User talk:Orioane/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

First archive, from the beginning until the 6'th of january 2006 when I came back from the hollidays.

back

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Orioane/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! KissL 15:45, 11 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations![edit]

Nice work Oriane with the Timiş page! (Bună treabă! Felicitări! Pagina arată mult mai profi' acum) Tavilis 14:53, 12 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


R(r)oma(s)[edit]

Hi! As far as I know, most English publications use Roma, with one r. And, by the way, the plural is usually Roma, without the s at the end. Rroma is used as well, but much less frequently. The main wiki article Roma people uses the single r version. I guess we should stick to this in the Cluj article too.--Tamas 14:56, 30 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Zalau_in_Romania.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Zalau_in_Romania.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know on the image description page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Otherwise, see Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Thanks so much.

The same goes for Image:Vaslui in Romania.png. If you needh help, you can ask me on my talk page. For now it;s no source. This means it could be deleted in 7 days. Superm401 | Talk 03:31, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the mistakes. There are a couple of pictures in this situation. I'll try and fix their situation as soon as I can. Orioane 10:43, 26 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Alexandria in Romania.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Alexandria in Romania.png. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag, so its copyright status is therefore unclear. Please add a tag to let us know its copyright status. (If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}.) See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have tagged them, too. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Arnie587 15:21, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

It appears many, if not, all of your Romania map images are without sources. This is a notice that I have marked some {{no source}} already, and will tag any others without sources similarly. Images without sources can be deleted 7 days after that template is applied. Superm401 | Talk 13:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
All were without sources and have been tagged {{no source}}. Again, if they remain without source information and tags, they can be deleted in 7 days. Superm401 | Talk 21:16, 5 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Development regions of Romania maps[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that a lot of your Romanian development region maps (such as this one: Image:V dr ro.png) are currently untagged. I have a good hunch that you made them, but to make it official can you go to each map and license it under the GFDL?

The following are untagged:

Please tag them as soon as possible. Thank you. --Bash 22:38, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:Alexandria in Romania.png[edit]

The image you uploaded, Image:Alexandria in Romania.png, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:27, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:Bistrita in Romania.png[edit]

The image you uploaded, Image:Bistrita in Romania.png, has no no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 12:32, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:Botosani in Romania.png[edit]

The image you uploaded, Image:Botosani in Romania.png, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:Braila in Romania.png[edit]

The image you uploaded, Image:Braila in Romania.png, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:12, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image source/licensing for Image:C dr ro.png[edit]

The image you uploaded, Image:C dr ro.png, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:26, 17 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romania Images[edit]

You replaced Image:Satu Mare in Romania.png's {{no source}} tag with {{GFDL}}. However, that tag doesn't really satisfy me in that case. I know you didn't take a picture of that map yourself(or if you did, it was a picture of something copyrighted anyway). You couldn't have drawn it from memory, however well you know Romania. Therefore, you must have at least got the base map of Romania from somewhere. All I ask is, where? I don't dispute the source may have been public domain or GFDL. I just need to know for sure, and I can't without the exact source. Therefore, I'm have all your Romania images on my watchlist, and will make sure they remain {{no source}} until I have details. You can reply on my talk page or just start putting the information on the image description pages. Thanks for cooperating. Superm401 | Talk 01:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly it was Image:Sibiu in Romania.png which I modified and added the position of each city, and I far as I can see, that one is in Public Domain. As far as I can see, I'll rerelease them bach into the PD. When I modified them I didn't knew so much about licensing, and I recognize my fault for not digging deeper into that. Then I hadn't had the time to modify the licensing thing, and I'll try to fix that in the near future.-Orioane 11:30, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Appreciate it. I've tagged that image {{no source notified}} and am going to make sure it remains that way until I get more information. If he provides proof his image is PD, I'll tag all of yours with whatever you wanted(GFDL, I think). Luckily, he seems to be a fairly active user, so maybe he'll actually respond. Superm401 | Talk 14:06, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I see you've tagged all of the images {{PD}}, based on the above info. However, as I've said, I'm suspicious of whether the other image is really PD. Therefore, all of your Romania maps are going to have to remain {{no source}} until I get definitive info. I'm going to retag them as such. Please don't revert until there's evidence of coypright status. Superm401 | Talk 14:21, 20 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I've learned that they'er all based on a PD CIA map. I'll retag the images I tagged {{no source}} as whatever you had. Thanks for cooperating. Superm401 | Talk 12:25, 21 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moldavian rulers[edit]

Mulţumesc pentru mesaj. Te rog să păstrezi "Voivode" (nu "Voievod") în "Succesion Box". Mulţumesc.Dahn 10:03, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Te rog, nu mai scrie "Moldova(n)" în loc de "Moldavia(n)". Ţi-am revăzut nişte articole - nu le schimba din nou: erau bune, dar sintaxa cerea îmbunătăţiri, trebuia să mai elimin nişte repetiţii şi să adaug legături cu alte articole. Te mai rog sa scrii cu diacritice şi să eviţi să iei info de pe paginile în română (o mare parte sunt sub orice critică). Chestia cu originea Muşatinilor în Valahia este foarte discutabilă ("sursele" care o indică sunt frustrant de părtinitoare) - I turned it to "some argue" or something like that. Mulţumesc.Dahn 20:08, 12 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sibiu[edit]

[1]: glad you found it, now could you cite your source on this hard-to-obtain information? -- Jmabel | Talk 05:23, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Bucharest[edit]

Yes, that would be great. My e-mail is rowikipedia at yahoo.com. It would be good to show the nice trams! (And new buses/Ikarus trolleybuses too. The metro photo is already pretty nice.) Ronline 12:18, 22 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mulţumesc! Poza este inclusa la Bucharest şi Transport in Bucharest. Unghiul este frumos, şi tramvaiul deasemenea! Ronline 08:53, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moldovan language[edit]

Salut Orioane! You may contribute with your knowledge at the page Moldovan language. However I congratulate you for being in France for making your PhD.  Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Ronline for Admin[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ronline and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Ronline . I have nominated Ronline to be Administrator for English Wikipedia. Let's vote for him! Bonaparte  talk & contribs

Salut[edit]

Salut Mihai,

Am vazut ca esti doctorand in Franta, la Rennes. Eu am stat in post-doc acolo timp de doi ani, si mai merg inca des prin zona (acum sunt la Paris). Tu in ce domeniu lucrezi? Eu lucram la IRISA (informatica).

User:Dpotop

Iti doresc spor la teza, si bafta. Primul an nu ar trebui sa fie foarte dificil (desi asta depinde de director, de orele pe care le dai, daca dai, etc.). Daca vrei sa mai discutam pe tema asta, adresa mea e dpotop1@yahoo.com .

User:Dpotop

Ştefan Octavian Iosif[edit]

How useful is it to have the article titled "Ştefan Octavian Iosif" when no english keyboard has an Ş? JHMM13 06:47, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response! I'm not quite sure I follow what you mean, though. I have tried to search for "Stefan Octavian Iosif" and I simply get a 5% match to a "List of Romanians." Were you requesting that I create the page? I'm sorry once again for not understanding. I also fixed the messed up title there, sorry about that. JHMM13 06:57, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for clearing that up. You look like a great contributor and I hope to run into you again sometime. Happy editing! JHMM13 07:10, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Sergiu Nicolaescu[edit]

Hi. I left a message on the Sergiu Nicolaescu talk page. Maybe you are interested. If not, sorry. - AdamSmithee 10:33, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the help. The problem is that I don't know enough about SN either and for the moment I don't have the time to look into it more closely. Besides, it could become controversial and I felt I needed some help & second opinions before editing. I will contribute to it more.
I will try to put something together on Romanian cinema after 1990, but I'll have to document more. - AdamSmithee 16:34, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Poze Bucureşti[edit]

Salut. Da, pozele sunt frumoase, doar că ne având informaţii despre sursă, nu pot fi incluse într-un featured article. A doua poză îmi place şi ar fi bună pentru secţia nouă de architectură. Prima poză e frumoasă dar foarte ciudată... ar fi bună o poză cu construcţia acea nouă din spatele bărcii, deşi barca arată cam historică-orientală, nu prea bucureşteană! Încă o chestie - dă un ochi pe la secţia nouă de arhitectură să vezi dacă informaţiile sunt corecte. Dacă ai ceva de adăugat (mai ales despre blocurile moderne post-revoluţionare din Bucureşti), eşti binevenit oricând! Ronline: National Day of Romania 1 December 16 years of freedom and loving it! 10:12, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cluj[edit]

Salut! Mulţam de mesaj. Sper să nu se supere nimeni că-ţi răspund româneşte, dar mi-e mai la îndemână. M-am uitat cu plăcere peste Culture of Romania. Este o chestie care nu mi se pare conformă, respectiv scrie acolo că "Supplex Libellus Valachorum" ar fi fost tipărit la "Cluj-Napoca". Denumirea "Cluj-Napoca" este foarte recentă. Personal îmi evocă mereu considerentele meschine pentru care numele Clujului a fost schimbat, respectiv pentru a aduce un afront populaţiei maghiare. Adăugarea denumirii "Napoca" nu a făcut ca oraşul să devină mai românesc, ci doar a lăsat să iasă la suprafaţă nişte străbune complexe. În paranteză fie observat cât de caraghios ar fi ca italienii din Milano să-şi reboteze oraşul în Milano-Mediolanum. În orice caz, pentru mine personal Clujul rămâne Cluj (oraşul în care m-am născut), iar când aud de "Cluj-Napoca" îmi reprezint involuntar altă realitate, adică o clolnie muncitorească, cu oameni noi ai revoluţiei socialiste, trişti, ignoranţi, violenţi. Categoria care după Revoluţie a intrat în conştiinţa colectivă în mod generic ca "mineri". Vezi aşadar că intelectualii ardeleni din secolul al XVIII-lea şi al XIX-lea nu aveau nimic în comun cu gargara ceauşisto-funariotă. Ei îşi tipăreau lucrările de cultură fie la "Blaş" sau "Blasiu" (ortografiat astfel), fie la "Cibiniu" sau "Sabiniu" (nu trebuie să-ţi spun despre ce oraş e vorba :)), fie la "Cluş" sau "Clusiu", nicidecum la "Cluj-Napoca". Saltul acesta spre naţionalismul primitiv, care nu ştie că denumirea de "Cluj" este mai latină decât "Napoca" - căci "Napoca" a fost o denumire dacă, pe când "castrum Clus" (atestat la 1173), mai târziu "Clusa", evocă faptul că oraşul se află într-un loc închis. "Clusa" şi "Clusium" sugerează foarte bine că oraşul este înconjurat din toate părţile de dealuri. Dar de unde să ştie securiştii deghizaţi în mari apărători ai românismului toate aceste amănunte de cultură! Rugămintea mea ar fi dacă poţi să înlocuieşti în cutia cu judeţele României "Cluj" cu "Cluj County" (ca să fie la fel cu "Alba County" etc.), că nu ştiu cum se face. M-aş bucura ca cei care caută "Cluj" să nu fie redirecţionaţi spre judeţul Cluj, ci spre oraşul Cluj, la fel cum este pe wikipedia română. Mulţam! Mai vorbim! --Mihai Andrei 14:08, 2 December 2005 (UTC) PS.[reply]

În template "judete" am adăugat "County" şi lângă "Cluj". Acum ar mai rămâne doar de corectat link-urile care trimit spre Cluj, deşi se referă la judeţul Cluj. Ar fi fost absolut ridicol să trebuiască să spun că regele Matia Corvinul s-a născut în "Cluj-Napoca", când denumirea acesta provine din ultima fază a naţional-comunismului. E ca şi când m-ar sili cineva să afirm că Immanuel Kant s-ar fi născut la Kaliningrad, nu la Königsberg, cum ştie toată lumea. Nota bene, Kalinin a fost un prieten şi colaborator al lui Stalin şi în amintirea acelei persoane Königsbergul a fost numit "Kaliningrad". --Mihai Andrei 14:19, 2 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

HunTomy[edit]

See Wikipedia:Requests for protection -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 20:51, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander for Admin[edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Alexander_007 ,

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Alexander_007 . I've nominated User:Alexander_007 as admin. Let's vote for him! -- Bonaparte talk & contribs 14:03, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Our forum[edit]

Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 17:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mihai, mci de mesaj. Sper doar sa am timp & dispozitie pentru niste edit-uri ca lumea. Oricum o sa incerc sa contribui cat stiu si pot. - Bogdan AdamSmithee 22:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator nomination[edit]

Salut Orioane! Te-am nominalizat pentru administrator la Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Orioane! Dacă accepţi această nominalizare, te rog semnează acolo şi răspunde la întrebările de candidatură. Numai bine, Ronline ✉ 10:09, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Multumesc frumos de traducere! Sa ai bafta la vot :-) .-- Bonaparte talk & contribs 18:42, 5 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Inuse[edit]

You've had an "inuse" tag on Culture of Romania for about 7 hours since your last edit. I don't want to cross edits with you, but this is an awfully long time between edits to ask others not to touch the article. I really recommend that if you are stepping about for more than about 90 minutes, remove the inuse tag. I'd like to be able to come in and copyedit behind you. -- Jmabel | Talk 07:09, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. What's the use of the "under construction" tag? How is that different from any other article? -- Jmabel | Talk 07:47, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This edit of mine had a conflict with yours; I saved anyway, and if I read the history correctly, yours was just a tag change, so there's nothing for me to re-incorporate. Anyway, I'm calling it a night because I need to get to work in the morning. It's 1:00 here. -- Jmabel | Talk 08:59, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Math markup incorrect[edit]

I'm reverting your unnecessary and incorrect math markup on many of the units pages. Even if you fix it with space between the numbers and the units, and upright--not italic--unit symbols, I still don't like the vertical bar divisions in simple cases such as most of these. If you put it back in, do it right. Gene Nygaard 20:03, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your <div> markup with 200% font size explained on my talk page is okay with me, though some might complain about that type of markup too. I think some people just don't like the html tags. The math markup can be made to work similarly, but it is a lot of work and the upright letters don't look very good in many cases, and to me this looks better. Another possibility would be h4 or h3 html tags, I don't think they get put into the table of contents like headers with the equal signs are.
[strike my header suggestion; they do go into TOC]
1 V = 1 W/A = 1 m2·kg·s–3·A–1
1 V = 1 W/A = 1 m2·kg·s–3·A–1
I don't have any problem with the idea of some kind of emphasis, as long as it doesn't get too gaudy; it was the italic symbols that were the biggest problem. Maybe 150% would be less likely to get complaints from people already using large font sizes, just something to consider. Gene Nygaard 21:46, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ioan Potcoavă[edit]

Mulţumesc mult.Dahn 20:19, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Poza[edit]

Lasa ma poza aia in pace. Te rog sa stergi advertismentul care lai pus pe poza de la Vaslui. Atat cat nu strica, las-o balta. Nu o sa moara nimeni daca sta acolo, fara copyright, iar tu doar nu esti securist. --Anittas 18:11, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Imagine aviatie[edit]

Da te rog sa ma scuzi pt ca nu am facut ce miai spus. Am vrut numai sa ajut wikipedia. Mersi pt site-uri. Dar nu inteleg ceva: daca vreau sa adaug nishte foto pe wikipedia, ce se intampla daca pun nishte fotografii piratate? Nu strica la nimic. Oricum tu fa ce vrei cu ele. Eu o sa citesc site-urile shi o sa incerc sa indeplinesc conditiile. NorbertArthur 10 December 2005

Vlad Ţepeş[edit]

Thanks for the notice, but I cannot really look into it now. However, I've glanced over the page, and the info looks elloquent enough to my eyes (I was not able to look into the details). Two things I'm not sure about: what precisely he/she took out in order to write these down (the text was re-arranged), and the wording - which'll have to be checked (for example, I'd use and link "Sfatul boieresc" instead of "Council" [note], and I never heard of persons being knighted by voivodes, only of voivodes being knighted). Will get back on that.Dahn 22:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

[note] After I get details out of the way, it's gonna be an article on its own (hopefully)Dahn 22:41, 10 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality userbox[edit]

May I *ahem* borrow it from you?Dunemaire 17:19, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Mavrocordato[edit]

Thanks. That's perfect. I'll get to work on it. Dahn 17:11, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Campeni[edit]

Actually, I welcome all your changes and find them excellent. As for Tara Motilor - I'm on holiday from work these days so I might as well try it.If you can keep an eye on it and wikify whatever it'll be needed, even better.Dunemaire 17:23, 11 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Ţara Moţilor is done - it took me a day of work but I like how it turned out.Have fun putting the rest of the diacritics if you feel like it, I'm off to make lunch :) Dunemaire 15:25, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

  • I happened to have a few taken in the Trascau mountains - so your wish is granted.Dunemaire 16:59, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Accession of Romania to the European Union[edit]

Thank you Mihai for your help on Accession of Romania to the European Union! Your edits are welcome! Let us expand this article since is of so much importance to Romania. -- Bonaparte talk 18:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a fost fara intentie. Lasa ca ajungi tu admin si dai mai usor revert.-- Bonaparte talk 22:06, 12 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Bravo Mihai, felicitari, tine-o tot asa! Nu uita la cine trebuie sa spui mersi. La Ronline tb sa-i multumesti cu totul si cu totul dinadins. Daca nu il rugam sa te propuna si te propuneam eu poate numai iti compromiteam candidatura. Oricum iti doresc succes mai departe. --User:Bonaparte

Sa nu uiti sa ma ajuti sa facem un articol beton la cel cu UE! :)

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations! It's my pleasure to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator. You should read the relevant policies and other pages linked to from the administrators' reading list before carrying out tasks like deletion, protection, banning users, and editing protected pages such as the Main Page. Most of what you do is easily reversible by other sysops, apart from page history merges and image deletion, so please be especially careful with those. You might find the new administrators' how-to guide helpful. Cheers! -- Cecropia 15:13, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes...congrats on your promotion!--MONGO 20:31, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, may you use the mop and the bucket to the benefit of all. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t • @ 20:44, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more congratulations... -- DS1953 20:59, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Your random congratulatory image

Congrats! Have fun & happy editing! - AdamSmithee 22:12, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, and you're quite welcome! --Merovingian 22:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And another congrats! HGB 22:42, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

congrats from me too. :-) Tomertalk 23:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. it's another congratulations. Bravo şi noroc! Uncke Herb 08:39, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Conga rats [2]for your promotion ! Dunemaire 08:55, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Wow, my first barnstar .. Thank you! Dunemaire 16:36, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

No problem. I am going through the same thing now, (and got one negative vote, that hurts), so I know what you are going through. lol. See you around.Gator (talk) 20:22, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

DUH...well you knew that because you voted support. THANKS! I feel dumb...Gator (talk) 20:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian cinema[edit]

I know :-( Problem is that info is hard to find. I'm trying to find some offline info and concentrate first on cinema after 1989, but it might take some time. Anyway, I didn't forget about it. On a related note, I'll try to build up the article on Sergiu N, but here the problem is that most info is heavily POVed (especially the one coming directly from him) - AdamSmithee 22:23, 13 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations.[edit]

Your position is well deserved. Wish you all the best for your future endaveours. --Aravind Parvatikar 10:31, 14 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Thank you for supporting it. I've been promoted with a final vote of 64-2. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 07:09, Dec. 17, 2005

Culture of Romania[edit]

Salut Orioane! Am avut şansa să citesc articolul tău Culture of Romania. Vreau să-ţi spun că a fost o plăcere să îl citesc - este un articol minunat, plin de informaţii şi foarte frumos scris. În curând îl voi nominaliza pentru Featured articles. Felicitări şi Sărbători Fericite, Ronline ✉ 02:13, 24 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anittas[edit]

Anittas is now saying in so many words that "Romanian hegemonism is justified" in dealing with the article on the Republic of Moldova. Orioane, if none of the Romanians will face him down on this, he can basically claim to be speaking for the lot of you, and nothing I can say will make any difference. I think that what he is saying is appalling, but it is clear that he could not care less what I think. -- Jmabel | Talk 01:57, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's right. Romania should influence R. of Moldova and even encourage them to reunite with us. What's your problem? It's our right. --Anittas 02:27, 25 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Anittas. Thank you Mihai for your support on Transylvanian_Plateau :) -- Bonaparte talk 12:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year[edit]

Wish you a happy and Prosperous New Year

Aravind Parvatikar

La Multi Ani Mihai![edit]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Portal:Romania/New_article_announcements#January_2006 aici gasesti ultimele articole create de noi :) Bonaparte talk 10:11, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mihai te rog sa nu dai revert. Denumirea este pentru judete nu pentru orase. La orase nu am nimic pot sa puna 20 de nume. Dar, oficial si tinand cont de faptul ca organizarea ca judete a fost numai pe timpul romaniei determina sa fie numai in limba romana. Nu concid judetele cu comitatele de pe vremea ungariei si deci nici numele. A pune si in limba maghiara inseamna POV. E la fel cum am pune la landurile germane si denumirea in limba romana. Bonaparte talk 14:56, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Orioane/Archive_1&oldid=1145322182"