User talk:PradeepArya1109

Welcome!

Hello, PradeepArya1109, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sceptr e ^(Talk) 23:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WP:IAR Revert[edit]

Sorry. I hadn't realized the original text was important on WP:IAR. A bit like wine I suppose, even if a duplicate is chemically the same, the vintage makes it worth the price tag. I'll create a section on the talk page so we can hammer out a new version (a little more slowly this time). :-) /* Pradeep Arya 10:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC) */[reply]

No problem! :) Just tread carefully and check the edit history since there's been a lot of debate about this in the past. The current version may not be that stable but it is a compromise of sorts between what different people want this page to say. - Haukur 11:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus Forge 2006[edit]

I moved your Consensus forge post at the WP:IAR talk page to its own Misc page at Wikipedia:Consensus_Forge_2006. --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 12:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need you to look over something[edit]

Hi,

I'm taking steps to lodge a formal complaint against User:Theodore7 due to various reasons that I'm sure that you are aware of, or have experienced by now. Right now I have a rough draft of the complaint that I would like to have some people look over, add to, correct, and sign if they agree with it. I've never had to do anything like this before, so if you would please take some time to take a look at it and give me some feedback, suggestions, support, etc., then I would really appreciate it. It can be found here: [1] Thank you. --Chris Brennan 06:25, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Overwriting[edit]

> Err, uh, Quota, you kinda squashed my edit > on Talk:Algorithm. I know it wasn't intentional; but please > be careful, okay? :-)

I didn't see it or touch it -- suspect you started your edit after I had started edit and managed to save before I did? quota

Our Agreement on Algorithm[edit]

You know Pradeep, we came to an agreement, and yet, I find you signed your name as if I am some kind of troublemaker. What is with that? Theo 15:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I signed my name to certify that a dispute exists. You will admit there is some tension between you and other editors on some aritcles, no?

Yes, especially when it comes to not citing sources, but claiming POV as being "NPOV" when it obviously is not, so, yes.Theo 08:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You'll note I also wrote an outside view reminding the other editors to assume good faith in you, and remind them of the things that show you are improving (your apology to R.Koot, your agreement with me on Algorithm), as I believe these could have easily been lost in the shuffle of editing, reverts, and long (sometimes heated) discussion.

I endorsed my own view, and the view of Bishonen. You'll note that both views suggest you need to work on working with other editors, but that your intentions are good. PL's view suggested banning you Wikipedia; I did not endorse that, and because I don't believe it would be right.

Thanks, I appreciate that.Theo 08:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm willing to discuss any aspect of your RfC with you; be it here, e-mail, IM, or whatever. Just let me know. —Pradeep Arya (Talk | Contrib) 12:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, regarding algorithm, no problem. Let me know when you've had time to read some of the sources. Again, congrats on your marriage.Theo 08:09, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Computer science[edit]

Just thought you might wanted to know that several Wikipedians are trying to revive WikiProject Computer science. Cheers, —Ruud 14:32, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WikiProject CS[edit]

Hi, and welcome to WikiProject Computer science! Glad to have you onboard. --Allan McInnes 16:48, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CMMI[edit]

Saw your note on Talk:Process area (CMMI). I'm interested in working with you there, and on a separate SW-CMM vs. CMMI entry. --Xsmith 04:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Integrated banner for WikiProject Computer science[edit]

I have made a proposal for a integrated banner for the project here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks -- Tinu Cherian - 14:00, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Minor barnstar
	Good Work Sir..!! Coolsazal (talk) 09:48, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest[edit]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

High-level emulation article to Draft[edit]

I've moved High-level emulation over to Draft:High-level emulation so you can work on developing that concept there. In the meantime, it will be at a redirect to UltraHLE. Hope that's alright with you. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 19:37, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]