User talk:P199/Archive 5

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Signpost: 1 January 2023[edit]

Kapas Island[edit]

hi there, why did you delete the photos i uploaded ? did they violate any rules ? wish to know to avoid similar happening in future, thanks WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:32, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker: yes, see WP:IG, which says: "Articles consisting entirely or primarily of galleries are discouraged, as the Commons is intended for such collections of images." Moreover it was self-serving, only adding all your own images. -- P 1 9 9   16:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
i thought i was only allowed to add my own images due to copy right ? WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 08:08, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker: that applies to uploading images. -- P 1 9 9   13:10, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks for the clarification WorldTravleerAndPhotoTaker (talk) 13:17, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – January 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).

Administrator changes

added
readded Stephen
removed

Interface administrator changes

removed Nihiltres

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
  • Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 January 2023[edit]

Sorry, but ...[edit]

I just found that Madridejos, Cebu, its wikidata has no finance numbers in it. And I can't work out where to find them - not in PSGC (and there is no webpage either). Have you got any idea how to find it? Auntie Kathleen (talk) 15:06, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntie Kathleen: No, sorry, I don't know. BTW, all the PH articles are standardized, so please don't change formatting! In particular, reducing text size is contrary to MOS:FONTSIZE, and you are also removing valid "access-date" parameters in the weather box. If there is a specific reason for making these changes, first discuss them at WP Philippines. Thank you. -- P 1 9 9   15:30, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I find what I originally ask myself: no reply at Tambayan Philippines
There are several things wrong with {{Philippine Census}} –
  • The internal format has the columns all aligned left, with a large gap aligned right in each column;
  • The graph fills the whole width of the entity, which means the graph is too wide to understand easily;
  • The width of the entity is too wide for my phone, neither table nor graph fits in a single view;
    • In my phone, but not in my pc, the header is not as wide as the body;
I think two columns is enough. By using graph-width=right, for pc style two columns of data, their height would be more or less the same height as the graph. For narrower pcs and phones, it would allow the graph to appear underneath.
{{Weather box}} –
  • The width is too wide to fit in my phone. It is three columns short, either right or left. I don't think that reducing to 90% is contrary to MOS:FONTSIZE (which I have read) and allows whole width.
  • [The colours are horrible, of course. To me, simple black and white text seems much better, Also see MOS:NAVBOXCOLOR ]
Do something about User:Migfab008
Auntie Kathleen (talk) 01:45, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
These are merely cosmetic changes to suit your device. The census and weather boxes are used in tens-of-thousands of articles (not just PH articles), so if everyone keeps on making changes to suit their own devices, nothing would be standardized anymore... -- P 1 9 9   02:20, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – February 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
  • Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
  • Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:38, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 February 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 20 February 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – March 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:19, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 March 2023[edit]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kesagami Provincial Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Woodland caribou.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 March 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 03 April 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – April 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your revert of Fokker[edit]

Re: you revert of a recent edit to Fokker with the reason "Not for company infoboxes" ... I respectfully ask you to reconsider. There are hundreds maybe thousands) of company articles where the age of the company's beginning and end are shown in the infobox. Truthanado (talk) 18:47, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Truthanado: I haven't noticed that, but when I do, I would remove it there as well. It just doesn't serve a purpose to state in every infobox how long ago a year is. Just my opinion of course, so maybe this should be discussed in a general forum or wikiproject... -- P 1 9 9   12:50, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for St. Raphael Provincial Park[edit]

On 13 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article St. Raphael Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the St. Raphael Provincial Park in Northern Ontario, Canada, is part of the 1,530 km2 (590 sq mi) St. Raphael Signature Site, which is recognized for its natural and recreational values? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Raphael Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, St. Raphael Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: User:HouseOfBetula-Gryfudd[edit]

Hello P199, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:HouseOfBetula-Gryfudd, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: User does exist, or this is not a user page. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:33, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ivanvector: Thanks for all your hard admin work. In this case, yes, the user exists "on paper", but the User page was not created by the namesake user but by an unrelated user, to promote some personal (?) topic it seems. If you still think that U2 doesn't apply, what deletion process applies then? MfD? -- P 1 9 9   18:06, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The speedy criteria have to be applied narrowly - if the criterion says "pages of users that don't exist", and the user does exist, then that criterion does not apply, end of story. The criteria are very black and white, because they're the limited cases where pages can be deleted without any discussion. Normally yes, if a non-article page is declined for speedy deletion then the next step is MFD, as there's no PROD for drafts. In this case, though, I would normally review against other criteria and maybe just change the tag and delete the page anyway, but I was suddenly called into a meeting and didn't get a chance to review this page thoroughly.
Having reviewed it now: the page was created by User:HistoricallyAccurate, and they created the page less than an hour after the account that that userspace belongs to was created. It seems obvious then that HistoricallyAccurate also created the HouseOfBetula-Gryfudd account. As far as I can tell this is the only other account that they have created, the content is made up (though there are fantasy nobility "leagues" and they have bled onto Wikipedia before), and none of the content was used in the user's other work. Since it doesn't seem to have any use towards Wikipedia's purpose it might meet WP:U5, except that it's supposed to be pages made by users without much other activity, and HistoricallyAccurate is fairly active. If they meant it as a test and weren't meaning to keep it then either WP:G2 or WP:G7 would apply.
How about we just ask? For now I'll move it to a subpage of HistoricallyAccurate's user space, and then I'll leave them a message asking what they're meaning to do with it, if anything. In that case the page will also be eligible for deletion under WP:G13 if it's not edited for six months, so one way or another it will eventually be dealt with. If you disagree you can of course re-tag the article with a different speedy tag (I won't reject you again but can't speak for other admins) or start a discussion at MFD. Cheers, and thanks for your work patrolling. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 23:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Parks, parks, oh wonderful parks![edit]

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Thank you for all the hard work you put into park articles. Awesome! -- Whpq (talk) 18:29, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Whpq: Thank you! Slow process but more to come! -- P 1 9 9   19:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spontaneous flora in Sainte-Anne-de-la-Pérade[edit]

can you explain why you delete the gallery in the site Sainte-Anne-de-la-Pérade my point is that those plants are as real as the church, the road, the river I understand that they also grow elsewhere but as you can see whit the géolocalisations those pictures where taken on the municipality site in those time so concern about ecologies for me it's important to realize that the plants are our day to day compagnon please reconsider Nichole Ouellette (talk) 14:36, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Nichole Ouellette: Thanks for your efforts at WP and your image uploads at Commons. As per WP:IG: "Wikipedia is not an image repository. A gallery is not a tool to shoehorn images into an article, and a gallery consisting of an indiscriminate collection of images of the article subject should generally either be improved in accordance with the below paragraphs or moved to Wikimedia Commons." In other words, the inclusion of the images at Commons is more than sufficient. Regards, -- P 1 9 9   14:46, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 April 2023[edit]

DYK for Lake of the Woods Provincial Park[edit]

On 28 April 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Lake of the Woods Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the mainland portion of Lake of the Woods Provincial Park in northwestern Ontario, Canada, was deregulated as part of a First Nations land claim settlement? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lake of the Woods Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Lake of the Woods Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – May 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kesagami Provincial Park[edit]

On 5 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kesagami Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the shores of Kesagami Lake in Kesagami Provincial Park (northern Ontario, Canada) are surrounded by "exceptional" peat cliffs reaching 4 metres (13 ft) in height? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kesagami Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kesagami Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kesagami Lake[edit]

On 5 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kesagami Lake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the shores of Kesagami Lake in Kesagami Provincial Park (northern Ontario, Canada) are surrounded by "exceptional" peat cliffs reaching 4 metres (13 ft) in height? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kesagami Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kesagami Lake), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:02, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 May 2023[edit]

DYK nomination of Otoskwin River[edit]

Hello! Your submission of Otoskwin River at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Flibirigit (talk) 21:43, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 May 2023[edit]

DYK for Otoskwin–Attawapiskat River Provincial Park[edit]

On 24 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Otoskwin–Attawapiskat River Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Otoskwin–Attawapiskat River Provincial Park, protecting the Otoskwin and Attawapiskat Rivers in Ontario, Canada, has archaeological and historical sites dating from 3000 BC to the 1800s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Otoskwin River. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Otoskwin–Attawapiskat River Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Otoskwin River[edit]

On 24 May 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Otoskwin River, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Otoskwin–Attawapiskat River Provincial Park, protecting the Otoskwin and Attawapiskat Rivers in Ontario, Canada, has archaeological and historical sites dating from 3000 BC to the 1800s? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Otoskwin River. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Otoskwin River), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

-- RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 5 June 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – June 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
  • As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.

Technical news

  • Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.

Arbitration

  • The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:33, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 June 2023[edit]

DYK for Turtle River–White Otter Lake Provincial Park[edit]

On 28 June 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Turtle River–White Otter Lake Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the White Otter Castle is the most popular attraction in the Turtle River–White Otter Lake Provincial Park, even though it is not accessible by road? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Turtle River-White Otter Lake Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Turtle River–White Otter Lake Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:02, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – July 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).

Administrator changes

added Novem Linguae
removed

Bureaucrat changes

removed MBisanz

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 3 July 2023[edit]

Reversion of the images I added on Coron, Palawan[edit]

I strongly disagree with your removal of my images that I added in the wiki page of Coron. I think they are significant because they show places in that town that are not normally known but should be known to other people. Therefore, I propose that it should be reverted since no one else has also placed pictures related to the geology of the area that is not limestone-related and Mt. Dalara. Pcbyed (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is what is Commons for. If there was a paragraph on geology, then it makes sense to add an image on geology. -- P 1 9 9   13:50, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2023[edit]

DYK for Algoma Headwaters Provincial Park[edit]

On 26 July 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Algoma Headwaters Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Algoma Headwaters Provincial Park in Ontario has some of the oldest and best samples of old-growth white pine in the Algoma region? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Algoma Headwaters Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Algoma Headwaters Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary[edit]

Precious
Five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 August 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – August 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).

Administrator changes

added Firefangledfeathers
removed

Interface administrator changes

added Novem Linguae

Technical news

Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal to Rename "South China Sea" to "West Philippine Sea" (La union wiki dispute)[edit]

Hello fellow editors,,

I would like to propose a discussion regarding the naming of the body of water commonly referred to as the "South China Sea." Given its geographical location and historical context, I believe it would be more accurate and appropriate to use the term "West Philippine Sea."

The name "South China Sea" has often been criticized for its bias towards one particular claimant and disregards the territorial disputes among neighboring countries. By using the term "West Philippine Sea," we can provide a more neutral and accurate representation of the area, highlighting the Philippines' claims without favoring any specific nation.

I encourage everyone to share their thoughts on this proposal. Let's engage in a constructive conversation and consider the historical, geographical, and political aspects when deciding on the most appropriate name for this body of water.

Thank you for your attention and participation.

Best regards, Haruno212007

Haruno212007 (talk) 04:20, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Haruno212007: First, my personal talk page is not the place to propose naming conventions for international bodies of water. That should be done at Talk:South China Sea. And secondly, such a proposal would not pass. Your proposed name "West Philippine Sea" is equally contentious and only applicable to use within the Philippines. WP is global, and therefore we use globally accepted common names, see WP:USECOMMONNAMES. Regards, -- P 1 9 9   18:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 August 2023[edit]

DYK for Kississing Lake[edit]

On 29 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kississing Lake, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Kississing Lake is threatened by water contaminated with tailings, it is the main resource for nearby residents? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kississing Lake. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kississing Lake), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 29 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 31 August 2023[edit]

Nomination of Ryan Gobbe for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ryan Gobbe, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Gobbe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' newsletter – September 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
  • A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that [s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment.

Technical news

Arbitration

  • The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged to note when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful.

Miscellaneous

  • Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:22, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Aubinadong River[edit]

On 8 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Aubinadong River, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Aubinadong River in Ontario, Canada, was an indigenous canoe route and is still used for canoe camping as its main recreational activity? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Aubinadong River. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Aubinadong River), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 September 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 3 October 2023[edit]

The Signpost: 23 October 2023[edit]

Lauwersmeer - Dyke/Dam - contradiction?[edit]

See page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lauwersmeer. My reading of it reveals that some clarification, or removal of contradiction may be appropriate.

Under "History", please review para 2, noting references to "32km", "dykes", "13km", "dam", "13 km dike plan was more expensive than the 32 km plan", and "government decided on the cheaper option". Then in para 4, note reference to "The 13-kilometer-long dike".

The whole reads as if the 32km plan was cheaper, and the government used the cheaper option, yet we are later told that the structure now existing is 13km. How can this be?

Perhaps someone with access to validated history of Lauwersmeer could clarify this? Pwat (talk) 09:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pwat: Wow, you are asking about an edit I did in 2007! And that edit was a merge, so I did not write that specific info. You better search through the original article's history to find who wrote it and ask them. Sorry, not much help... -- P 1 9 9   16:14, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 6 November 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – November 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).

Administrator changes

added 0xDeadbeef
readded Tamzin
removed Dennis Brown

Interface administrator changes

added Pppery
removed

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

  • Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
  • Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
  • Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
  • Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
  • Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
  • Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
  • An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:23, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Nominations in Commons[edit]

You recently nominated the following images for deletion:

With The claim that they are most likely not my own work, i can send you the link to my google photos with all the mete & EXIF data.

Link to album: https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipMqOJFN8aCTJLpDx-ZRR1c32RqtO1eG9oWhprKN6rqgMJP4fwJkUABy2kz2dMrILg?key=RHR1dExybDVzazJmWUVFTmtZa2RWRXNJNmVKMWdB (https://photos.app.goo.gl/n2yTTDbaEdrnhKAN8)


😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 18:01, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I messaged you here because i am using a vpn to access commons & cannot edit there(I only need it for commons, i can access all other wikimedia foundation sites.) 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 18:02, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaulGamerBoy360:OK noted. I have copied your comments to the DR discussion at Commons. -- P 1 9 9   19:37, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
thanks, sorry about all of this. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge seventh anniversary[edit]

WikiProject Canada 10,000 Challenge seventh anniversary

The Bronze Maple Leaf Award
This maple leaf is awarded to P199 for writing 8 new articles and improving dozens of other articles during the seventh year of The 10,000 Challenge of WikiProject Canada. Congratulations, and thank you for your contributions! Reidgreg (talk) 14:47, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 November 2023[edit]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 December 2023[edit]

Administrators' newsletter – December 2023[edit]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
  • The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
  • Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:54, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kaipokok Bay[edit]

On 12 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Kaipokok Bay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the only populated place on Kaipokok Bay in Labrador, Canada, is Postville (pictured)? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Kaipokok Bay. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Kaipokok Bay), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Eagle-Dogtooth Provincial Park[edit]

On 23 December 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Eagle-Dogtooth Provincial Park, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Eagle-Dogtooth Provincial Park in Ontario, Canada, contains part of the Experimental Lakes Area, a controlled area for conducting scientific experiments in lakes? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Eagle-Dogtooth Provincial Park. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Eagle-Dogtooth Provincial Park), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2023[edit]