User talk:Peter10003

Hello, Peter10003! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Stardust8212 17:12, 4 May 2008 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Daily Mail as source

Hi, Peter10003. Some time ago, a consensus was reached on Wikipedia that the Daily Mail is not a sufficiently reliable source for Wikipedia articles. If better sources can be found for the same material, please use those instead. Haploidavey (talk) 13:25, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

I should add that well-sourced conjecture (scientific or otherwise) is best dealt with in the article body -- indeed, all information in the introduction should summarise well sourced sections in the article body. The lead should, in turn, reflect the article content in due proportion. Please also read Wikipedia's standard recommendations for citing sources; we don't create direct weblinks from article text to external websitesb or sources. Haploidavey (talk) 13:41, 21 November 2017 (UTC)