User talk:OnePieceMaster5000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I see you're busy writing articles on One piece episodes, could you please make the articles a little bit more contextual, perhaps? Try putting yourself into the situation of stumbling across the article without knowing about One Piece, would you have any idea what the article is about?

A good way to start your articles is:

Article name is the #th episode of One piece

You can also read the manual of style if you'd like to learn how to make your articles blend in with the rest of the articles here on wikipedia, which you probably have noticed follows a certain style.

Just leave me a note on my talk page if you need any help...

-Obli (Talk)? 21:04, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, OnePieceMaster5000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --John Nagle 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be posting a story, chapter by chapter, with each chapter in a new Wikipedia article. This is unsuitable material for Wikipedia. However, you could post such material in Wikisource, which is for original work. Thanks. --John Nagle 22:17, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia, which you are more than welcome to do.  (aeropagitica)  19:44, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2. The Great Swordsman Appears! Pirate Hunter, Roronoa Zoro[edit]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Vegaswikian 23:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fanfiction[edit]

Wikipedia is not the place for fanfiction. Please cease adding it, as you have been asked to repeatedly before. --Trafton 12:26, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Luffy! The Man Who Will Become Pirate King[edit]

About your article I'm Luffy! The Man Who Will Become Pirate King, I have moved it to One Piece because it is about the cartoon. Leidiot 12:29, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't do that[edit]

Quit adding links to YouTube for episodes of crappy anime. Luigi30 (Ταλκ το mε) 13:48, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source to verify this article? I can't find a mention of it anywhere. Joyous | Talk 01:42, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Ok, how about some context? Is it a TV show? If so, what country? A movie? A comic book? Anime? Joyous | Talk 00:06, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Whose Line show 106[edit]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Whose Line show 106. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --- RockMFR 05:31, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Whose Line show 107[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Whose Line show 107, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Whose Line show 107 is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Whose Line show 107, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whose notability is it anyway?[edit]

I suggest you stop creating these Whose Line articles. The lack of context you could fix but I think they would fail a notability test at AfD. I enjoyed the program but would never vote for an article about each one. -- RHaworth 18:17, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whose Line articles[edit]

Please stop creating these articles. For starters, I just realized that all the information you're putting up is a copyright violation of tv.com and so they will all be speedy deleted. But even assuming that you fix that and the concerns with context mentioned above, I can guarantee that there would be an overwhelming consensus to merge all of this info into an episode guide list. Please see this guideline for details. Pascal.Tesson 20:52, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Chital has been reverted, as it appears to introduce incorrect information. Please do not intentionally add incorrect information to articles; use the sandbox for testing. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:29, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Hot Fuss Tour[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Hot Fuss Tour. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hot Fuss Tour. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:05, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]