User talk:Obscuros

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Obscuros, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

meco (talk) 08:12, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grønland (Street)[edit]

Hello. I noticed you have found a possible inaccuracy or incompleteness in Wikipedia, when you placed a ProD tag on the article Grønland (Street). You left the following comment:

Grønland tends to refer to a neighbourhood in central Oslo. Though there is a street in that neighbourhood by the same name, that is not what one generally thinks of in this case. This article started with the headline 'Grønland', but was changed later to 'Grønland (street)' by someone who may not have been familiar with Oslo or Norway. I've moved the article back to the original page. This page is not needed, and I propose that it be deleted.

Please note: Wikipedia is a work in progress. The suffix "(Street)" in "Grønland (Street)" reminds the reader this article is about the street, not the neighbourhood. If the neighbourhood is notable, then there may be an article about the neighbourhood - if so, it would be either at Grønland, or Grønland (neighbourhood), or some variation thereof. If both these links do not lead the the appropriate article or are red, feel free to create the article about the neighbourhood yourself. If you choose to do so, you may wish to turn Grønland into a disambiguation page, if it is not already. This article should not be deleted, however, as it does have some significance. If you wish to create the article, you may wish to peruse WP:FIRST and WP:CREATE. If you have any questions, feel free to ask them on my talk page, or at the help desk. Intelligentsium 00:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it, Grønland could refer to multiple entities. In Wikipedia, we generally use disambiguations to resolve issues, like this one, in which one name refers to, or may refer to, multiple things. If the content of the article Grønland (Street) already exists at Grønland, a redirect should be created to direct readers who search for its former title, "Grønland (Street)", to its current title, "Grønland". However, there are complications involved now, most likely caused by copypasting. I believe the correct place to go now is WP:REPAIR. Intelligentsium 01:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grønland may refer to Greenland in Danish. Intelligentsium 01:39, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:Redirect states that redirects in other languages are acceptable, as "useful" redirects. For example, "", the Chinese character for "water", redirects to water - even though it is relatively uncommon that a user searches for "水". Intelligentsium 02:00, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Prometa edit sources.[edit]

I am writing in regards to your edit of the Prometa protocol's controlled studies, you write the following:

"This study of the 50-patients was placebo controlled! It was then "open label" AFTER to those who felt they received a placebo. What that means is: those who wanted "the OTHER treatment (whether the prometa or the placebo) did, in fact, get the opportunity to receive it because they stayed in this study ALL the way to its end. THAT IS FACT!"

The tone of your edit seems to be personal and lacks proper citing of sources. I am willing to review any information that you can provide to provide foundation for your claim. The beauty of a user contributed Wiki is that it its based upon reference-able fact.

--Cl.crosby (talk) 14:54, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I deeply appologize. I now see that I was incorrect it was an edit by anon user 209.253.0.170. Sorry for any misunderstanding. I apperciate your prompt response.

--Cl.crosby (talk) 00:28, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]