User talk:Peaches1955

Welcome!

Hello, Peaches1955, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lectonar (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Peaches1955! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 942 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Bob Hay - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Michael Lachowski - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 10:48, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of FFFM[edit]

The article FFFM has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 21:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of FFFM[edit]

A tag has been placed on FFFM requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. R12056 (talk) 00:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Squalls (band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Squalls (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 16:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Squalls (band)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Squalls (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫T 16:47, 1 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 10[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Supercluster (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Pylon

Vanessa Briscoe Hay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Rock

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Supercluster photo jpg.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Supercluster photo jpg.jpg, which you've sourced to Michael Lachowski. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:11, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Maxwell's (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Perfect Sound Forever

Pylon (band) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Perfect Sound Forever

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Peaches1955. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pylon Reenactment Society (band) (March 11)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not satisfying our standards and there's no inherited notability from others.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pylon Reenactment Society (band) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:32, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Pylon Reenactment Society (band) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Pylon Reenactment Society (band), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 21:07, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pylon Reenactment Society (band)[edit]

Hello, Peaches1955. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Pylon Reenactment Society".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. G13 account of Linguist111 (talk) 19:19, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Peaches1955. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pylon Reenactment Society (band)[edit]

Hello Peaches1955,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pylon Reenactment Society (band) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:48, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback[edit]

Hello. You have a new message at Kudpung's talk page. 03:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Peaches1955. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. If you continue to create inappropriate articles, your account will be blocked. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 03:40, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pylon Reenactment Society (band)[edit]

I am sure I am not the only person who has written an article about their project. I am just being honest about it and not hiding behind a fake name/email. I am a true independent artist and not affliated with a major label. The people who are interested in my music understand that there is an element.of self promotion that goes on. I have always attempted to be honest and not overblown.. If you want to go through with your threat to block me for COI. Go ahead. Be sure to include my comments here to your committee. Again, I formally request that you send my submission to someone who has an interest in music, especially that of an independent variety.

Best wishes, Vanessa Briscoe Hay Vanessa Briscoe Hay Peaches1955 (talk) 03:58, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Peaches1955. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not here for you to advertise[edit]

I noticed you crying about being blocked. You are a CoI editor, Vanessa Briscoe Hay, using Wikipedia to push your business because you think practices common to your trade are allowed here. Please leave Wikipedia if you're just using us to push your music career. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:26, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nope - crying is not the appropriate terminology. Upset, and stunned are closer to my feelings.

This missive from you seems quite personal in the phrases you are choosing to use.

What practices are common to my trade? I have no clue as to what you are referring to?

I am an indie woman musician with a career of over 41 years. I did not submit the first article on here about my band Pylon and do not add to that page.

I did submit my original posting about myself and other members of my band in the interest of having accurate information out there for researchers.

Most recently, I was interviewed by the author Elizabeth Grace Hale’s well researched book - “Cool Town.” I came here to add a citation to the book and found that I have been blocked.

If this is a personal vendetta on your part, I sincerely do not appreciate it. But, life is not fair. If Wikipedia chooses to remove my page. I’d like to have it submitted to an oversight committee rather than a committee of one, such as yourself. Peaches1955 (talk) 16:44, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a COI[edit]

I happened to stumble across this and wanted to give a bit of explanation here as to why you were blocked, what a conflict of interest means, and so on. First, an explanation of what a conflict of interest (COI) means and why it's important:

A COI occurs when someone edits a page that is about or relates to them in some form or fashion. For example, it would be a conflict of interest if you were to edit your own page or a page about your bands, co-workers, friends, labels - pretty much any person, group, or company that you have had a relationship of some type with. It would also be a conflict of interest if you were to edit a general page to insert information about yourself, like for example editing the page on rock music to insert mention of your band.

The reason why it's not a good idea to edit with a conflict of interest is because it's very, very easy to take things personally and to even write with a favorable, promotional tone, even if this wasn't your intention. People are normally used to writing in a casual, reflective style that includes their own observations and opinions, which clashes with Wikipedia's writing style. Adding in a conflict of interest can make the process of trying to write neutrally even more difficult. Wikipedia heavily recommends that people who have a conflict of interest not edit their page directly because of this and instead recommends that they post suggestions to the article's talk page or to the talk page of an applicable WikiProject. So if you are wanting someone to add to an article about a rock band, you could post the request to the talk page for the WikiProject devoted to rock music or the general music WikiProject.

Offhand I don't see where you were posting outright promotional content along the lines of "buy the album... in stores NOW" type of material, however it can be seen as promotional to write about yourself. Part of this is because there has a history of people coming to Wikipedia to do just that, sometimes even paying people to create the material. (This is a big reason as to why any COIs must be stated upfront, to maintain transparency.) It also was concerning that you were predominantly only editing content that related to you.

I do see where you were trying to create pages live and then later through the Articles for Creation process (AfC). Using AfC is good and definitely the best avenue for this, as it will get reviewed by a random editor. Creating them live isn't as recommended since this does still have the COI issue and you're expected to establish right away how the given topic is notable. Keep in mind that this can only be done by showing where the topic has received coverage in independent and reliable sources such as coverage in newspapers or other popular media sources. For bands, reviews in places like Pitchfork can count towards notability as well. It can honestly be kind of difficult sometimes to establish this even for seemingly notable topics, as it can take time to compile all of the needed sourcing. It's why making a draft and putting it through AfC can be such a good avenue in general.

I know that this is a little late, but I think it would be good to take some of the training guides or tours about editing and Wikipedia in general. It can help show good faith on your part and also help fill in some of the questions. I would also heavily recommend utilizing the Teahouse as well - it's a resource for editors with questions. Some of the trainings you can take include WP:ADVENTURE and Wikipedia:Training. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:08, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ReaderofthePack Thanks so much. I appreciate your kindness in pointing me to the articles you list. I am not sure when I will have time to work on this. I am blocked anyway- But,I will. Best wishes. Stay well. Peaches1955