User talk:Rbfitz0529

Hello, Rbfitz0529, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. —EqualRights (talk) 01:51, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Removing content from homosexuality[edit]

Please note that if this was not an accident, just explain to me why the section should be removed, and I'll be happy to let you re-remove it, cheers Spitfire^Tally-ho! 06:41, 5 March 2009 (UTC) I see that, but removal of content from pages is quite a serious matter, please state simply why the article homosexuality should not have a section about homosexuality in animals, the article is not dedicated only to humans, although the information might be found elsewhere in wikipedia, having a section about it in homosexuality hardly hurts, correct? Thanks Spitfire^Tally-ho! 06:57, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've reverted my edits, sorry for the misunderstanding, and keep up all the great work, nice to have you in wikipedia Spitfire^Tally-ho! 07:14, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to not understand Wikipedia. Are you coming from Conservapedia? (since you used their sources). Just because "Homophobia" and "Homosexuality in Animals" have their own articles does not mean that those topics cant be mentioned in "Homosexuality". Heres an unrelated example: Germany. History of Germany has its own article, yet German history is also mentioned in Germany. There are just more details in History of Germany.

So do not remove that section w/o reaching to consensus, since several people reverted you. If you belive that section is not WP:NPOV, you can try to make it so or put a POV tag. Phoenix of9 (talk) 20:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, next time, read your own source. Your edit here: [1] is not supported by the source [2]. Wikipedia is not your soapbox.

To Phoenix09: Your above commentary is personal and libellous and inappropriate. You need to refrain from making unwarranted and indefensible personal attacks or suggestive name-calling or labelling in Wikipedia talk sections. If that sort of discussion continues I will complain to Wikipedia. SECOND WARNING. You have not been given power to suggest credential or "credential resumes" for Wikipedia editors. You are also making "value-loaded" and non-neutral comments in the talk section. Rbfitz0529 (talk) 21:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take it to: Talk:Homosexuality. Phoenix of9 (talk) 19:57, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]