User talk:Persephone19
Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]
|
Implicate order in Quantum Mind[edit]
You addition of material on Bohm and co is welcome, but I cannot see why you have started a completely new section. doesn't it belong under "Examples" ? 1Z 11:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Quantum mind sources[edit]
Hi! I've fixed up the citations list on Quantum mind to use the ref tags. Please read Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to use the citations system built in to wikipedia. You should never be manually numbering citations. fraggle (talk) 21:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
personal address[edit]
Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you.02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
personal address[edit]
Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you. 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)~
personal address[edit]
Hi. I see you are interested in uncommon research fields. I would like to hear a little about your background, and maybe share my thoughts on the subjects and it's ramification. thank you. --Procrastinating@talk2me 02:09, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
- Hallo. Sorry to be so long in replying. I haven't had time to look at Wikepedia much lately, however I was back today to try to do some editing on the Orch OR article, where there is felt to be a problem with accessibility for the general reader. As to my background, I would say I was an independent researcher, which means basically just interested in the subject of consciousness and particularly quantum consciousness as developed by people such as Penrose/Hameroff, Bernroider and David Bohm. I don't have a physics or neuroscience background, but I have spent the last 20 or so years privately studying relevant areas. I was many years in the financial sector. Not a helpful background, although it does provide some insight into the way that authoritative nonsense can drown out any attempt at rational discussion or evidence. My website is www.quantum-mind.co.uk. This is not original stuff, but tries to give some general account plus summaries/reviews of a range of articles and books on the subject and a reference list. Persephone19 (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Dear Persephone, could you send me your e-mail in order not to pollute Wikipedia pages with our discussion. Is your email the one provided at the bottom of this page Quantum Mind.uk? For example on the page provided is written "Studies (3. & 4.) showed that tubulin tails interacted directly with synaptotagmin-1, a protein that offsets the otherwise destabilising influence of Ca2+ ions at axon terminals". This is not correct claim. Neuroscience is not difficult, just those who do neuroscience know many facts, a lot of terminology and can see small details to be critical. For example, Ca2+ is not destabilizing in presynaptic terminals, all these proteins are Ca2+ stable, because for every synaptic vesicle release the presynaptic Ca2+ must raise to very high concentrations. However in other places in the neuron not the presynaptic end, the Ca2+ concentrations are much much lower down to nanoM. Since it is known that Ca2+ destructs microtubules the question is - is it possible to have microtubules in the presynaptic space, where the Ca2+ should have depolimerizing action upon MT? And experimental studies showed that synaptotagmin, which is the Ca2+ sensor in exocytosis [1] might bind to microtubules and [2] might stabilize them against the depolymerizing action of high Ca2+. Also anatomical evidence has been found that microtubules can run into the active zone, so I come up with the idea of microtubules controling exocytosis around 2003-2004. This is just hypothesis, and might actually need adaptor proteins like ELKS2/CAST to be interposed between the microtubule and the synaptic vesicle. Danko Georgiev MD (talk) 02:22, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
I have just posted some comment here(!) on Hameroff's video response. I did not have time to comment on all wrong things he said, but picked up something apparently wrong about the molecular biology of microtubules and microtubule-associated proteins. Danko Georgiev (talk) 08:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Persephone19, I did some clean-up of the quantum mind article. You can check how it looks after using the citation templates. Also I proposed deletion of copy-pasted citations, which serve no purpose - Talk:Quantum_mind#How_citations_help_justify_the_speculations_by_Bernroider_or_Hameroff.3F Danko Georgiev (talk) 17:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)