User talk:Ottawakismet

Disambiguation link notification for April 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Manikata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dothraki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Japan–Korea disputes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jingu

Nuclear energy policy by country (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Westinghouse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queer as Folk (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited National Health Service, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asylum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

WP:BADDATEFORMAT

Hi. I noticed you reverted one of Yobot's edit. Please check WP:BADDATEFORMAT where correct and incorrect formats are given by the Manual of Style. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 17:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

South Keys Station

Are you happy with South Keys Station now? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:18, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I wont bother to edit it again.Ottawakismet (talk) 18:46, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Japan–Korea disputes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Niigata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chester, Nova Scotia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lunenburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

Citations

You removed the citation needed tags from some dates in the article on Dnepropetrovsk,[1] saying that there is "no dispute about these dates". In that case, it will be no problem for you to provide a citation.--Toddy1 (talk) 15:44, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Crimean referendum, 2014

Hello, are you able to provide a source for the claim that Srđa Trifković is an author of books that deny genocide, please? — Petr Matas 19:58, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Also try to provide a source for the concerns about the monitors' bias - see Talk:Crimean referendum, 2014#Bias Concerns. — Petr Matas 20:11, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ottawakismet. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ottawakismet. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ottawakismet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Contenido no favorable

Pienso que como el articulo fue escrito por alguien perteneciente al corte internacional de justicia o CIJ la cual esta a favor de guyana halla puesto cosas que no concuerdan como que "El esequibo fue parte de la Guayana Neerlandesa" y es que es verdad pero solo la parte este del Esequibo no el oeste el cual es perteneciente a Venezuela no a esta ademas como su nombre lo indica es una corte de justicia que se encarga arteglar y hacer justicia a problemas Fronterisos internacionalmente asi que lo mas justo es que como a Venezuela le a pertenecido el esequibo desde la Capitania general de Venezuela hasta que se le arrebato asi que primero fue de venezuela no de gran bretaña y mucho menos de Guyana ahora espero que corrijan eso CesarR1 (talk) 06:04, 12 July 2020 (UTC)