riwnodennyk ✉ 15:51, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Not quite the message dispatched from that post. ;) --PaxEquilibrium 17:18, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Montenegrin

Lol... ;) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 13:35, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

listen! what is lol? i just want to know both of opinions to understand the truth, but my knowledge of Serbian Montegrin :) unfortunately isn't enough… --Riwnodennyk ✉ 13:55, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Lol is "laughing out laud". My knowledge is...well, native, and I'm of Montenegrin descent. :) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 19:01, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

i know, what “lol” means :) and i've never brought into question your Montenegrin nationality. i just want to conceive the cause of this war of edits --Riwnodennyk ✉ 19:09, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

..then don't feed the trolls. --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 21:51, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

Rusyn Wikipedia

Dear Riwnodennyk, thanks for your contribution to the Rusyn Wikipedia Project. To answer your question, I've started it and I'm now looking for people that speak Rusyn to develop it. I'm not a wikipedia expert (especially in page formating, and things like that, so I think that the mainpage is to be redone by someone specialist.) I dont really know if I should add it in request before it reaches at least 100 articles : in fact many people will probably put negative arguments because it doesn't have many articles up to now. I think you also know that Rusyn Wikipedia isn't a very good news for some people too... So I think we must work a bit on it. You asked for some resources to learn Rusyn. I dont know very much about that but I'll give you what I know. Unfortunately, and due to some antirusyn activities of the Ukrainian governement (see http://www.lemko.org/rusyn/kurasen.html ) there isn't a unified Rusyn language for all Rusyn people yet. However there are 4 codified dialects, that the rusyn academy is now working to unifie (in 2008, I think, there will be codifided standarts for the United Rusyn language). To find lessons of Lemko-Rusyn you may go here: http://lemkowyna.net/index.php?option=content&task=section&id=13&Itemid=65 you may also order books to learn Rusyn or ask questions on http://www.rusynacademy.sk/ There are some pdf formats of rusyn books on http://lemko.org/books/index.html If you live in Ukraine, there are maybe possibilities to look on http://www.padyak.com/about.aspx (it hasn't been updated for ages...) and to contact. If you happen to be in Uzhhorod there are some Rusyn bookshops, maybe there will be some studying material there.. Rusyn (talk) 18:43, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

oh, thanks for all these links!!! however, a little question: do both Pannonian Rusyns and Carpatho-Rusyns want to be unified in single language? or these 2 are fully divided? hm, whole this situation with Rusyns and Ukrainians nowadays looks like relation between Ukrainian and Russian hundred year ago :-\ --Riwnodennyk ✉ 19:24, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

I think they'll only unite norms for Polish, Slovak and Ukrainian Rusyns. Panonian Rusyn is comprehensible for Subcarpathian Rusyns, but it's a bit too dofferent and it turned more Serbian and Hungarian... 84.226.49.97 (talk) 20:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

IPA

Serhii Vasylkivsky, could you check the IPA for this entry?--Riurik^(discuss) 20:27, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

no problem. imho, the best thing as yet is to follow Ukrainian phonology article. --Riwnodennyk ✉ 22:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Cool, that looks good. I may drop by for other stuff like this, if you don't mind. Thanks --Riurik^(discuss) 23:29, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Donbas secessionism

An editor has nominated Donbas secessionism, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donbas secessionism and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:59, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Template:User Don Cossack

Move {{Template:User Don Cossack}} into a subpage of your userspace per the Wikipedia:Userbox migration, thanks. 72.67.104.27 (talk) 01:05, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Y Made --Riwnodennyk ✉ 11:24, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Bosniaks

Greetings. I've noticed you are one of the editors who has edited the Bosniaks article. I was wondering if you would have any input into a few "revert wars" happening lately over there. Here's a diff. Personally, I think the changes are biased, a little racist/xenophobic, but mostly, they are wrong.

P.S, I've sent this message to a few of the users I've seen in the talk page history to try to get a discussion started. 121.222.199.140 (talk) 10:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Anton Chekhov

I researched the question of whether Chekhov was Ukrainian while preparing the article for FAC. Although he has been translated as on one occasion saying that he was Ukrainian, this is not repeated by scholars, as far as I can see. Clearly he was not Ukrainian, because he was born and bred in Taganrog. It is true that he had relations on one side who were Ukrainian, but that is not the same thing. I remember asking around about this, and Alex Bakharev and Ghirlandajo both confirmed that he is not Ukrainian; apparently, the word he used in describing himself has been faultily translated as "Ukrainian" and means something more elusive. By all means bring the question up on the talk page. qp10qp (talk) 13:12, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Taganrog was a typical Ukrainian city on Ukrainian ethnic territory until it was transferred to Russia in 1926, however local people in the villages around Taganrog still speak Ukrainian nowadays. If you asked Russians about Chekhov, chauvinism is usual for them, majority of Russians simply want to occupy Ukraine, they say that there are no Ukrainians at all. IMHO, it's like to ask Arabs about Jews. I hope we'll believe information, not private opinion.--Riwnodennyk ✉ 19:23, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Communist Party of Ukraine - ideology

Hi! I see there's some contention about whether to include Russophillia as an ideology of the Communist Party of Ukraine. Rather than allowing this to develop into an edit-war, Would you consider expanding the article by explaining the party's ideologies? It help to support claims of ideological leanings with citations, which would defend against allegations of POV. If and when concensus is agreed among interested editors concerning the content of the article the "ideology" summary in the info box could then be updated to reflect the body of the article. Thanks -- Timberframe (talk) 08:38, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

How long do you intend to revert for?

Honestly what is your problem there? I gave sources for that presently Cossacks not in sense of a hobby by a few Ukrainian activists, but in terms of ethnic minority kind are all considered part of the Russian peoples. So why do you continue to revert, in absense of any evidence on talk page that they are not? Again the list is not formatted for ethnic groups that historically inhabited Europe, but only its present inhabitants. And presently there no such thing as ethnic Ukrainian Cossacks. --Kuban Cossack 16:11, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Anyhow before you revert the map again, be sure to check that Eastern Sloboda has now been added per source, and that I've reduced the profile of Russians in Ukraine. --Kuban Cossack 16:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

It's great! --Riwnodennyk ✉ 16:52, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Credible author

Hello. A credible authors' reference is being "overrided" by edit-warring. I recently tried to add to the telescope article but this editor seems to think that his opinion overrides a VERY credible author in Mr. Richard Powers. I've been blocked before for edit-warring recently, so I don't want this to be another incident on my record.

Anyway, the other editor seemed to have asked his friend-type editors to form a consensus, so I will do the same. The Islamic connection here is, Al-Haytham. He is FUNDAMENTAL to the telescope and the FATHER of optics. By definition, the summary can include him since the radio and electro-magnetic telescopes are derogatory to the average person looking at the article; I wanted to add it to the history section since it looked cleaner. Can you help your fellow InternetHero?? InternetHero (talk) 21:02, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Soviet era media

Thanks for adding that interesting detail, I wasn't aware of this. But for the article's sake, do you have a reference for this legislation on Soviet films and cartoons? --Bogdan ^що? 18:09, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Soviet media is simply considered as national because of the fact, that Ukraine was a part of the SU. [2][3]--Riwnodennyk ✉ 19:28, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Павлюченко

Откуда у Павлюченко украинские корни, или Вы судите по фамилии? JukoFF (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

По фамилии и по месту рождения. Кем может быть человек с украинской фамилией, родившийся в казачей станице? Хотя всё довольно относительно и условно, может и Ющенко не украинец, если не брать во внимание, что фамилия украинская да родился в украинском селе--Riwnodennyk ✉ 16:06, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

Tahanrih is Taganrog in Russian

Really??? Funny, in all Russian literature I see Taganrog, in all Ukrainian literature I see Taharoh and now you're saying Tahanrih is Taganrog in Russian? So is Taganrog now not-Russian??? Shocking. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 16:51, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Google it. [4][5]--Riwnodennyk ✉ 21:11, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Spanish google with 35 hits... EoU, made by a former Nazi collaborator Kujibovich... Sounds like a made up word to me. Even non-official names like Yekaterinoslav get 10 thousand hits. The Ukrainian version Katerynovslav gets 2.5 thousand, yet Taharih gets 35...Please, I insist its Taganrog. --Kuban Cossack (По-балакаем?) 16:50, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

No content in Category:2012 elections in Europe

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:2012 elections in Europe, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:2012 elections in Europe has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:2012 elections in Europe, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:40, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Award!

For [this] and your other work on Ukrainian topics, I hereby award you the Ukrainian Barnstar of National Merit. Note the raspberry color of the ribbon, the historical color of the Dnieper Cossacks. — Mariah-Yulia (talk) 18:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! :) --Riwnodennyk ✉ 18:16, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Your edits

Hi, please go and read our Manual of Style. Though it seems you've been editing since 2008, some of your edits suggest you may not be aware of how some things are done on Wikipedia. There are certain times you are encouraged to be bold, but renaming a page, for example, is only done after discussion with other editors. This is not something you decide to do on your own. We use the most common or established name (in Western sources) for articles—names English readers are most familiar with, e.g. Kiev vs. Kyiv. Nor do we emphasize ethnicity in the opening paragraph of biographies, as you did at Nikolay Davydenko, per MOS:BIO. It's great to state this information somewhere in the article, but we don't emphasize ethnicity because that leads us down the dark path of nationalism. Thanks. --98.232.98.144 (talk) 06:38, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Accusations in fascism

There is a well sourced and thoroughly made map on the Ukrainian language usage in the world, one of the users inserted it into the article on Ukrainian language. You chose to reverted the edit with the following summary: "rv Russian fascism". Now how would you explain this? --Ahnode (talk) 20:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

What was the reason for regarding my edit as fascism? — Glebchik (talk) 17:41, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

It's a goal only for the enemies of Ukraine to limit the bounds of Ukrainian language.--Riwnodennyk ✉ 18:07, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I personally do not regard cited map sources as enemies of Ukraine. If you have some additional information that could benefit the map, you can always fill in a request at the Graphic Lab in order to improve it. As for now, I think that this particular map is more appropriate than yours. CheckUsage shows that it is used on 14 pages in 13 projects. It is specifically focused on the distribution of Ukrainian language around the world and has nothing to do with ethnicity. Hence the very name of the File:Ukrainians en.svg it was replaced with. Moreover, taking into consideration the sources of your map, it is absolutely out of date. So I suggest that we use the previous map for an article, and work on it in Graphic Lab if you are not satisfied with it. I would also ask you to apologise and refrain from future faulty accusations, as it can be considered as a form of a personal attack. --Ahnode (talk) 20:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I agree with you concerning outdating. However there is a great problem of modern self-identification. To be Ukrainian is shameful abroad, that's why according to modern census you'll find no Ukrainins there, but you can go to any land and you'll here Ukrainian language. Such a paradox. Therefore using the last fair censuses is the most easy way to outline the borders of Ukrainian.--Riwnodennyk ✉ 03:12, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Fully trust the sources given for File:Ukrainian lang.png. But visiting references found no maps. I think, the links should be given more correctly. As of references for File:Ukrainians en.svg, I can grant the scanned page of “Atlas of the Ukrainian history (1914-1939) - ISBN 978-9669-538192”, which contain the exact borders, if you need. Concerning the talk page of File talk:Ukrainian lang.png it is though to be rather negotiated map, but not good sourced. I'd like to be mistaken about this. --Riwnodennyk ✉ 03:22, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll talk to User:Olegzima and see whether he can provide more specific sources. Since both maps are either inaccurate or out of date, I think we should consider making a new file. --Ahnode (talk) 17:36, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Whilst this was already brought to your attention, I would like to make it clear that you should not use edit summaries to offend others. We insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors on Wikipedia. Please do not do this again. Thank you. Nja²⁴⁷ 14:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Timoshenko

Hello, Riwnodennyk. You have new messages at Ezhiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 14:08, July 16, 2009 (UTC)

Languages of Ukraine

Is this edit correct? Looks like probable vandalism, especially taking into account that the IP's from Pakistan.--//microcell 18:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

So, what can you respond? I see that you are a little, but active here; perhaps you may know about this subject. --//microcell 19:08, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, how are you? I just saw a post in Archive, and I remember your support of Montenegrin language in 2007. I would like to thanks you for that, and we might have some discussion over that matter so I guess we can expect your support and arguments. Cheers! Rave92^(talk) 00:32, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Ukrainian Russian

An article that you have been involved in editing, Ukrainian Russian, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ukrainian Russian. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. windyhead (talk) 16:31, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sho magazine.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sho magazine.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Lipița culture images

Hi! I noticed you are listed as an . I wonder if you can help us elucidating the source and the age of some Talk:Lipiţa culture#Lipița culture images. Thanks a lot and best regards.--Codrin.B (talk) 18:02, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luhansk Oblast may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Luhansk Oblast''' ({{lang-uk|Луганська область}}, [[Romanization of Ukrainian|translit.]] ''Luhans’ka oblast’'', {{

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:50, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Xarkiw listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Xarkiw. Since you had some involvement with the Xarkiw redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 03:25, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Lymonnyk for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lymonnyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lymonnyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iryna Harpy (talk) 00:56, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Riwnodennyk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

moved page Sergei Polunin to Sergii Polunin: Fixed the name according to the official

According to the official what? The source you entered is invalid, the name Sergii is not used in any official source of the artist.

LilyLilac88 (talk) 13:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)LilyLila

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Riwnodennyk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Riwnodennyk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Job Boretsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)

Borscht video transcription

Hi Riwnodennyk! Perhaps you would be intersted in helping me with adding subtitles to the video that is used to illustrate Borscht? I already asked for help at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ukraine, but there doesn't seem to be much traffic over there. What I need is a transcription, in Ukrainian, of what is being said in the video. I can read Ukrainian, but don't undertand spoken Ukrainian very well. Once I have a transcription, then I can translate it into English and the subtitles. Please let me know, if you would be willing to work on it. — Kpalion^(talk) 13:12, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alternate forms for the name John, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ivanko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Ethnicelebs.com as a source

Hi Riwnodennyk . I noticed that you recently used XXXXXX.com as a source for biographical information in Greg Bryk. Please note that the general consensus as expressed at WP:RSN is that it does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. I've gone ahead and removed it. If you disagree, let's discuss it. You may want to check WP:RSP and WP:RSN to help determine if a source is reliable. Thanks.--Hipal (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)