User talk:RafiUbeda

Welcome![edit]

Hello, RafiUbeda, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 00:37, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Tarheel95[edit]

Hello, RafiUbeda. You have new messages at Tarheel95's talk page.
Message added 22:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Tarheel95 (Talk) 22:22, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aztec Records (January 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JSFarman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Significant coverage specifically about Aztec Records is required in order to establish notability. Please ping me if you need help (or are ready to resubmit).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Aztec Records and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Aztec Records, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

JSFarman (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, RafiUbeda! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JSFarman (talk) 17:15, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Aztec Records has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Aztec Records. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iñaki Gil de San Vicente moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Iñaki Gil de San Vicente, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:14, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on University of Seville[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page University of Seville, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings and...[edit]

Hi RafiUbeda! Thanks for your note and for taking the time to overhaul the article. I can't right now, but will have a look at it later. In the meantime, you're welcome to remove the tags yourself ("... when the issue has been adequately addressed"). Regards, --Technopat (talk) 09:23, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

IESE review[edit]

Hi again! Thanks for your note. I'm afraid I shall have to enter a nolle prosequi on that one. I am very much against paid editing on Wikipedia, and I see that one of the other major contributors to that page is a paid editor. I shall, however, slap an additional maintenance template on it because it needs a serious copyedit. Sorry not to be more helpful but, as I commented, it's a matter of principle and I will not, knowingly, at least, help Wikipedians who are being paid for their "collaboration". Regards, --Technopat (talk) 18:16, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iñaki Gil de San Vicente[edit]

Hello, RafiUbeda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iñaki Gil de San Vicente, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iñaki Gil de San Vicente[edit]

Hello, RafiUbeda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iñaki Gil de San Vicente".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Aguarecords Productions[edit]

Hello RafiUbeda, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Aguarecords Productions, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aguarecords Productions.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:58, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, RafiUbeda. Thank you for your work on Ya.com. Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Appropriately objective and business-focused, as one would expect for a defunct company. There are a few more redlinks than I think are warranted (the notability of those websites is questionable, and it's best to establish notability first).

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 17:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

República Móvil[edit]

Hi RafiUbeda. República Móvil, a page that you created a few months ago, does not appear to meet our criteria for inclusion as a separate page about a company (WP:NCORP) which may be different from the criteria used by other language versions of Wikipedia. Because of this, I have blanked and redirected the page to the parent company, Orange España. The page's history is preserved and it is possible to restore the article: If you believe that this page should remain included on Wikipedia or that this action was taken in error, then you may revert the edit that blanked and redirected the page.

It also appears that you translated text from the Spanish Wikipedia version of the page (es:República Móvil). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Alpha3031 (t • c) 13:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]