User talk:Poulsen

• /Archive1: November 2005 - February 2006
• /Archive2: March 2006 - August 2006
• /Archive3: September 2006 - May 2007
• /Archive4: June 2007 - July 2009

Roger Helland

Hi Poulsen. I just created this article. I haven't found much about his short time in Brøndby though. Could you help with the stats and a ref? Rettetast (talk) 01:21, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Great work. I have credited you at WT:DYK. Rettetast (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

There is a question about B.T. at Template talk:Did you know#Roger Helland. Rettetast (talk) 15:20, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Roger Helland

On December 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Roger Helland, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Plunder Island.JPG

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Plunder Island.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:29, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your BLP sourcing work

Hi Poulsen. Your work on sourcing BLPs is greatly appreciated. Please note that much of the BLP-unref tagging is done by dumb bots that check for inline cite tags like <ref></ref> and a <references/> section. If you place your sources in the "External links" section, the bots may not identify the source and likely re-tag it as unreferenced. I have modified some of your sources accordingly. Thanks again. Power.corrupts (talk) 15:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

And thanks for finishing my sentence at Keld Andersen - I suddenly had to run. Power.corrupts (talk) 17:44, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Wondered if you could clean up June 2009, I have marked the ones missing (mainly sports) [1] hilsen Power.corrupts (talk) 09:44, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Oscar Jørgensen

A tag has been placed on Oscar Jørgensen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. PhGustaf (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Roel Dieltiens

I have removed the reference in the above article, and reinserted the BLPunreferenced tag.

[www.cellist.nl www.cellist.nl] is not a reliable source of information - anyone can register and add information. There is no checking of the details - I think they only check it if someone contacts them and says "this entry is wrong".

I did look for references for Dieltiens, but all the mentions which I could find were very minor ones ("This work was performed by Roel Dieltiens....." kind of thing), and nothing significant about him.

I am going to PROD it, as I couldn't find reliable sources, but I thought I'd let you know why I removed the reference.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 16:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

The Musketeers (film)

Hi - thanks for expanding the above article. I've moved the page back to the English title, per Wikipedia Use English and Naming conventions (films). Any questions, please get back to me, or via the film project talkpage. Thanks again! Lugnuts (talk) 12:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Autreviewer

Hi Poulsen,I just saw one of your articles at newpage patrol and was surprised to see that someone who has been editing here for as long as you wasn't an wp:Autoreviewer. So I've taken the liberty of fixing that. Take care and happy editing. ϢereSpielChequers 15:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

John Lauridsen

Hi there POULSEN, VASCO from Portugal here,

(by the way, i loved Flemming Povlsen as a player - from what i read in NATIONAL-FOOTBALL-TEAMS.com, he still returned as an amateur player in Denmark in the late 1990's/2000's after he retired in Germany with those serious injuries - but i see you are more of a Christian Poulsen-man! Good player too, with a different approach, although Povlsen was a hard-worker too) Regarding your message and work on Lauridsen:

I apologize if i created any incovenience(s) with my edits, was only trying to help. In no way was i trying to diminish the player's career with the national team. It's just that as storyline reads - don't know if you wrote it - he was fourth of fifth-choice in the squad, with several other players in front of him.

I admit i haven't spent much time reading WP:LEAD, but i always thought the intro should be as summarized as possible, with the most important aspects of his career. I remember reading once one review on Daniel Güiza which had almost as many lines in intro than in body of article, that is incoherent to say the least. All this said, don't worry, i won't revert the stuff at Lauridsen's anymore. You can also have a look at my work in Michael Manniche, and see what changes are "appliable".

Maybe we can work together as a team, sorry for any incovenience on my part, have a nice weekend, VASCO - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 13:14, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Denmark national football team games – 1970s

The article Denmark national football team games – 1970s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a sports almanac.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 16:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Denmark national football team games – 1980s

The article Denmark national football team games – 1980s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a sports almanac.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Denmark national football team games – 2000s

The article Denmark national football team games – 2000s has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a sports almanac.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stifle (talk) 16:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Baldur's Gate characters

I'm wondering if characters like Adalon, Belhifet, and Bodhi are better merged into List of Baldur's Gate characters? Alaundo exists in the tabletop RPG as well, so I think he is fine in main FR characters list. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 17:19, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I do think that including characters that have only appeared in computer games in that list only is the most appropriate thing (crossover characters are another story), so what do you recommend on a sort of heading to be used? 24.148.0.83 (talk) 18:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

That looks like a good layout. The PCs should get top billing, but there are other memorable characters in the game that deserve some mention. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 22:23, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

I rewrote the lead a bit, and put in an extra header level on the characters that were there, since I am assuming they were potential PCs in the game. I haven't played any of the BG games myself, so please do go back over anything I did and make sure it is accurate - sorry. :) I will move Adalon and Bodhi to this article, and I will look to see if there is anything else that should be moved/merged there. 24.148.0.83 (talk) 17:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Christiansen - Reply

Hi there POULSEN, VASCO here,

again, i am sorry if i offended you or caused incovenience, anger management problems (and i am being 100% honest with you, not being sarcastic at all). One great thing in Thomas Christiansen's page you did - and i accused you of doing the opposite - was removing the birthplace from INTRO and relocate it to body of article, my sincere apologies.

Now, for more "details of defense" (and you are right, it's always best to start with a talkpage discussion, instead of summary "rubbish"): i have always seen the word "football" in the player's articles, it was the first time i saw it as "association football", honestly. I don't think the "football player" is very accurate, because it gets repetitive "...is a football player who plays for..."

The INTRO changes were due to the fact that i don't see ANY sense in repeating words/sentences which also appear in storyline, the introduction has to be much much more "elusive" if you will.

In conclusion, no, i don't think i own WP, nor do i create any set of rules for others to follow, but i do admit that my summaries sometimes do suggest that.

Happy 2010 World Cup, happy editing, sorry again. Oh, and do you know if the great Søren Busk is related to the player (also defender) now called-up? Cheers, keep up the great work, from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 14:46, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

• Sincerely hope you are not angry with me, although i can't do much about it if you choose to be so: i apologized for my manners and WP approach, then tried to discuss some "wikitactics" (footballer vs. football player), asked you a friendly question and...nothing! I think we strive towards the same goal (each one of us with different tactics, i REALLY wished i could be a little more calm and patient), and as long as serious limits are not crossed, all can be talked and arranged. Cheers - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

• No man, i wouldn't say "rude", AT ALL. But i was a bit concerned you were a bit angry with me...Hey, i think sometimes i deserve it :) - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 09:02, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 23:15, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Koman Coulibaly

I know you're doing your best to be careful,

But your removal of the reference to the Facebook page did not rely on a link to a non notable facebook page, but to the Reuters article that mentions this as one of two previous controversial incidents involving this referee. T L Miles (talk)

Your summary reads: (→Early career: remove nonnotable facebook group - Monday article doesn't mention all its hate pages.. move refs around to properly cover the "disputed" claim). The point being a Facebook group is not notable as a topic (for its own article), nor is it an acceptable source for a reference. But you appear to have misunderstood this by removing talk in a Reuters article (a valid ref source) reporting on a Facebook group. Notability guidelines, per Wikipedia:Notability "On Wikipedia, notability determines whether a topic merits its own article. " and so isn't relevant here. I'm going to restore the mention of the Facebook group begun after a Tunisian match he officiated calling for his removal by FIFA unless you have some other concern with this. I'll hold off until tomorrow in case you'd like to take this to arbitration first. Thanks! T L Miles (talk) 21:52, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Mário João

Hello! Do you know the full name of this Portuguese football player? Many sources adfirm Mário Rodrigues João, while other ones state only Mário João. If you know something more, plese, write me here. --VAN ZANT (talk) 10:24, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mikkel Lentz

The article Mikkel Lentz has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. | Uncle Milty | talk | 21:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mikkel Lentz

The article Mikkel Lentz has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. | Uncle Milty | talk | 10:44, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Hansen (footballer born 1924), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Erik Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Viggo Jensen (footballer born 1921), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Full back, Half back and Poul Petersen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

List of Demon Stone characters listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Demon Stone characters. Since you had some involvement with the List of Demon Stone characters redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). —Torchiest ^talk_edits 22:06, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pauli Jørgensen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:24, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Eyolf Kleven (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Forward and Half-back

Axel Pilmark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Half-back

Eigil Nielsen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Hansen

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 4 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Østerbros Boldklub, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Common and Carl Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:47, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Tnx for your help with the "decategorization" of Danish athletes, I wanna tell you that for the category that start with same letter of the alphabetic order, sorting it's not necessary. It's not necessary to put "Danish" after "Category:Discus throwers" for example, because also without the sorting is OK. You can tray ;)

Kasper2006 (talk) 08:24, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

You should add interwikis in new categories ;) 89.70.182.42 (talk) 03:48, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Athletics (sport) and Paralympic athletics

• Category:Competitors in athletics and Category:Paralympic athletes (track and field) (that is inside of Category:Competitors in athletics by competition)
• Category:Athletes by nationality and Category:Paralympic athletes (track and field) by country
• Category:Long-distance runners (or others kind of runners) and Category:Wheelchair racers

How you can see are different categories. For example the paralympic japanese athlete Kazu Hatanaka must to be into Category:Japanese wheelchair racers not into Category:Japanese long-distance runners. It follows that the categories of Athletics must be removed by Paralympic athletes. If you want to enter the category of specialty must do so correctly (as in the example I mentioned). --Kasper2006 (talk) 03:53, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Global account

Hi Poulsen! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 21:19, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Gond (Forgotten Realms) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gond (Forgotten Realms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gond (Forgotten Realms) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 21:16, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KFUMs Boldklub

The article KFUMs Boldklub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable organization.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 16:26, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

EB1911 attribution

If you make an edit like this one. Do not remove the attribution (see WP:FREECOPYING) instead use the {{EB1911}} template with parameters (like this). -- PBS (talk) 14:49, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Poulsen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Umberlee for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umberlee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umberlee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:18, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Mielikki (Forgotten Realms) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mielikki (Forgotten Realms) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mielikki (Forgotten Realms) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

"Chultan Peninsula" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Chultan Peninsula. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 21#Chultan Peninsula until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Jontesta (talk) 18:09, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

"The Zhentarim" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect The Zhentarim has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 25 § The Zhentarim until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Royal League seasons

Template:Royal League seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Joseph2302 (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Tinkoff (cycling team)

Tinkoff (cycling team) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 04:01, 28 October 2023 (UTC)