User talk:PpPachy

Hallo, PpPachy. Welcome to Wikipedia!

I've seen you've put a gorgeous picture of the AMR 33 on WikiCommons. It will be put to good use on the other language wiki's. Needless to say, any other pictures of French AFV's would be much appreciated!

Greetings, --MWAK 07:05, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I have a few more, will add as time permits. -- PpPachy 20:34, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm looking forward to them! :o) --MWAK 06:30, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

French a/c

Nice to meet another person who takes interest in odd French aircraft. :) - Emt147 ^Burninate! 18:36, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello :) I wanted to write the article on the LeO, but was too lazy to actually start doing it. Thanks for starting it, I'll try to add a few relevant points to it. PpPachy 21:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Battle of Mers-el-Kébir

Back in January you asked about British air losses - if you include the shadowing of the Strasborg and attack on the Dunkirque on the night of the 5th and 6th I believe there were 6 in total, (3 Blackburn Skua and 3 Fairey Swordfish). Two Skua crew seem to have been shot down and killed at Mers-el-Kébir istelf, during a dogfight over the mine laying Swordfish on the 3rd, and I suspect it is this aircraft you have heard about. All other lost aircraft seem to have made it close enough to British ships to be rescued.

Always good to have another aircraft nut, and someone to provide a non-English speaking nations perspective :-). Winstonwolfe 07:00, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. PpPachy 20:46, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello PgPachy, just thought I'd drop in and thank you for your comments on the article. -- ZScarpia (talk) 09:33, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

LeO.451 designer

Hello. Designer entry is left for those who built aircraft themself. In most cases is filled in aircraft built in early period of aviation history or in ultralight planes. Aircraft from factories are not designed / built by one person but by whole teams. If you want to write about Pierre Mercier, write few words in "Design and development" section or write separate article. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 12:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Pierre Mercier has his own entry already, albeit minimal, but I do not see a point in having the "designer" line in the template when so few aircraft will have it filled, according to your criteria. PpPachy 12:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I didn't developed those criteria, it's official guideline of WikiProject Aircraft. On this page you may find clear description:

designer = <!--only appropriate for single designers, not project leaders-->

— Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/FAQ

If you don't like it, talk about it on project's talk page and put some arguments why project leaders should be named designers of particular aircraft. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 13:08, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the explanation, I have to admit I did not read whole template documentation. PpPachy 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Potez 650

Good job on adding Wikilinks to the Potez article. Congrats and keep up the good work!!!!! Raymondwinn (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Caudron, Insignia

thanks PpPachy, I didn't know that about the Finnish markings. I thought this machine was a captured example and painted in Luftwaffe markings. I was suspicious at first before I was to make the change but now am glad to know this. Thanks. Koplimek (talk) 15:57, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello PpPachy! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 938 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Marcel Riffard - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Pierre Mercier (engineer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pierre Mercier (engineer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pierre Mercier (engineer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

wizzito | say hello! 22:59, 5 December 2021 (UTC)