User talk:Radboner

July 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. One or more of the external links you added in this edit to the page Trapt do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. You may wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. -- Jack?! 21:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Trapt. Inappropriate links include links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that serve as advertising or promotion. Thank you. -- Jack?! 21:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you use Wikipedia for advertising, as you did with Trapt, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Jack?! 21:22, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Here is one of wikipedia's rules: External links to commercial organizations are acceptable if they identify major organizations which are the topic of the article. Is www.facebook.com/trapt not an acceptable external link to a commercial organization that identifies a major organization like the band TRAPT? I would really like an explanation as to why the band trapt can not add a link to it's official band page. I also left a message for you about the fact that the band started in August of 1997. I don't know where you got your information from, but as the vocalist in trapt, I can say that that is not true. The bass player and I were just barely learning our intruments in 1995.

February 2012[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Trapt, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Wiki13 (talk) 19:54, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trapt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Edinburgh Wanderer 19:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Trapt. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. DVdm (talk) 20:22, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:08, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Trapt shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Blocked for making legal threats[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Manning (talk) 08:41, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Above block relates to this edit. Manning (talk) 08:43, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Radboner. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. N^oformation ^Talk 09:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]