User talk:Parthian Scribe

Parthian Scribe is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Wikipedia on a future date

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Parthian Scribe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Wikiacc (¶) 17:41, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was nice.--Parthian Scribe (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback![edit]

Hello, Parthian Scribe. You have new messages at WP:TW.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 15:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I did.--Parthian Scribe 06:08, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied to your message[edit]

Just wanted to let you know I replied to your message at Talk:Edgar Allan Poe in popular culture. I hope you'll reconsider your addition of the reference to Zelda based on the information I've provided. --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:58, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, you made a very good point, I guess I'll change it.--Parthian Scribe (talk) 23:27, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Converts from Judaism[edit]

Hey there, I see you're pretty new to this, so I won't be mean. :) When you take a category to CFD for deletion or renaming, you also have to "tag" the category page. In this case, you need to post the renaming template, using {{subst:cfr|proposed name}}. Also, in the future, be careful to use the right heading when you set up the discussion section on the CFD page -- for some reason, you "re-used" the heading from the section right below yours. Not to worry, I've already taken care of that, so all you have to do is post that renaming template. Regards, Cgingold (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks --Parthian Scribe (talk) 06:03, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Scarlett Johansson[edit]

Is there a source that she is a Christian? The below interview doesn't say that, celebrating "little bit of both" (the line you quoted) doesn't necessarily make somebody a Christian:

http://www.bangitout.com/reviews112.html

"Q: I read that your mother is Jewish and your father is Danish?

A: Yes.

Q: With the holiday season coming up, how do you plan on celebrating?

A: I'm just going to be with my family.

Q: But what do you celebrate, more Christmas or more Chanukah?

A: A little of both."

All Hallow's Wraith (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was just looking at the page. Sorry about that.--Parthian Scribe 22:43, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGill Street[edit]

The link from the disambiguation page McGill Street to McGill Street (Vancouver) is now blue. You may want to revisit Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGill Street. -- Eastmain (talk) 16:55, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing that there is some use to the page now, I withdrew the AFD nomination.--Parthian Scribe 20:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request[edit]

Hello Parthian Scribe, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback should be used to revert vandalism, and that misuse of the tool, either by reverting good-faith edits or reverting-warring with other users, can lead to its removal. For practice, you may wish to review Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback. Good luck. Acalamari 22:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the very quick response!--Parthian Scribe 22:01, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! Acalamari 22:02, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh it's fine...[edit]

Happened to me this morning, it's all good Wysprgr2005 (talk) 23:38, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Magdalena de Kino has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:24, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, you left a warning on my talk page for a perfectly legitimate edit I made [1]. What I was doing was changing a hyphen to a dash (read over WP:DASH) along with some automatic fixes the AutoWiki Browser threw in. There is no reason the edit should have been reverted, and certainly no reason I should have received a vandalism warning on my talk page. Can you please review your edits ([2], and [3]), and then decide whether or not they were necessary? Thank you.--Parthian Scribe 02:37, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry[edit]

Been really hectic, Huggle has it's issues. Not sure how to unwarn you... Wysprgr2005 (talk) 02:43, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, if you want to unwarn me, you can just remove the section or undo your revision (I think), but it's not necessary. Have a nice day :) Parthian Scribe 02:53, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Barack Obama, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:44, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you may have a misunderstanding, Obama's father was Kenyan; which is not the same thing as an "African-American" (who are descended primarily from West Africa. Even if the edit I made was false, it certainly did not deserve a warning message, especially one with no explanation of what I did that was wrong. For future reference, the edit I made was [4].--Parthian Scribe 05:58, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for vandalism of Wikipedia[edit]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 05:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request for unjust block[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

False positive. The article was being vandalized massively during these hours after the elections results and you got caught in the cross fire. Unblocked. My apologies.

Request handled by: ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:57, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to note that I was only warned once by "Jossi", and it was for [5]. I was immediately blocked for reverting his edit [6]; giving an explanation on my talk page. This user was very unclear about why he warned and blocked me, he never spoke to me directly which I found offensive, and he was too quick to block; I never "vandalized" Wikipedia, and the edit I made was (I believe) constructive to Wikipedia. Rather than posting a message on my talk page so we could settle our minor disagreement, he just blocked me. I felt violated.--Parthian Scribe 06:34, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am reviewing your block now - at a glance, the block does seem somewhat harsh to me; however, I am removing your access to the rollback tool. That tool is intended for blatant vandalism only, and cannot be used for edit warring. Once your block is lifted or expires, you may request re-granting of this tool after some time to me directly or at WP:RFPERM. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 06:23, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking my request into consideration. Sorry about the rollback thing though, I just used it to revert one edit because it was quicker than pressing the undo button; I assure you, I will not make this mistake again in the future. Parthian Scribe 06:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I also would say that from the surface, blocking you was rather petty and childish. Revoking rollback? OK. Blocking you? no. I don't know if there is something I'm missing, but it seems to me that Jossi's block was merely an "I'll show you" because you reverted him. I'll ask him what is going on. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 17:42, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the unblock Jossi, I realize it must have been very difficult to patrol that article at such a restless time. I also apologize for going a bit over the top with a lot of the things I said my unblock request, I shouldn't have been so enraged for something that was simply a mistake. Again, thanks for the unblock, but my block log shows me as being unblocked, yet somehow I am still unable to edit. I get a message saying "Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Parthian Scribe". The reason given for Parthian Scribe's block is: "Vandalism".". I am puzzled as to why I am still getting this message because both my account and my IP address are "unblocked" according to the block log. Does anyone know why this is so? Thanks. Parthian Scribe 00:22, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like the autoblock was not removed when you were unblocked, as it is still visible in Special:IPBlockList. I assume the message MediaWiki:Autoblockedtext (or something similar) shows when you try to edit; the instructions are in the "rectifying an autoblock" section (which you may need to click "show" on). —Snigbrook 00:41, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information, Snigbrook, I'm going to place the request on my page.--Parthian Scribe 01:03, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|75.164.111.197|Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Parthian Scribe". The reason given for Parthian Scribe's block is: "Vandalism", even though the block has since been lifted (see talk page).|Jossi|4=1201990}}

Unblocked. east718 // talk // email // 01:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to Template:Arabs[edit]

I don't need luck finding them, I've seen plenty of such studies. Even Jews have been shown to be closer related to Kurds, who are Iranian speakers, than to Arabs, so there you have it. Linguistics don't mean much when it comes to genetics. Here's some stuff I don't know if you can access: [7][8] and a map by Cavalli Sforza: [9] FunkMonk (talk) 17:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find when where exactly it said Kurds are more closely related to Arabs (but then again, I only skimmed over the second link). I think at this point you should start a discussion about this on the talk page of Arabs or Template:Arabs to see if a larger consensus could be reached. Parthian Scribe 22:48, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Rollback[edit]

No. It's good to see that the block was, after all, a mistake, however that doesn't change the fact that you misused rollback. When you accepted the tool the first time, you made the same promise (or at least accepted those conditions of its use). When I said you could re-request the tool, I meant after a few weeks, (hence "after some time" in my original post). You are welcome to request it at WP:RFPERM if you're not satisfied with this, but I will be happy to take another look at this after a couple weeks if you don't mind waiting that long. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 20:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oops, I must have missed the "after some time" part, sorry about that. However, after reading Help:Reverting#Rollback it says it's polite to leave an explanation on the article talk page or on the talk page of the user whose edit(s) you reverted. While I did not leave a comment on the other user's talk page or the article's talk page, I did leave an explanation to the revert on my own talkpage--where the other user had commented; since that's where the discussion previously existed. Also access to rollback rights for me was removed because of "edit warring with rollback"[10] however, WP:EDITWAR describes edit warring as "when individual editors or groups of editors repeatedly revert each other's edits"; I only reverted one edit, I'm not sure whether or not you saw that since the Obama article was flooded with edits at that time. But, I don't mind waiting another couple of weeks to get back rollback--it's not that big of a deal. Thanks. Parthian Scribe 22:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ACC[edit]

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 22:27, 10 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Persian people[edit]

Dear Parthian Scribe, Persian people article is general. As you know persons like Rumi, Khwarezmi and ... didn't live in present bounderies of Iran, but they were called "Persian". Also "Persian" in English mostly means "Iranian" and not exclusively a "Persian-speaker", and Persian-speakers of Iran don't call themselves "Parsi". In other words the present "Persian people" article is not about a special ethnic group. I humbly think that you should improve the infobox on Persian-speakers of Iran for Iranian nationals who speak Persian whether inside or outside Iran. These matters has been discussed previously in Talk:Persian_people. Please if you have a counter argument, discuss it there.--Raayen (talk) 03:38, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I didn't realize there was previously a discussion about this topic. I apologize. Parthian Scribe 04:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Lebanese Navy SEALs Regiment[edit]

On 13 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lebanese Navy SEALs Regiment, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 01:00, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sneath Glass Company[edit]

Dear Parthian Scribe, I'm working on the 90%. I got it from a booklet called "The Glass Business and the Crimmels" by Clyde Crimmel II, on page 5. However, I have asked my source (a 75-year-old) for more proof. His reply so far is that Sneath has about 30 patents relating to kitchen and refrigerator ware. Here are the first two he listed: 1. Patent # 1,915,647 dated June 27, 1933, for the defroster tray that fit under the ice cube trays for defrosting the refrigerator 2. Patent # 1,915,849 dated June 27, 1933 - for refrigerator product. He has also mentioned Mildred & Ralph Lechner as author/sources, but I am not sure if this relates to the 90%, and I do not have any of their books. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TwoScars (talk • contribs) 20:42, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I went ahead and added the source to the article, and updated the Did you Know request. --Parthian Scribe 01:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Mysql-screenshot.PNG[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Mysql-screenshot.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fastily (talk) 03:06, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was just looking at the image, and it appears that the program is licensed under the GPL license; not fair use like I marked it. I'm going to change the the tags now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Parthian Scribe 03:28, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Sneath Glass Company[edit]

On 17 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sneath Glass Company, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback Request[edit]

Now that I'm not getting edit conflicts out the wazoo.... As I'm pretty sure I already explained, rollback is intended for use with blatant vandalism only. The edits which led me to remove the tool from you could only be described as a content dispute. Even if leaving a note, it is inappropriate to use rollback, as that does not allow you to enter an edit summary for the benefit of other editors. It also marks the edit as minor, which if you're not reverting vandalism, it probably isn't. Edit conflicts are not a problem, as the undo button will often work for older revisions. If you get such a conflict, go back to the history and try again.

Anyway, in looking over your edits since the last request less than two weeks ago, I don't see any evidence of edit warring, but nor do I see much evidence of anti-vandalism work. I'll go ahead and give you the tool, since Huggle is good about finding only blatant stuff, but do use caution whenever using the tool manually. If you're not sure, use the undo button so you can leave a note. If you have further questions, do let me know. Happy editing. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 17:01, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks[edit]

		The RfA Barnstar
		Parthian Scribe, I would like to thank you for your participation in my recent Request for Adminship, which passed with 112 supports, 4 opposes and 5 neutrals. A special mention goes out to Stwalkerster and Pedro for nominating me, thanks a lot for having trust in me! In response to the neutrals, I will try to double check articles that have been tagged for speedy deletion before I CSD them and will start off slowly with the drama boards of ANI and AN to ensure that I get used to them. In response to the oppose !votes on my RfA, I will check that any images I use meet the non-free content criteria and will attempt to handle any disputes or queries as well as I can. If you need my help at all, feel free to simply ask at my talk page and I'll see if I can help. Once again, thank you for your participation, and have a great day! :) The Helpful One 22:22, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

design by neurolysis | to add this barnstar to your awards page, simply copy and paste {{subst:User:Neurolysis/THOBS}} and remove this bottom text | if you don't like thankspam, please accept my sincere apologies

Adherents of Judaism category[edit]

Hi, please take a look at the comments I left here regarding my suggested deletion of this category. Your effort is commendable, but I think the category should be deleted. shirulashem (talk) 17:13, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, for the notification. Parthian Scribe 23:32, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kim Kardiashian and Ana Kasparian[edit]

In order for there to be a feud Kardishian would have had to respond in some way. I care because the information is inaccurate. Go to youtube and type in "The Kim Kardashian vs. Ana Kasparian Feud rages on" and you will see an excerpt from the young turks show where kasparian disputes the idea that theres a feud. She made fun of her a lot on the show and some writer decided to write that up as feud. Unless you find some source where Kardashian responds directly to Kasparian than this claim has no evidence to back it up. annoynmous 11:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh sorry, I didn't realize the whole situation. Parthian Scribe 07:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

section on Baha'i Faith at Religion in Pakistan[edit]

I've just completed a whole article on the Baha'i Faith in Pakistan, it has been my practice to include more or less the header section as a section/main article link in the "Religion in " article. I see you and another have built up a section there and would like to consult on the approach. For a broader review of my work see Category:Bahá'í Faith by country For an example of what I normally do see Bahá'í Faith in Azerbaijan and Religion in Azerbaijan. Smkolins (talk) 10:26, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject TRANSWIKI[edit]

You are invited to join WikiProject TRANSWIKI and join the Persian language transwiki project. The aim is to draw up a full directory of missing articles from Persian wikipedia and build a team of translators to work at bridging the gaps in knowledge and to improve existing articles by translation and finding reliable sources to back up information. We need your help, so please join up as your language skills are crucial to improving coverage of Iran on wikipedia in depth. Dr. Blofeld ^{White cat} 11:53, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment[edit]

Please comment here. MisterE2123Five3 (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference[edit]

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being minor in the usual way.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. With the script in place, you can continue with this functionality indefinitely (its use is governed by WP:MINOR). If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:14, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:IAmericanreligions.png listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IAmericanreligions.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 12:09, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Parthian Scribe. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed[edit]

Hello Parthian Scribe! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 20:45, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Parthian Scribe. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]