User talk:One of Seventeenmillion Jews

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Gyonshiku Hata, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page C have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Doug Weller talk 05:22, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ten Lost Tribes[edit]

Createspace books are selfpublished and cannot be used as sources. Sources generally need to directly discuss the subject of the article. And who are the "we" who can confirm the blood work? Is that copied from somewhere? Doug Weller talk 05:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gyonshiku Hata, Welcome to Wikipedia. I have reverted your edits at Ten Lost Tribes again, after you undid Doug Weller's reversion. Please read WP:V concerning verifiability of content added to Wikipedia articles, and WP:IRS for finding and using reliable sources. All content in Wikipedia must be verifiable, and may be challenged and removed by any editor until proper sourcing is found. Your next step, if you would still like to add this content, is to go to the article talk page, Talk:Ten Lost Tribes, and add a new section to discuss the content you wish to add, and to attempt to gain consensus there for this addition. If you need more help on how to do this, feel free to ask below, or at my talk page, or add {{Help me}} to a new question below and someone will come along to help you. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 19:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As you've been informed by the other editors above, the material you've now re-added yet again is inappropriate for Wikipedia. In The Footsteps of the Lost Ten Tribes is not science and it's not peer-reviewed; it is a self-published book that can't be used as a source here. Please do read the links in the welcome message above and engage other editors in discussion.--William Thweatt ^Talk^Contribs 05:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Your recent editing history at Ten Lost Tribes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hertz1888 (talk) 06:43, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop edit warring and start talking[edit]

Even after Hertz1888's recent message above, I see that you reverted again six minutes later at Ten Lost Tribes. By my count, that makes a total of four reverts in the last 25 hours (05:37 May 9, 03:33 May 10, 05:40 May 10, 06:48 May 10). Stop your disruptive edit warring immediately. Use the article's talk page at Talk:Ten Lost Tribes to talk to other editors and come to some consensus. As far as I'm concerned, this is your last warning. Any further revert on your part will result in an action to protect the article against your disruption, and may lead to a loss of editing privileges. Mathglot (talk) 07:22, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are continuing to edit war and added a fifth revert (07:21 May 10, 2018‎) while I was typing the comment above. You will soon no longer have access to this article anymore. Mathglot (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, and a sixth revert by you now: (07:29 May 10). You certainly are stepping on the accelerator as you get closer to the cliff edge. Good luck, you're going to need it. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 07:35, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gyonshiku_Hata reported by User:Doug Weller (Result: ). Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain to me how to use message? I don't know how to use it yet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyonshiku_Hata (talk • contribs) 07:44, May 10, 2018 (UTC)

Using talk pages for discussion[edit]

Gyonshiku Hata, when having discussions with other editors on User talk pages (like this page), or on article talk pages (like Talk:Ten Lost Tribes) there are some guidelines or recommendations that make it easier for editors to follow discussions, and to understand who said what, and in reply to whom. Please read about this at WP:TALK. Two important things to keep in mind about Talk page discussions, are: Indentation, and Signature.

Indentation: indent your comment by placing a colon ( : ) in column one. If the comment above you already has colons at the beginning of the line, then your reply should have one more colon than that one does. See WP:INDENT for more about this.

Signature: End your comment by adding four tildes at the very end, like this: ~~~~. The Wikimedia software that runs Wikipedia will convert this into your username and a timestamp automatically (just like the one at the end of this post). (Note the tilde ( ~ ) character top-left on the keyboard image.)

There are other guidelines and suggestions about Talk pages, to help make them clear and easy to follow for everybody, but the two points above are the most important ones in my opinion, and it will help you discuss matters at Wikipedia with other editors, if you can study and learn these guidelines now. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ten Lost Tribes. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 13:56, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please take this time to read the advice other have given you and to follow the links that lead to pages describing our policies and guidelines. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 14:00, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You should be using your talk page only to make unblock appeals, not recreate the material that led to your block. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:56, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: for all of us[edit]

No 'argument for the sake of argument' (for example, different religious doctrinal presupposition: trinitarian myself vs. atheist wiki editors), please. I can remove any comments at any time. whoever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gyonshiku Hata (talk • contribs) first added at 01:18, May 11, 2018; and subsequently revised (UTC)

Please, after each of your posts here, add four tildes, like this: ~~~~. On many English computer keyboards, this is located in the top row, to the left of the numeral '1'. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 03:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Are you really siggesting that the editors reverting you are atheists and are reverting you because you're a Trinitarian? Because thats not what happened You've been told why. I asked you a specific question that you ducked. Yes, you can remove my post, but that's treated as an acknowledgement that you read it. Note that if when your block expires if you continue with the same edits instead of trying to get agreement on the talk page you will probe blocked again, possibly indefinitely. Doug Weller talk 05:18, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

국어사전 예문 / 진화론을 믿는 다윈주의자와 창조론을 믿는 목사님 사이에 논쟁이 벌어졌다. (표제어: 다윈주의자 )

사마리아인 [-人, Samaritan] : https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1023479&cid=50762&categoryId=50770

Ten maternal lineages were identified in the Samaritan isolate (Table 2 and Figures 1a–1b). Three of them descend from non‐Samaritan women who married into the community in recent times. Altogether 124 DNA samples (57 males and 67 females) were screened for the mtDNA hypervariable I (HVI) and hypervariable II (HVII) control regions by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. Direct sequencing was further performed on 46 samples for the HVI and 54 for the HVII control regions, in order to confirm the SSCP results. To examine Y chromosome mutation rates, we typed 12 Y‐STRs in a total of 74 DNA samples from males whose family and direct ancestor‐descendant relationships are known for the last seven generations. These males descend from only four paternal ancestors whose lineages are designated C, D, M and Z (See Figures 2a–2d). The Samaritan study was approved by the Tel‐Aviv University institutional review board. (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1046/j.1469-1809.2003.00024.x)

Samaritans, with a different haplotype in each lineage: C, D, M and Z ... Judah (Haplo J) + Northern Israelite (Haplo C, D, M and Z ...).

cf. https://busy.org/@kyungsik-kim/20 , https://busy.org/@kyungsik-kim/the-10-lost-tribe-of-israel

Gyonshiku Hata talk 22:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]