User talk:Ratio Decidendi

Ratio Decidendi

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ratio Decidendi! Thank you for your contributions. I am Nthep and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

NtheP (talk) 11:27, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sentencing in England and Wales[edit]

Sentencing in E&W - that's quite a topic to take on. It looks like you're covering just the current framework, not the history? That's fine as an approach but you would need to mention this is the lead paragraph when you get round to writing it. You might also want to consider splitting youth sentencing off from adult as they are both large topics and doing both in one might lead to an article that is too bulky. NtheP (talk) 11:38, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

yes it is a long topic, i figure it will take me about one to two days, I shall be adding a history section (need to find my copy of the english legal system first) and current developments section. Feel free to add to it in my user space, hopefully I shall get around to publishing it in the main space tonight or tomorrow and get some did you knows on the main page. Once again thanks for the welcome.

Kind regards --Ratio Decidendi (talk) 11:43, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

I've brought your reply over here so the conversation is in one place, I've got this page on my watch list for the time being so I can see if you reply or you can use {{talkback}} to leave me a notice on my talk page.

I was looking at the referencing you've used and some points which might help.

Ref names ref name="The Criminal Justice Act 2003 2003 c. 44 Part 12 Chapter 1 Matters to be taken into account in sentencing Section 142 is a bit long. The benefit of ref name is that it's easy to reuse - I's suggest something shorter like ref name=CJA2003s142 That way when you want reuse that reference later in the article then all you need to type is <ref name=CJA2003s142/> - note the / at the end of the name
Publisher and work in {{cite web}}. I'd suggest that the work is |work=legislation.gov.uk and publisher is |publisher=The National Archives Personally I wouldn't bother with Part and Chapter as the section number is specific enough to provide the location within the act, but I would include |isbn=9 780105 444039
Case citations. Try and avoid subscription websites like lexisweb especially if the summary available on the non subscription page doesn't directly support the point you're trying to make. If it's not available somewhere like http://www.bailii.org/ then use the print reference after a suitable quote e.g. It has been held that the purpose of sentencing is to protect the public . . .<ref>R v Winkler [2004] All ER (D) 33 (Sep) Rafferty J, page 34</ref>. Sadly there isn't a cite template for UK law reports yet so you have to be a bit creative ({{Cite court}} is very US-centric), the basis for referencing them is to be found at Case citation#United Kingdom.

Happy to help any further if I can. NtheP (talk) 13:52, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I have had a go at the first section of the article - I hope my changes are not considered to be too drastic. This is a huge subject and will require quite a lot of developing, although the basic approach is sound. So if you don't mind, I'll carry on copy editing over the next few days and adding a bit more legal info. and references where appropriate. All the best Shaibalahmar (talk) 10:23, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Chambers and Partners[edit]

A tag has been placed on Chambers and Partners, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. MikeWazowski (talk) 22:42, 13 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

Your addition to Chambers and Partners has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. nancy 05:15, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Theories of criminal sentencing in England and Wales[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Theories of criminal sentencing in England and Wales. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Sentencing in England and Wales. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Sentencing in England and Wales - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. nancy 05:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Old Square Chambers[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Old Square Chambers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. nancy 05:40, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

A number of the articles you have created have been removed this morning as it has been identified that you are copying text direct from copyright sources which do not have a licence compatible with Wikipedia. This is known as a copyright violation. For legal reasons Wikipedia is unable to accept such text. I have reviewed your contributions and have - for those which have not yet been removed - tagged potential problems however please can you review those which are untagged and remove any text which you copied from elsewhere.

Copyright violations are treated very seriously on Wikipedia and whilst we will always give new contributors the benefit of the doubt regarding their intentions, persistent violators should expect to be blocked from editing

Please don't hesitate to contact me if you need any help with this although I should warn you that I am not only editing intermittently at the moment so may take some time to respond.

Kind regards, nancy 05:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikki and John Pranksters in Love for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikki and John Pranksters in Love is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikki and John Pranksters in Love until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:01, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Infobox House (TV series) season 8 episode list[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:Infobox House (TV series) season 8 episode list requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Deprecation of this form of template per result of discussion at Template talk:Infobox television episode#Season list template

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Alex^TW 08:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]