User talk:Professor Chaos

Haha[edit]

Haha, I edited the navigation line in Stanley's Cup to be more friendly, but I think I like your version better. Milto LOL pia 08:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Decemberists[edit]

No, really, it's The Tain. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I didn't change that. I reverted edits by some retard without an account who put in a comment under the green screen challenge that said something like: "Colbert won the challenge, that says something about this 'band'." The whole thing of course was rigged, Funk lost to Peter Frampton, not Colbert. I reverted that. Professor Chaos 19:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I missed the part you reverted below that. It seems your reversion nailed some real vandalism, too. My apologies. --badlydrawnjeff talk 19:53, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

South Park[edit]

Hello. I'm a South Park fan in Greece, where the series is quite unknown. As I have stumbled upon a site for watching the episodes for free, I would like to know in which episode Mr.Mackey gets high on LSD. Could you tell me? I figured that, as a member of the South Park WikiProject, you would know. --Orthologist 23:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's in the second season, episode 204, called "Ike's Wee Wee." While the kids try to save Kyles younger brother Ike from a curcumcision, Mr. Mackey gets in trouble for passing marijuana around the class. Also, I am curious to know this website you have stumbled upon. Professor Chaos 06:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)[edit]

In 2007, as part of its Fourth Assessment Report, the IPCC concluded that human actions are "very likely" the cause of global warming, meaning a 90% or greater probability.^[1]

"The world's leading climate scientists said global warming has begun, is very likely caused by man, and will be unstoppable for centuries, ... . The phrase very likely translates to a more than 90 percent certainty that global warming is caused by man's burning of fossil fuels. That was the strongest conclusion to date, making it nearly impossible to say natural forces are to blame."[1]

"The report said that an increase in hurricane and tropical cyclone strength since 1970 more likely than not can be attributed to man-made global warming. The scientists said global warming's connection varies with storms in different parts of the world, but that the storms that strike the Americas are global warming-influenced."[2]

"On sea levels, the report projects rises of 7-23 inches by the end of the century. That could be augmented by an additional 4-8 inches if recent surprising polar ice sheet melt continues."[3]

The IPCC was the official study of the UNFCCC, the UN in other words the IPCC had the participation of over one hundred eighty nations and their leading researchers, the United States being one of those participants. As a Result this study represents the total consensus of the global scientific community, just take the inter wikilinks for more info.

The Wikipedia Song (Ich habe keinen Eintrag bei Wikipedia)[edit]

Dear Professor Chaos, I've just read here, that you are searching the song lyrics. I've written them down quickly for you, but I didn't translate it, because it would take a very long time and it would not be correct, because my english is not the best. So here it is:

ICH HABE KEINEN EINTRAG BEI WIKIPEDIA

Ich habe keinen Eintrag bei Wikipedia, drum frag ich mich manchmal, bin ich wirklich da?
Bin ich wirklich existent, oder bild' ich's mir nur ein,
denn wäre es so, dann müßt' der Eintrag doch da sein.

Ich habe keinen Eintrag bei Wikipedia,
ich kann doch nicht real sein, das ist schon mal klar.
Meine Existenz ist für mich sehr umstritten,
und such' ich bei Google wird auch schwer gelitten.
Nicht mal tausend Treffer, was heißt das hier schon,
bei Milliarden Seiten scheint das fast wie Hohn.
Nur weil da mein Name steht, steht da nichts über mich,
und bei der Bildersuche sieht keiner mein Gesicht.

Ich habe keinen Eintrag bei Wikipedia,
drum frag ich mich manchmal, bin ich wirklich da?
Bin ich wirklich existent, oder bild' ich's mir nur ein,
denn wäre es so, dann müßt' der Eintrag doch da sein.

Bei youtube läuft ein Video mit mir im Abspann,
das wär immerhin ein Indiz: Du bist am Leben, Mann.
Im Duden such ich vergeblich, naja war zu erwarten,
das Telefonbuch gibt mir Hoffnung und Branchenbücher Atem.
Doch das ist alles regional und vielleicht gefälscht,
es gibt nur eine Sache die als Beweis zählt.
Neben Sigmund Freud, bei Dumbo und Plektrum
sollte doch auch ich steh'n, Wikipedia ergo sum.

Ich habe keinen Eintrag bei Wikipedia,
drum frag ich mich manchmal, bin ich wirklich da?
Bin ich wirklich existent, oder bild' ich's mir nur ein,
denn wäre es so, dann müßt' der Eintrag doch da sein.

Greetings, User Mascobado from the German Wikipedia. --84.57.83.137 00:02, 25 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Night_of_the_Living_Homeless[edit]

Night_of_the_Living_Homeless, stop adding the Tony Hawk reference, it completely destroys any credit you used to have as a wikipedia editor and makes you seem like a 12 year old adding made up fan fluff. There is zero connection between ANY south park episode and Tony Hawk 2, so please do not add it any more. There's a good boy JayKeaton 06:00, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to point this out to anyone who happens to read this. I don't know how old this guy is, but he's telling me to be mature; I find the condescending tone quite irritating. One of my goals as part of the South Park Wikiproject is to shrink the trivia sections to zero if possible, without discarding relevant information. Someone else added a trivia to Night of the Living Homeless pointing out that Cartman jumping his skateboard over homeless people is similar to a Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 2 challenge. I thought it sounded plausible, so rather than deleting it (as is my habit), I worked it into the synopsis. I'm going going to put it back, but I'm going to put a "citation needed" tag. If anyone can verify it, then take the tag out. If you feel the need to delete it, please feel free to be more mature than JayKeaton. Professor Chaos 02:10, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Tony Hawk "reference" has no place on that page JayKeaton 07:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, it may be a stretch. Someone else put it there, and I was sure that if I deleted it it would show right back up, so I decided to work it in instead, because it sounded somewhat plausible (what if Matt or Trey are a Tony Hawk game fan?). As I worked it in, I thought, "this might be true," so I put it back myself. I should have put a tag on it. It doesn't mean I have no credibility, or that you can go making a fool of yourself with your comments. Professor Chaos 13:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"If they liked it" is a weasel word, I try to leave out weasel words, thank you. I used my better judgment and deleted it, I knew it had no place on that page and I knew it had to go. I never said you didn't have any credibility, in fact I had never even noticed your username until you messaged me. I don't know why you think I would say you specifically have no credibility, but I AM certain that I am not the one you should be talking to about that little problem. Look, I'm sorry, but the Tony Hawk bit just has to stay deleted. JayKeaton 18:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, lay off the Tony Hawk thing! It looks like it's back, and guess what: I didn't put it there! Just like I didn't the first time, JayKeaton! I would have deleted it, I routinely delete trivia, but I thought it was pointless as it would just show up again. I also would like it out of the article, unless there's direct evidence that it's true. You seem to think I'm crusading to have Tony Hawk included in this article, the only thing I'm complaining about is that you insulted my credibility (direct quote from you on my talk page: "completely destroys any credit you used to have as a wikipedia editor and makes you seem like a 12 year old adding made up fan fluff"), then denied it. I don't care what you do about Tony Hawk, but don't go after other editors with good track records when you don't know what you're talking about! Professor Chaos 17:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dude, it's been almost exactly a week since you last posted. Have you been looking at the SP page waiting for it to come back? Are you stalking me or summat?!? That is not cool man. Your time would be better spent fixing other pages or working out at the gym, to be honest. You seem to be looking for some kind of reassurance, so um, yeah, your great, your a super editor. Keep up the good work and, boy, don't ever doubt yourself. Now give it a rest JayKeaton 18:41, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for voting on my poll! FictionH 21:18, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at MacBook Pro, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nja247 (talk • contribs) 09:51, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here's why I did it, this is from the top of the talk page, in bold: "This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the MacBook Pro article. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject." The comment was unsigned, or I'd have put a polite note on his talk page. Professor Chaos 14:17, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your tagged article...[edit]

Thanks for not bashing... for once someone genuine is on Wikipedia! :-) Feel free to use the sandbox if you need to test out your future articles beforehand. Hope your editing will improve and contribute interesting and informative articles to Wikipedia! Happy editing! - Jameson L. Tai ^{talk ♦ contribs} 04:58, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: South Park Articles[edit]

Not a problem, mate - I've seen your edits to the SP articles, so I owe just as much thanks to you for help with them! ≈ The Haunted Angel 18:19, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Epthitachyphtaliphtherdipthyclicstalacious[edit]

A tag has been placed on Epthitachyphtaliphtherdipthyclicstalacious, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jminthorne (talk) 06:01, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jminthorne (talk) 06:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia without further notice. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:08, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hahaha! Wow, this is serious business, apparently... seriously, though, what does that word mean? Professor Chaos (talk) 06:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Professor Chaos. You have new messages at Hell in a Bucket's talk page.
Message added 06:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Hell In A Bucket (talk) 06:28, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Warming 'very likely' human-made". BBC News. BBC. 2007-02-01. Retrieved 2007-02-01. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[1] "Warming 'very likely' human-made". BBC News. BBC. 2007-02-01. Retrieved 2007-02-01. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[1]