User talk:Petje2000
| This is Petje2000's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Hello, Petje2000, and Welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking 
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 12:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Getting started
- Introduction
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
- Frequently asked questions
- Cheatsheet
- Our help forum for new editors, the Teahouse
- The Help Desk, for more advanced questions
- Help pages
- Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Your submission at Articles for creation: Space Fata Morgana (April 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Space Fata Morgana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi @Chaotic Enby thank you for your review of my article.
- Your comment was: "no secondary sourcing". The reason for this is, that this is a brand new hypothesis that has just been published.
- So there is no other sourcing. What steps could one take in a situation like this? Since this new hypothesis seems to answer questions that were raised by the latest observations of the James Webb Space Telescope, I would like to get it on Wikipedia as soon as possible. Petje2000 (talk) 15:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! Unfortunately, that's the thing — if the hypothesis has just been published, but there wasn't discussion about it yet, it's a bit too early to publish it on Wikipedia. It's best to wait for other researchers and/or scientific media to discuss it before having it here. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 18:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Hello, Petje2000!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Space Fata Morgana (April 13)[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Space Fata Morgana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi @KylieTastic thank you for your review of my article.
- You commented that more sourcing was needed. However, this is a brand new hypothesis that has just been published. So there is no other sourcing is available yet, except for the book I mentioned. What steps could one take in a situation like this?
- Since this new hypothesis seems to answer questions that were raised by the latest observations of the James Webb Space Telescope, I would like to get it on Wikipedia as soon as possible, if possible. Petje2000 (talk) 15:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of already 'notable' subjects as defined by Wikipedia:Notability, it is not a place to publish new ideas. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 17:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)