Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
None of these articles call these things "Ghost Airports"
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hello, Qaqa2024!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Stuartyeates Hi. When you say None of these articles call these things "Ghost Airports" you meant about ghosts like creature or like previously used but abandoned? Qaqa2024 (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean that for an article called The Phenomenon of Ghost Airports in the United States we expect the supporting references to point to secondary sources with in depth coverage of 'The Phenomenon of Ghost Airports in the United States'. I know nothing about airports, but the draft may be better named Draft:Abandoned airports of the United States or something. To be honest, though, most of the sources are just lists with no in-depth coverage, so I'm not sure about even that. Stuartyeates (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks a lot! There is «List of defunct airports in the United States» post, so name «Abandoned airports of the United States» isn't ok. I need a time for reform my draft to some another with phenomenon of abandoned airports. Qaqa2024 (talk) 22:25, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Qaqa2024, I concur with @Stuartyeates and actually suggested you create a new article following a similar named format. I would recommend maybe improving List of defunct airports in the United States instead? You just have to be really careful that you are not writing original research on Wikipedia. Qcne(talk) 10:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PARAKANYAA was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
This seems to be Original Research. I wonder if you could work this into a new article called List of abandoned airports in the United States instead, without the original research?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hi, I can't understand why you see my text like original research? I should get some parts of texts from another website, rewrite my own and make publication? I'm trying to make an article for reviewing phenomenon, but not like a list of abandoned airports. I have seen an article called List of abandoned airports in the United States, and say it to Stuartyeates but it's not the same. Qaqa2024 (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
